Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Université de Liège, Gembloux, Belgium.
J Plant Res. 2020 Mar;133(2):271-277. doi: 10.1007/s10265-019-01162-2. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
Studies of plant-silicon (Si) interaction benefit from safe, affordable and accurate methods to measure acid-insoluble silica (phytoliths) for a large number of plant samples. This study aimed to evaluate the comparability between two chemical methods to dissolve leaf silica, borate fusion and 1% sodium carbonate (NaCO) extraction, in combination of two detection methods (ICP, molybdenum-blue colorimetry).We compared the results obtained by these methods, using dried leaf samples of five tropical tree species that differ widely in Si concentrations (4 to 100 mg g DW). Leaf Si concentration values determined after the two extraction methods were highly correlated (y = 0.79x, R = 0.998). However, compared to the extraction with borate fusion, the 1% NaCO method resulted in lower Si concentration per unit dry mass by 16% to 32% (mean of 24.2%). We also found that molybdenum-blue colorimetry method may interfere with certain extraction methods. A simple equation can be used to correct for systematic underestimation of Si contents determined after extraction with 1% NaCO, which is the least expensive and safest among commonly used methods for extraction of Si from land plants.
植物-硅(Si)相互作用的研究受益于安全、经济且精确的方法来测量大量植物样品中的酸不溶性硅(植硅体)。本研究旨在评估两种溶解叶片硅的化学方法(硼砂熔融法和 1%碳酸钠(NaCO)提取法)与两种检测方法(ICP、钼蓝比色法)相结合的适用性。我们比较了这两种方法在 5 种热带树种干燥叶片样本中的应用结果,这些树种的硅浓度差异很大(4 至 100 mg g DW)。两种提取方法测定的叶片硅浓度值高度相关(y=0.79x,R=0.998)。然而,与硼砂熔融法相比,1%NaCO 法导致单位干质量的硅浓度降低了 16%至 32%(平均降低 24.2%)。我们还发现,钼蓝比色法可能会干扰某些提取方法。可以使用一个简单的方程来校正 1%NaCO 提取法测定的硅含量的系统低估,1%NaCO 提取法是最经济、最安全的陆地植物硅提取常用方法之一。