文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

愿景“附加”提高 EQ-5D 的反应性:白内障手术研究的初步证据。

A vision 'bolt-on' increases the responsiveness of EQ-5D: preliminary evidence from a study of cataract surgery.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, #02-01, 31 Biopolis Way, Singapore, Singapore.

Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jun;21(4):501-511. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01156-w. Epub 2020 Jan 4.


DOI:10.1007/s10198-019-01156-w
PMID:31902023
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: (1) To evaluate the effect of adding a vision dimension ('bolt-on') to the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) and 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) on their responsiveness, and (2) to compare the responsiveness of a vision 'bolt-on' EQ-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L + V) with SF-6D and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) to the benefit of cataract surgery. METHODS: Sixty-three patients were assessed before and after their cataract surgery using the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI3, as well as a 3-level and a 5-level vision dimension. Preference-based indices were calculated using available value sets for EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-3L + V, EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, and HUI3, and non-preference-based indices were calculated using the sum-score method for EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-5L + V (vision bolt-on EQ-5D-5L). Responsiveness was assessed using the standardized response mean (SRM) and F-statistic. RESULTS: Among preference-based indices, mean changes from pre to post-surgery in EQ-5D-3L + V and EQ-5D-3L indices were 0.031 and 0.018, respectively. The mean changes for EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D and HUI3 indices were 0.020, 0.012 and 0.105, respectively. The SRM (F-statistic) for EQ-5D-3L + V and EQ-5D-3L indices were 0.458 (13.2) and 0.098 (0.6), respectively. The responsiveness of EQ-5D-3L + V was better than EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D; the responsiveness of HUI3 was better than all other measures. Using non-preference-based indices, mean change for EQ-5D-5L + V and EQ-5D-5L were 0.067 and 0.017, respectively. The corresponding SRM (F-statistic) were 0.709 (31.7) and 0.295 (5.4). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evidence from our study suggests that a vision 'bolt-on' may increase the responsiveness of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L to change in health outcomes experienced by patients undergoing cataract surgery. In absence of the preference-based vision bolt-on EQ-5D-5L index, HUI3 was the most responsive measure.

摘要

目的:(1)评估在 5 级 EQ-5D(EQ-5D-5L)和 3 级 EQ-5D(EQ-5D-3L)中添加视力维度(“附加组件”)对其反应能力的影响,(2)比较附加视力的 EQ-5D-3L(EQ-5D-3L+V)与 SF-6D 和健康效用指数第 3 版(HUI3)对白内障手术获益的反应能力。

方法:63 名患者在白内障手术后使用 EQ-5D-3L、EQ-5D-5L、SF-6D、HUI3 以及 3 级和 5 级视力维度进行了评估。使用 EQ-5D-3L、EQ-5D-3L+V、EQ-5D-5L、SF-6D 和 HUI3 的可用价值集计算偏好指数,使用 EQ-5D-5L 和 EQ-5D-5L+V(视觉附加 EQ-5D-5L)的总和评分法计算非偏好指数。使用标准化反应均值(SRM)和 F 统计量评估反应能力。

结果:在偏好指数中,EQ-5D-3L+V 和 EQ-5D-3L 指数从术前到术后的平均变化分别为 0.031 和 0.018。EQ-5D-5L、SF-6D 和 HUI3 指数的平均变化分别为 0.020、0.012 和 0.105。EQ-5D-3L+V 和 EQ-5D-3L 指数的 SRM(F 统计量)分别为 0.458(13.2)和 0.098(0.6)。EQ-5D-3L+V 的反应能力优于 EQ-5D-5L、SF-6D;HUI3 的反应能力优于所有其他测量指标。使用非偏好指数,EQ-5D-5L+V 和 EQ-5D-5L 的平均变化分别为 0.067 和 0.017。相应的 SRM(F 统计量)分别为 0.709(31.7)和 0.295(5.4)。

结论:我们的研究初步证据表明,附加视力“附加组件”可能会提高接受白内障手术的患者健康结果变化的 EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 的反应能力。在没有偏好的附加组件 EQ-5D-5L 指数的情况下,HUI3 是最敏感的指标。

相似文献

[1]
A vision 'bolt-on' increases the responsiveness of EQ-5D: preliminary evidence from a study of cataract surgery.

Eur J Health Econ. 2020-6

[2]
EQ-5D-5L is More Responsive than EQ-5D-3L to Treatment Benefit of Cataract Surgery.

Patient. 2019-8

[3]
Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients.

Qual Life Res. 2020-2-20

[4]
Validity and responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with health complaints attributed to their amalgam fillings: a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing amalgam removal.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021-4-17

[5]
Comparing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS in stroke patients.

Qual Life Res. 2015-6

[6]
Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets.

Med Decis Making. 2018-11

[7]
Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey.

Health Technol Assess. 2014-2

[8]
A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Dutch patients with fractures visiting a Fracture Liaison Service.

J Med Econ. 2022

[9]
Comparison of the preference-based EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Eur J Health Econ. 2015-12

[10]
Comparative Psychometric Performance of Common Generic Paediatric Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument Descriptive Systems: Results from the Australian Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison Study.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2024-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
The Cost-Effectiveness of an Intervention to Preserve Independence in People With Dementia (Vs. No Intervention): A Decision-Analytic (Markov) Model Analysis.

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025-7

[2]
Identifying and developing culturally relevant EQ-5D-5L bolt-on items for Chinese population: qualitative phase of a mixed-methods study.

Qual Life Res. 2025-7-19

[3]
Psychometric testing of two respiratory bolt-on items to EQ-5D-5L in patients with obstructive airway diseases.

Qual Life Res. 2025-7-3

[4]
Measuring the quality of life of patients with diabetic retinopathy in northern India: a comparison of generic and vision specific instruments.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025-2-21

[5]
Cross-cultural adaptation and content validation of the Singapore English version of EQ-5D-Y: a qualitative study.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024-9-27

[6]
Testing four cognition bolt-on items to the EQ-5D in a general Chinese population.

Eur J Health Econ. 2025-4

[7]
Sickle Eye Project: a cross-sectional, non-interventional study of the prevalence of visual impairment due to sickle cell retinopathy and maculopathy in the UK.

BMJ Open. 2024-2-28

[8]
Developing and testing culturally relevant bolt-on items for EQ-5D-5L in Chinese populations: a mixed-methods study protocol.

BMJ Open. 2024-1-29

[9]
Content validity of the EQ-5D-5L with skin irritation and self-confidence bolt-ons in patients with atopic dermatitis: a qualitative think-aloud study.

Qual Life Res. 2024-1

[10]
Comparison of three health-related quality of life instruments in relation to visual acuity: EQ-5D, 15D, and EUROHIS-QOL8.

Qual Life Res. 2023-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
Correspondence of directly reported and recalled health-related quality of life in a large heterogeneous sample of trauma patients.

Qual Life Res. 2019-7-30

[2]
Consistency Between Three Different Ways of Administering the Short Form 6 Dimension Version 2.

Value Health. 2019-5-17

[3]
EQ-5D-5L is More Responsive than EQ-5D-3L to Treatment Benefit of Cataract Surgery.

Patient. 2019-8

[4]
Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey.

Health Technol Assess. 2014-2

[5]
Development of a disease-specific version of the EQ-5D-5L for use in patients suffering from psoriasis: lessons learned from a feasibility study in the UK.

Value Health. 2013-11-11

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索