• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Public Preference for Electric Vehicle Incentive Policies in China: A Conjoint Analysis.公众对中国电动汽车激励政策的偏好:联合分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 2;17(1):318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010318.
2
Impact of regional temperature on the adoption of electric vehicles: an empirical study based on 20 provinces in China.区域温度对电动汽车采用率的影响:基于中国20个省份的实证研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(5):11443-11457. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22797-0. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
3
Driving change: Understanding consumers' reasons influencing electric vehicle adoption from the lens of behavioural reasoning theory.推动变革:从行为推理理论的角度理解影响电动汽车采用的消费者原因。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Oct;369:122277. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122277. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
4
A market modeling review study on predicting Malaysian consumer behavior towards widespread adoption of PHEV/EV.对预测马来西亚消费者对 PHEV/EV 广泛采用的市场建模回顾研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Aug;24(22):17955-17975. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9153-8. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
5
Moving towards sustainable purchase behavior: examining the determinants of consumers' intentions to adopt electric vehicles.迈向可持续的购买行为:消费者采用电动汽车意愿的决定因素研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(18):22535-22546. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08835-9. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
6
Is it worth promoting battery swapping? A social welfare perspective on provider- and consumer-side incentives.推广电池更换是否值得?从社会福利角度看供应商和消费者端激励措施。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Mar 15;330:117157. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117157. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
7
How can the recycling of power batteries for EVs be promoted in China? A multiparty cooperative game analysis.如何在中国推广电动汽车动力电池的回收利用?多方合作博弈分析。
Waste Manag. 2024 Sep 15;186:64-76. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2024.06.005. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
8
Promotion Policies for Electric Vehicle Diffusion in China Considering Dynamic Consumer Preferences: A Network-Based Evolutionary Analysis.考虑动态消费者偏好的中国电动汽车推广政策:基于网络的演化分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;19(9):5290. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095290.
9
How does experience impact the adoption willingness of battery electric vehicles? The role of psychological factors.经验如何影响电动汽车的采用意愿?心理因素的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(20):25230-25247. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08834-w. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
10
Optimal number of charging station and pricing strategy for the electric vehicle with component commonality considering consumer range anxiety.考虑消费者里程焦虑的具有部件通用性的电动汽车的最优充电站数量和定价策略。
PLoS One. 2023 May 8;18(5):e0283320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283320. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Public transport pricing incentive schemes in a competitive market.竞争市场中的公共交通定价激励机制。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 8;19(11):e0313439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313439. eCollection 2024.
2
An empirical investigation into the preferences of the elderly for user interface design in personal electronic health record systems.针对老年人对个人电子健康记录系统中用户界面设计偏好的实证研究。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Jan 29;5:1289904. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1289904. eCollection 2023.
3
Dual Carbon Goal-Based Quadrilateral Evolutionary Game: Study on the New Energy Vehicle Industry in China.基于双碳目标的四边形演化博弈:中国新能源汽车产业研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 12;20(4):3217. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043217.
4
Analysis of the Dilemma of Promoting Circular Logistics Packaging in China: A Stochastic Evolutionary Game-Based Approach.中国推广循环物流包装的困境分析:基于随机进化博弈的方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;19(12):7363. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127363.
5
Promotion Policies for Electric Vehicle Diffusion in China Considering Dynamic Consumer Preferences: A Network-Based Evolutionary Analysis.考虑动态消费者偏好的中国电动汽车推广政策:基于网络的演化分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;19(9):5290. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095290.
6
An evolutionary analysis of new energy and industry policy tools in China based on large-scale policy topic modeling.基于大规模政策主题建模的中国新能源与产业政策工具的演进分析。
PLoS One. 2021 May 28;16(5):e0252502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252502. eCollection 2021.
7
The Impact of Consumer Subsidy on Green Technology Innovations for Vehicles and Environmental Impact.消费者补贴对车辆绿色技术创新和环境影响的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 15;17(20):7518. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207518.
8
Impact of product subsidies on R&D investment for new energy vehicle firms: Considering quality preference of the early adopter group.产品补贴对新能源汽车企业研发投资的影响:考虑早期采用者群体的质量偏好。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 31;15(7):e0236626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236626. eCollection 2020.
9
Electric Vehicle Charging Station Location towards Sustainable Cities.电动汽车充电站选址与可持续城市
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 17;17(8):2785. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082785.

本文引用的文献

1
Harmful Compounds and Willingness to Buy for Reduced-Additives Salami. An Outlook on Italian Consumers.有害化合物与购买低添加剂萨拉米香肠的意愿。意大利消费者的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 22;16(14):2605. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142605.
2
Decoupling effect and forecasting of economic growth and energy structure under the peak constraint of carbon emissions in China.中国碳排放峰值约束下经济增长与能源结构的脱钩效应及预测。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Sep;25(25):25255-25268. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2520-2. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
3
The impact of urbanization on CO emissions in China: an empirical study using 1980-2014 provincial data.城市化对中国 CO 排放的影响:基于 1980-2014 年省级面板数据的实证研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jan;25(3):2457-2465. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0662-2. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
4
Eliciting preferences for medical devices in South Korea: A discrete choice experiment.了解韩国对医疗设备的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Health Policy. 2017 Mar;121(3):243-249. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

公众对中国电动汽车激励政策的偏好:联合分析。

Public Preference for Electric Vehicle Incentive Policies in China: A Conjoint Analysis.

机构信息

Business School, Jiangsu Normal University, No.101 Shanghai Road, Xuzhou 221116, China.

School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, No.1 Daxue Road, Xuzhou 221116, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 2;17(1):318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010318.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17010318
PMID:31906526
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6981758/
Abstract

In order to mitigate energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission in the transportation sector, countries around the world have generally adopted electric vehicles (EVs) as a new development direction of the automobile industry. Although the Chinese government has issued a series of incentive policies to promote EVs, the ownership of EVs is still insufficient due to low public purchasing enthusiasm. Thus, to better realize the promotion goal of EVs, public preference for EV incentive policies is worth investigating. Based on a large sample survey (N = 1039), this study investigated public preference for various incentive policies by using the conjoint analysis method. The results suggest that less than one third of consumers have a better understanding of the incentive policies, while more than half of the consumers know little about these policies. For consumers, the relative importance of different policy categories is ranked as follows: charging incentive policies, driving incentive policies, vehicle registering incentive policies, and purchasing incentive policies. As for different socio-demographic groups, consumers aged 26-30 years, with a monthly income higher than RMB 20,000, with high school, special secondary school, and masters (or above) educational levels regarded the relative importance of driving incentive policies as the highest; consumers from two-member families ranked purchasing incentive policies as the first one; consumers with a monthly income of RMB 15,001-20,000 and those from three-member families place registering incentive policies first; other consumers put charging incentive policies first. Based on the above results, this paper offers policy recommendations for improving consumer knowledge level of incentive policies as well as full consideration of their policy demands.

摘要

为了减轻交通运输部门的能源消耗和温室气体排放,世界各国普遍将电动汽车(EV)作为汽车工业的新发展方向。尽管中国政府出台了一系列激励政策来促进电动汽车的发展,但由于公众购买积极性不高,电动汽车的拥有量仍然不足。因此,为了更好地实现电动汽车的推广目标,有必要调查公众对电动汽车激励政策的偏好。本研究基于一项大规模样本调查(N=1039),采用联合分析方法调查了公众对各种激励政策的偏好。结果表明,不到三分之一的消费者对激励政策有更好的了解,而超过一半的消费者对这些政策知之甚少。对于消费者来说,不同政策类别的相对重要性依次为:充电激励政策、驾驶激励政策、车辆注册激励政策和购车激励政策。对于不同的社会人口群体,26-30 岁的消费者、月收入高于 20,000 元的消费者、高中、中专和硕士(或以上)学历的消费者认为驾驶激励政策的相对重要性最高;两人家庭的消费者将购车激励政策排在首位;月收入为 15,001-20,000 元和三人家庭的消费者将注册激励政策放在首位;其他消费者则将充电激励政策放在首位。基于上述结果,本文提出了提高消费者对激励政策了解程度和充分考虑其政策需求的政策建议。