Suppr超能文献

在社区中使用为期7天的抗菌疗程治疗尿路感染的矛盾之处。

The paradox of using a 7 day antibacterial course to treat urinary tract infections in the community.

作者信息

Cheung R, Sullens C M, Seal D, Dickins J, Nicholson P W, Deshmukh A A, Denham M J, Dobbs S M

机构信息

Clinical Research Centre, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988 Oct;26(4):391-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1988.tb03396.x.

Abstract
  1. We have studied determinants of outcome of 7 day courses of treatment in 77 middle aged and elderly patients, in whom the general practitioner's diagnosis of urinary tract infections had been confirmed microbiologically. Bacteria were sensitive to cephalexin or trimethoprim. Where there was no preference, treatments were allocated randomly. Compliance was monitored using a pill box with a concealed electronic device which recorded openings of the box. 2. Prescribing trimethoprim, 200 mg twice daily, was more effective than cephalexin, 250 mg four times daily (cure rates 93 and 67%) (P less than 0.006). Those cured and not cured were not distinguished by age, gender, genitourinary history, or infecting organism. 3. Compliance as measured by box openings was worse for cephalexin than for trimethopim (P = 0.01). However, both totality and pattern of compliance were similar in patients cured and not cured by cephalexin. Thus rigid adherence to a conventional course did not promote cure: fewer doses could have been prescribed. 4. Estimating compliance is essential to clinical trials where medication is self-administered. Poor compliance may establish over exacting regimens. Counting box openings did overestimate compliance, but counting residual tablets overestimated it grossly: given the number of openings less than the ideal, there should have been 171 residual tablets, only 55 were found.
摘要
  1. 我们研究了77例中老年患者接受为期7天治疗的结果决定因素,这些患者经微生物学确诊为全科医生诊断的尿路感染。细菌对头孢氨苄或甲氧苄啶敏感。在没有偏好的情况下,治疗随机分配。使用带有隐藏电子设备的药盒监测依从性,该设备记录药盒的开启情况。2. 每日两次服用200毫克甲氧苄啶比每日四次服用250毫克头孢氨苄更有效(治愈率分别为93%和67%)(P小于0.006)。治愈和未治愈的患者在年龄、性别、泌尿生殖系统病史或感染病原体方面没有差异。3. 通过药盒开启情况衡量的依从性,头孢氨苄组比甲氧苄啶组更差(P = 0.01)。然而,头孢氨苄治愈和未治愈患者的依从性总体情况和模式相似。因此,严格遵循传统疗程并不能促进治愈:可以少开一些剂量。4. 在患者自行给药的临床试验中,估计依从性至关重要。依从性差可能是由于方案过于严格造成的。计算药盒开启次数确实高估了依从性,但计算剩余药片数量则严重高估了依从性:鉴于开启次数少于理想次数,本应有171片剩余药片,而实际只发现了55片。
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1127/1386559/8d797e9f777e/brjclinpharm00094-0058-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验