Suppr超能文献

青少年对基于学校的身体活动干预的看法:一项混合方法研究。

Adolescents' perspectives on a school-based physical activity intervention: A mixed method study.

机构信息

MRC Epidemiology Unit and UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.

出版信息

J Sport Health Sci. 2020 Jan;9(1):28-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine adolescent experiences and perspectives of the GoActive intervention (ISRCTN31583496) using mixed methods process evaluation to determine satisfaction with intervention components and interpret adolescents' experiences of the intervention process in order to provide insights for future intervention design.

METHODS

Participants ( = 1542; 13.2 ±  0.4 years, mean ± SD) provided questionnaire data at baseline (shyness, activity level) and post-intervention (intervention acceptability, satisfaction with components). Between-group differences (boys girls and shy/inactive others) were tested with linear regression models, accounting for school clustering. Data from 16 individual interviews (shy/inactive) and 11 focus groups with 48 participants (mean = 4; range 2-7) were thematically coded. Qualitative and quantitative data were merged in an integrative mixed methods convergence matrix, which denoted convergence and dissonance across datasets.

RESULTS

Effect sizes for quantitative results were small and may not represent substantial between-group differences. Boys ( girls) preferred class-based sessions ( = 0.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1-0.3); qualitative data suggested that this was because boys preferred competition, which was supported quantitatively ( = 0.2, 95%CI: 0.1-0.3). Shy/inactive students did not enjoy the competition ( = -0.3, 95%CI: -0.5 to -0.1). Boys enjoyed trying new activities more ( = 0.1, 95%CI: 0.1-0.2); qualitative data indicated a desire to try new activities across all subgroups but identified barriers to choosing unfamiliar activities with self-imposed choice restriction leading to boredom. Qualitative data highlighted critique of mentorship; adolescents liked the idea, but older mentors did not meet expectations.

CONCLUSION

We interpreted adolescent perspectives of intervention components and implementation to provide insights into future complex interventions aimed at increasing young people's physical activity in school-based settings. The intervention component mentorship was liked in principle, but implementation issues undesirably impacted satisfaction; competition was disliked by girls and shy/inactive students. The results highlight the importance of considering gender differences in preference of competition and extensive mentorship training.

摘要

目的

使用混合方法过程评估来研究青少年对 GoActive 干预(ISRCTN31583496)的体验和观点,以确定对干预内容的满意度,并解释青少年对干预过程的体验,为未来的干预设计提供参考。

方法

参与者(n=1542;13.2±0.4 岁,均值±标准差)在基线(害羞、活动水平)和干预后(干预可接受性、对各组成部分的满意度)提供问卷数据。使用线性回归模型检验组间差异(男孩与女孩、害羞/不活跃与其他),同时考虑到学校聚类。对 16 名害羞/不活跃青少年的个人访谈和 11 名 48 名参与者(平均年龄为 4 岁;范围为 2-7 岁)的焦点小组进行主题编码。对定量和定性数据进行合并,建立一个整合的混合方法收敛矩阵,以表示数据集中的收敛和分歧。

结果

定量结果的效应大小较小,可能不能代表组间的实质性差异。男孩(女孩)更喜欢基于课堂的课程(β=0.2,95%置信区间(CI):0.1-0.3);定性数据表明,这是因为男孩更喜欢竞争,这在定量上得到了支持(β=0.2,95%CI:0.1-0.3)。害羞/不活跃的学生不喜欢竞争(β=-0.3,95%CI:-0.5 至-0.1)。男孩更喜欢尝试新的活动(β=0.1,95%CI:0.1-0.2);定性数据表明,所有亚组都希望尝试新的活动,但发现选择不熟悉的活动存在障碍,自我限制选择导致无聊。定性数据突出了对指导的批评;青少年喜欢这个想法,但年长的导师没有达到预期。

结论

我们解释了青少年对干预内容和实施的看法,为未来旨在提高青少年在学校环境中体育活动的复杂干预提供了参考。干预内容中的指导原则上受到欢迎,但实施问题令人不满意地影响了满意度;竞争不受女孩和害羞/不活跃学生的欢迎。研究结果强调了考虑性别差异在竞争偏好和广泛的指导培训方面的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d53/6943775/f446d940edb5/fx1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验