UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Physical Education. Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, Brazil.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 7;17(2):390. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020390.
We assessed which intervention components were associated with change in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and wellbeing through proposed psychosocial mediators. Eight schools ( = 1319; 13-14 years) ran GoActive, where older mentors and in-class-peer-leaders encouraged classes to conduct two new activities/week; students gained points and rewards for activity. We assessed exposures: participant-perceived engagement with components (post-intervention): older mentorship, peer leadership, class sessions, competition, rewards, points entered online; potential mediators (change from baseline): social support, self-efficacy, group cohesion, friendship quality, self-esteem; and outcomes (change from baseline): accelerometer-assessed MVPA (min/day), wellbeing (Warwick-Edinburgh). Mediation was assessed using linear regression models stratified by gender (adjusted for age, ethnicity, language, school, BMI z-score, baseline values), assessing associations between (1) exposures and mediators, (2) exposures and outcomes (without mediators) and (3) exposure and mediator with outcome using bootstrap resampling. No evidence was found to support the use of these components to increase physical activity. Among boys, higher perceived teacher and mentor support were associated with improved wellbeing via various mediators. Among girls, higher perceived mentor support and perception of competition and rewards were positively associated with wellbeing via self-efficacy, self-esteem and social support. If implemented well, mentorship could increase wellbeing among adolescents. Teacher support and class-based activity sessions may be important for boys' wellbeing, whereas rewards and competition warrant consideration among girls.
我们评估了通过拟议的心理社会中介,哪些干预成分与中等到剧烈的身体活动 (MVPA) 和幸福感的变化有关。八所学校(=1319;13-14 岁)开展了 GoActive,其中年长的导师和课堂内的同龄领导鼓励班级每周进行两项新活动;学生可以通过活动获得积分和奖励。我们评估了暴露因素:参与者对干预组成部分的感知参与程度(干预后):年长的导师指导、同龄领导、班级课程、竞赛、奖励、在线输入的积分;潜在的中介因素(从基线开始的变化):社会支持、自我效能感、团体凝聚力、友谊质量、自尊;以及结果(从基线开始的变化):计步器评估的 MVPA(分钟/天)、幸福感(华威-爱丁堡)。采用线性回归模型分层评估中介,按性别进行调整(调整年龄、种族、语言、学校、BMI z 分数、基线值),评估(1)暴露因素和中介因素之间的关联,(2)暴露因素和结果(没有中介因素)之间的关联,(3)暴露因素和中介因素与结果之间的关联,使用自举重采样。没有证据支持使用这些成分来增加身体活动。在男孩中,较高的感知教师和导师支持与通过各种中介因素改善幸福感有关。在女孩中,较高的感知导师支持以及对竞争和奖励的感知与通过自我效能感、自尊和社会支持来改善幸福感有关。如果实施得当,导师制可以提高青少年的幸福感。教师支持和基于课堂的活动课程可能对男孩的幸福感很重要,而奖励和竞争则需要在女孩中考虑。