• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估惊恐易感性:对生物挑战的心理和生理反应作为惊恐发作和惊恐障碍前瞻性预测指标的系统评价。

Assessing vulnerability to panic: a systematic review of psychological and physiological responses to biological challenges as prospective predictors of panic attacks and panic disorder.

作者信息

Robinaugh Donald J, Ward Meredith J, Toner Emma R, Brown Mackenzie L, Losiewicz Olivia M, Bui Eric, Orr Scott P

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Gen Psychiatr. 2019 Dec 23;32(6):e100140. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2019-100140. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1136/gpsych-2019-100140
PMID:31922089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6936969/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive-behavioural theories of panic disorder posit that panic attacks arise from a positive feedback loop between arousal-related bodily sensations and perceived threat. In a recently developed computational model formalising these theories of panic attacks, it was observed that the response to a simulated perturbation to arousal provided a strong indicator of vulnerability to panic attacks and panic disorder. In this review, we evaluate whether this observation is borne out in the empirical literature that has examined responses to biological challenge (eg, CO inhalation) and their relation to subsequent panic attacks and panic disorder.

METHOD

We searched PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO using keywords denoting provocation agents (eg, sodium lactate) and procedures (eg, infusion) combined with keywords relevant to panic disorder (eg, panic). Articles were eligible if they used response to a biological challenge paradigm to prospectively predict panic attacks or panic disorder.

RESULTS

We identified four eligible studies. Pooled effect sizes suggest that there is biological challenge response has a moderate prospective association with subsequent panic attacks, but no prospective relationship with panic disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide support for the prediction derived from cognitive-behavioural theories and some preliminary evidence that response to a biological challenge may have clinical utility as a marker of vulnerability to panic attacks pending further research and development.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

摘要

背景

惊恐障碍的认知行为理论认为,惊恐发作源于与唤醒相关的身体感觉和感知到的威胁之间的正反馈回路。在最近开发的一个将这些惊恐发作理论形式化的计算模型中,观察到对模拟唤醒扰动的反应是易患惊恐发作和惊恐障碍的一个有力指标。在本综述中,我们评估这一观察结果是否在检验对生物挑战(如吸入一氧化碳)的反应及其与随后惊恐发作和惊恐障碍关系的实证文献中得到证实。

方法

我们在PubMed、科学网和PsycINFO中进行搜索,使用表示激发剂(如乳酸钠)和程序(如输注)的关键词,并结合与惊恐障碍相关的关键词(如惊恐)。如果文章使用对生物挑战范式的反应来前瞻性地预测惊恐发作或惊恐障碍,则符合入选标准。

结果

我们确定了四项符合条件的研究。合并效应量表明,生物挑战反应与随后的惊恐发作有中度的前瞻性关联,但与惊恐障碍没有前瞻性关系。

结论

这些发现为认知行为理论得出的预测提供了支持,并有一些初步证据表明,对生物挑战的反应作为易患惊恐发作的标志物可能具有临床应用价值,有待进一步研究和开发。

试验注册号

135908。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed4d/6936969/5d69384993db/gpsych-2019-100140f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed4d/6936969/5d69384993db/gpsych-2019-100140f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed4d/6936969/5d69384993db/gpsych-2019-100140f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing vulnerability to panic: a systematic review of psychological and physiological responses to biological challenges as prospective predictors of panic attacks and panic disorder.评估惊恐易感性:对生物挑战的心理和生理反应作为惊恐发作和惊恐障碍前瞻性预测指标的系统评价。
Gen Psychiatr. 2019 Dec 23;32(6):e100140. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2019-100140. eCollection 2019.
2
Comparison of Sodium Lactate Infusion and Carbon Dioxide Inhalation Panic Provocation Tests: A Meta-analysis.乳酸钠输注与二氧化碳吸入惊恐激发试验比较的 Meta 分析。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2022 Mar;55(2):87-94. doi: 10.1055/a-1589-6049. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
3
Correction: .更正:.
Gen Psychiatr. 2020 Apr 16;33(2):e100140corr1. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2019-100140corr1. eCollection 2020.
4
The effect of Korean-group cognitive behavioural therapy among patients with panic disorder in clinic settings.韩国团体认知行为疗法对临床环境中惊恐障碍患者的疗效。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Feb;24(1):28-40. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12337. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
5
[Experimental possibilities of biological provocation of panic attacks].
Psychiatr Prax. 1990 Jan;17(1):29-33.
6
Effects of caffeine on anxiety and panic attacks in patients with panic disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.咖啡因对惊恐障碍患者焦虑和惊恐发作的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2022 Jan-Feb;74:22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
7
Onset of spontaneous panic attacks: a prospective study of risk factors.自发性惊恐发作的起病:一项危险因素的前瞻性研究。
Psychosom Med. 2006 Sep-Oct;68(5):754-7. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000232268.00327.b4.
8
Prospective evaluation of panic potentiation following 35% CO2 challenge in nonclinical subjects.非临床受试者中35%二氧化碳激发后惊恐增强的前瞻性评估。
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Jun;153(6):823-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.6.823.
9
Diagnostic Utility of Sodium Lactate Infusion and CO2-35% Inhalation for Panic Disorder.静脉乳酸钠输注和 CO2-35% 吸入对惊恐障碍的诊断效用。
Neuropsychobiology. 2019;78(2):59-69. doi: 10.1159/000499136. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
10
The cognitive theory of panic disorder: A systematic narrative review.惊恐障碍的认知理论:系统叙述性综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2024 Nov;113:102483. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102483. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Candidate biomarkers in psychiatric disorders: state of the field.精神疾病中的候选生物标志物:该领域的现状。
World Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;22(2):236-262. doi: 10.1002/wps.21078.
2
Cardiorespiratory Assessments in Panic Disorder Facilitated by Wearable Devices: A Systematic Review and Brief Comparison of the Wearable Zephyr BioPatch with the Quark-b2 Stationary Testing System.可穿戴设备辅助的惊恐障碍心肺评估:可穿戴Zephyr生物贴片与夸克-b2静态测试系统的系统评价及简要比较
Brain Sci. 2023 Mar 16;13(3):502. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030502.
3
Panic Attack Prediction Using Wearable Devices and Machine Learning: Development and Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Power analysis for random-effects meta-analysis.随机效应荟萃分析的功效分析。
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Sep;8(3):290-302. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1240. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
2
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
3
Examining the latent class structure of CO2 hypersensitivity using time course trajectories of panic response systems.利用惊恐反应系统的时间进程轨迹研究二氧化碳超敏反应的潜在类别结构。
使用可穿戴设备和机器学习进行惊恐发作预测:开发与队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Feb 15;10(2):e33063. doi: 10.2196/33063.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;47:68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
4
Correlational effect size benchmarks.相关效应量基准。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Mar;100(2):431-49. doi: 10.1037/a0038047. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
5
An international registry of systematic-review protocols.一个系统评价方案的国际注册库。
Lancet. 2011 Jan 8;377(9760):108-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60903-8. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
6
Reactivity to challenge with carbon dioxide as a prospective predictor of panic attacks.二氧化碳激发反应作为惊恐发作的一种潜在预测指标
Psychiatry Res. 2007 May 30;151(1-2):173-6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.11.006. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
7
Anxiety sensitivity and CO2 challenge reactivity as unique and interactive prospective predictors of anxiety pathology.焦虑敏感性和二氧化碳激发反应性作为焦虑症的独特及交互性前瞻性预测因素。
Depress Anxiety. 2007;24(8):527-36. doi: 10.1002/da.20267.
8
Onset of spontaneous panic attacks: a prospective study of risk factors.自发性惊恐发作的起病:一项危险因素的前瞻性研究。
Psychosom Med. 2006 Sep-Oct;68(5):754-7. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000232268.00327.b4.
9
A long-term prospective evaluation of first-degree relatives of panic patients who underwent the 35% CO2 challenge.对接受35%二氧化碳激发试验的惊恐症患者一级亲属的长期前瞻性评估。
Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Feb 1;45(3):365-7. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00030-4.
10
Prospective evaluation of panic potentiation following 35% CO2 challenge in nonclinical subjects.非临床受试者中35%二氧化碳激发后惊恐增强的前瞻性评估。
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Jun;153(6):823-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.6.823.