Suppr超能文献

在印度农村一项水干预试验中,干预措施采用和健康报告的障碍和促进因素:一项定性解释性研究。

Barriers and Enablers to Intervention Uptake and Health Reporting in a Water Intervention Trial in Rural India: A Qualitative Explanatory Study.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), Panaji, India.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Mar;102(3):507-517. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0486.

Abstract

Consumption of unsafe drinking water contributes to the global disease burden, necessitating identification and implementation of effective, acceptable, and sustainable water interventions in resource-limited settings. In a quantitative stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of a community-based water intervention in rural India, we identified low rates of intervention uptake and reported diarrhea. To better understand and explain these findings, we performed a qualitative study examining barriers and enablers to intervention uptake and health reporting using the COM-B model, where capabilities, opportunities, and motivators interact to generate behavior. We conducted 20 focus groups and one semi-structured interview with participants and four focus groups with data collectors. Multifactorial barriers to intervention uptake included distorted perceptions of water-related health effects, implementation issues that reduced treated water availability; convenience of, and preference for, alternative drinking water sources; delivery of water to plastic storage tanks (perceived as affecting water quality and taste); and resistance to change. Enablers included knowledge of water-related health risks, proximity to tanks, and social opportunity. Barriers to health reporting included variability in interpretation of illness, suspicion regarding the consequences of reporting disease, weariness with repeated questions, and perceived inaction on health data already provided; low survey implementation fidelity was also important. Enablers included surveyor initiatives to encourage reporting and a sense of social responsibility. This qualitative explanatory study allowed better understanding of our quantitative results. It also identified obstacles and facilitators to implementing and evaluating community water interventions, providing insight on how to achieve better intervention uptake and health reporting in future studies.

摘要

不安全饮用水的消费导致了全球疾病负担,因此需要在资源有限的环境中确定和实施有效、可接受和可持续的水干预措施。在印度农村一项基于社区的水干预措施的定量阶梯式楔形集群随机试验中,我们发现干预措施的采用率和腹泻报告率都很低。为了更好地理解和解释这些发现,我们使用 COM-B 模型进行了一项定性研究,该模型考察了采用干预措施和报告健康状况的障碍和促进因素,其中能力、机会和动机相互作用产生行为。我们对参与者进行了 20 次焦点小组讨论和一次半结构化访谈,并对数据收集员进行了 4 次焦点小组讨论。采用干预措施的多因素障碍包括对与水相关的健康影响的扭曲看法、实施问题减少了处理水的供应;替代饮用水源的便利性和偏好;将水输送到塑料储水箱(被认为会影响水质和口感);以及对变革的抵制。促进因素包括对与水相关的健康风险的了解、靠近水箱的位置和社会机会。健康报告的障碍包括对疾病的解释存在差异、对报告疾病后果的怀疑、对重复提问的厌倦以及对已提供的健康数据的行动不足的看法;低调查实施保真度也很重要。促进因素包括调查员采取措施鼓励报告以及社会责任感。这项定性解释性研究使我们能够更好地理解我们的定量结果。它还确定了实施和评估社区水干预措施的障碍和促进因素,为未来的研究如何实现更好的干预措施采用和健康报告提供了思路。

相似文献

3
Interventions to improve water quality for preventing diarrhoea.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 20;2015(10):CD004794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004794.pub3.
7
Lay health workers perceptions of an anemia control intervention in Karnataka, India: a qualitative study.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 18;17(1):720. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4758-x.
9
Beliefs and expectations of rural hospital practitioners towards a developing trauma system: A qualitative case study.
Injury. 2018 Jun;49(6):1070-1078. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.03.025. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

3
Reducing the user burden in WASH interventions for low-income countries.
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Sep;7(9):e1158-e1159. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30340-7.
4
The WASH Benefits and SHINE trials: interpretation of WASH intervention effects on linear growth and diarrhoea.
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Aug;7(8):e1139-e1146. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30268-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验