Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager-Hvidovre, Sports Orthopedic Research Center - Copenhagen (SORC-C), Hvidovre, Denmark
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager-Hvidovre, Sports Orthopedic Research Center - Copenhagen (SORC-C), Hvidovre, Denmark.
Br J Sports Med. 2020 May;54(9):528-537. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101228. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
This statement summarises and appraises the evidence on diagnosis, prevention and treatment of the most common lower extremity muscle injuries in sport. We systematically searched electronic databases, and included studies based on the highest available evidence. Subsequently, we evaluated the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework, grading the quality of evidence from high to very low. Most clinical tests showed very low to low diagnostic effectiveness. For hamstring injury prevention, programmes that included the Nordic hamstring exercise resulted in a hamstring injury risk reduction when compared with usual care (medium to large effect size; moderate to high quality of evidence). For prevention of groin injuries, both the FIFA 11+programme and the Copenhagen adductor strengthening programme resulted in a groin injury risk reduction compared with usual care (medium effect size; low to moderate quality of evidence). For the treatment of hamstring injuries, lengthening hamstring exercises showed the fastest return to play with a lower reinjury rate compared with conventional hamstring exercises (large effect size; very low to low quality of evidence). Platelet-rich plasma had no effect on time to return-to-play and reinjury risk (trivial effect size; moderate quality of evidence) after a hamstring injury compared with placebo or rehabilitation. At this point, most outcomes for diagnosis, prevention and treatment were graded as very low to moderate quality of evidence, indicating that further high-quality research is likely to have an important impact on the confidence in the effect estimates.
本声明总结和评估了运动中最常见下肢肌肉损伤的诊断、预防和治疗的证据。我们系统地搜索了电子数据库,并纳入了基于最高可用证据的研究。随后,我们使用推荐评估、制定和评估分级框架评估证据质量,将证据质量从高到极低进行分级。大多数临床检查的诊断效果都非常低或低。对于腘绳肌损伤预防,与常规护理相比,包含北欧式腘绳肌运动的方案可降低腘绳肌损伤风险(中到大效应量;中到高证据质量)。对于预防腹股沟损伤,国际足球联合会 11+方案和哥本哈根内收肌强化方案与常规护理相比均可降低腹股沟损伤风险(中效应量;低到中证据质量)。对于腘绳肌损伤的治疗,与常规腘绳肌运动相比,伸展腘绳肌运动可更快恢复运动,再次受伤的风险更低(大效应量;极低到低证据质量)。富血小板血浆(platelet-rich plasma)与安慰剂或康复治疗相比,在治疗腘绳肌损伤后,对重返赛场时间和再次受伤风险没有影响(微小效应量;中等质量证据)。目前,诊断、预防和治疗的大多数结果都被评为极低到中等质量证据,这表明进一步的高质量研究很可能对疗效评估的置信度产生重要影响。