• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从系统评价和定性研究的元综合中了解关于骨骼健康的知识、信念和关注点。

Knowledge, beliefs, and concerns about bone health from a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.

机构信息

Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.

Department of Gastroenterology Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0227765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227765. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0227765
PMID:31940409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6961946/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with low bone density or osteoporosis need information for effective prevention or disease management, respectively. However, patients may not be getting enough information from their primary care providers or other sources. Inadequate disease information leaves patients ill-informed and creates misconceptions and unnecessary concerns about the disease.

OBJECTIVE

We systematically reviewed and synthesized the available literature to determine patient knowledge, beliefs, and concerns about osteoporosis and identify potential gaps in knowledge.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted for full-text qualitative studies addressing understanding, literacy, and/or perceptions about osteoporosis and its management, using Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ERIC, PsychINFO, Psyc Behav Sci Collec, and PubMed, from inception through September 2016. Studies were selected by two reviewers, assessed for quality, and themes extracted using the Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction tool. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies with a total of 757 participants (including 105 men) were selected for analysis out of 1031 unique citations. Selected studies were from Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Four main themes emerged: inadequate knowledge, beliefs and misconceptions, concerns about osteoporosis, and lack of information from health care providers. Participants had inadequate knowledge about osteoporosis and were particularly uninformed about risk factors, causes, treatment, and prevention. Areas of concern for participants included diagnosis, medication side effects, and inadequate information from primary care providers.

CONCLUSION

Although there was general awareness of osteoporosis, many misconceptions and concerns were evident. Education on bone health needs to reinforce areas of knowledge and address deficits, misconceptions, and concerns.

摘要

背景

患有低骨密度或骨质疏松症的患者分别需要有效的预防或疾病管理信息。然而,患者可能无法从他们的初级保健提供者或其他来源获得足够的信息。疾病信息不足会使患者缺乏信息,产生误解,并对疾病产生不必要的担忧。

目的

我们系统地回顾和综合了现有的文献,以确定患者对骨质疏松症的知识、信念和关注点,并确定知识上的潜在差距。

方法

系统地搜索了全文定性研究,这些研究涉及对骨质疏松症及其管理的理解、读写能力和/或认知,使用了 Medline、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、ERIC、PsychINFO、Psyc Behav Sci Collec 和 PubMed,从成立到 2016 年 9 月。由两名评审员选择研究,评估其质量,并使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所数据提取工具提取主题。使用主题分析确定主题和子主题。

结果

从 1031 篇独特的引文中共选择了 25 项研究,共 757 名参与者(包括 105 名男性)进行分析。选定的研究来自澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、挪威、英国和美国。有四个主要主题:知识不足、信念和误解、对骨质疏松症的担忧以及缺乏来自医疗保健提供者的信息。参与者对骨质疏松症的知识不足,特别是对危险因素、病因、治疗和预防缺乏了解。参与者关注的领域包括诊断、药物副作用和初级保健提供者提供的信息不足。

结论

尽管人们普遍了解骨质疏松症,但仍存在许多误解和担忧。关于骨骼健康的教育需要加强知识领域,并解决知识、误解和担忧方面的不足。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47b4/6961946/bc5dea21b1eb/pone.0227765.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47b4/6961946/5217b288000b/pone.0227765.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47b4/6961946/c04e14630bea/pone.0227765.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47b4/6961946/bc5dea21b1eb/pone.0227765.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47b4/6961946/5217b288000b/pone.0227765.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47b4/6961946/c04e14630bea/pone.0227765.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47b4/6961946/bc5dea21b1eb/pone.0227765.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowledge, beliefs, and concerns about bone health from a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.从系统评价和定性研究的元综合中了解关于骨骼健康的知识、信念和关注点。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0227765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227765. eCollection 2020.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
3
The knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of patients and their healthcare professionals around oral dosage form modification: A systematic review of the qualitative literature.患者及其医护人员对口服剂型调整的知识、态度和信念:定性文献的系统综述
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Jul-Aug;13(4):717-726. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
4
Meta-Synthesis on Migraine Management.偏头痛管理的元综合。
Headache. 2018 Jan;58(1):22-44. doi: 10.1111/head.13212. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
5
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Women's experience of menopause: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.女性更年期经历:定性证据的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep 16;13(8):250-337. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1948.
8
Metasynthesis of Patient Attitudes Toward Bone Densitometry.患者对骨密度测定态度的综合分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1796-1804. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4587-3. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
9
Expressed information needs of patients with osteoporosis and/or fragility fractures: a systematic review.骨质疏松症和/或脆性骨折患者的表达信息需求:系统评价。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 May 8;13(1):55. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0470-4.
10
The experiences of midwives and nurses collaborating to provide birthing care: a systematic review.助产士与护士合作提供分娩护理的经验:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):74-127. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2444.

引用本文的文献

1
Burden of Disease and Treatment Gap in Patients with an Osteoporotic Hip Fracture between 2015 and 2019 in Italy.2015年至2019年意大利骨质疏松性髋部骨折患者的疾病负担与治疗差距
Drugs Aging. 2025 Jul;42(7):643-653. doi: 10.1007/s40266-025-01211-7. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
2
Association between Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and all-cause mortality in individuals with osteoporotic fractures: a retrospective cohort study.老年营养风险指数与骨质疏松性骨折患者全因死亡率之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Mar 11;37(1):77. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-02978-w.
3
Patient perceptions of osteoporosis management: a qualitative pilot study by a patient advisory group.

本文引用的文献

1
Race Plays a Role in the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs of Women with Osteoporosis.种族在骨质疏松症女性的知识、态度和信仰中起作用。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Aug;6(4):707-718. doi: 10.1007/s40615-019-00569-w. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
2
Women's perspectives and experiences on screening for osteoporosis (Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation, ROSE).女性对骨质疏松症筛查的看法和经历(风险分层骨质疏松症策略评估,ROSE)。
Arch Osteoporos. 2014;9:192. doi: 10.1007/s11657-014-0192-1. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
3
Non-pharmacological strategies used by patients at high risk for future fracture to manage fracture risk--a qualitative study.
患者对骨质疏松症管理的认知:患者咨询小组开展的一项定性试点研究
Arch Osteoporos. 2025 Jan 15;20(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01486-0.
4
Opportunistic Screening of Bone Fragility Using Computed Tomography.利用计算机断层扫描进行骨质疏松症的机会性筛查。
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2024 Oct;28(5):620-627. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788816. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
5
Bone mineral density is not associated with incident high-intensity back pain: a 10-year cohort study in men.骨密度与高强度背痛的发生无关:一项针对男性的10年队列研究。
JBMR Plus. 2024 Jun 10;8(8):ziae076. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae076. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Evaluation of an mHealth App on Self-Management of Osteoporosis: Prospective Survey Study.一款移动健康应用程序对骨质疏松症自我管理的评估:前瞻性调查研究。
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Apr 1;13:e53995. doi: 10.2196/53995.
7
The experience of feeling old after a fragility fracture.脆性骨折后感觉变老的体验。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Feb 22;24(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04769-w.
8
Educational Needs for Coaching Judo in Older Adults: The EdJCO Focus Groups.老年人柔道教练的教育需求:EdJCO焦点小组
Sports (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;11(8):143. doi: 10.3390/sports11080143.
9
Bone health assessment with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in men with high-risk prostate carcinoma commencing adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy.对开始辅助雄激素剥夺治疗的高危前列腺癌男性患者进行双能X线吸收法骨健康评估。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022 Sep 19;27(4):677-683. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0069. eCollection 2022.
10
Adherence to Lifestyle Recommendations for Bone Health in Older Adults with and without Osteoporosis: Cross-Sectional Results of the OUTDOOR ACTIVE Study.骨健康生活方式建议在骨质疏松症和非骨质疏松症老年患者中的依从性:户外主动研究的横断面结果。
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 14;14(12):2463. doi: 10.3390/nu14122463.
高骨折风险患者用于管理骨折风险的非药物策略——一项定性研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Jan;25(1):281-8. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2405-7. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
4
Osteoporosis knowledge, health beliefs, and healthy bone behaviours in patients on androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer.骨质疏松症知识、健康信念和前列腺癌雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)患者的健康骨骼行为。
BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(8):1301-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11777.x. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
5
How do osteoporosis patients perceive their illness and treatment? Implications for clinical practice.骨质疏松症患者如何看待自己的疾病和治疗?对临床实践的启示。
Arch Osteoporos. 2012;7:115-24. doi: 10.1007/s11657-012-0089-9. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
6
Handling knowledge on osteoporosis--a qualitative study.骨质疏松症知识的掌握——一项定性研究
Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Sep;27(3):516-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01055.x. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
7
Factors affecting adherence to osteoporosis medications: a focus group approach examining viewpoints of patients and providers.影响骨质疏松症药物治疗依从性的因素:采用焦点小组方法探讨患者和提供者的观点。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2011 Apr-Jun;34(2):72-81. doi: 10.1097/JPT.0b013e3181ff03b4.
8
The invisible disease: making sense of an osteoporosis diagnosis in older age.隐形的疾病:理解老年骨质疏松症诊断
Qual Health Res. 2011 Dec;21(12):1692-704. doi: 10.1177/1049732311416825. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
9
Older men's explanatory model for osteoporosis.老年人骨质疏松症的解释模型。
Gerontologist. 2011 Aug;51(4):530-9. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq123. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
10
Older women's views about prescription osteoporosis medication: a cross-sectional, qualitative study.老年女性对处方骨质疏松症药物的看法:一项横断面、定性研究。
Drugs Aging. 2010 Dec 1;27(12):999-1008. doi: 10.2165/11584790-000000000-00000.