Suppr超能文献

儿童注意缺陷多动障碍的运动困难:比较长式和短式布鲁金斯-奥塞尔斯基运动技能测试第二版(BOT-2)。

Movement difficulties in children with ADHD: Comparing the long- and short-form Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition (BOT-2).

机构信息

Complex Attention and Hyperactivity Disorders (CAHDS), Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, Department of Health, Perth, WA, Australia.

Discipline of Psychological Sciences, Australian College of Applied Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Occup Ther J. 2020 Apr;67(2):153-161. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12641. Epub 2020 Jan 16.

Abstract

AIMS

Up to 50% of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) also present with difficulties with motor proficiency. Several assessments of motor proficiency are available for occupational therapists, though the validity of these measures in an ADHD population requires further exploration. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the consistency of scores obtained using the long-form and short-form of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition (BOT-2) in a school-age ADHD sample.

METHOD

The BOT-2 long-form was administered to 84 school-age children (78 males) with ADHD; short-form scores were extracted from the relevant long-form items.

RESULTS

Long-form and short-form total scores were highly correlated (r = .87), though the average short-form score was significantly higher. As a categorical measure, 52 children were classified as "at-risk" for movement difficulties by the long-form; but only 36 by the short-form, yielding a false-negative rate of 30.77%. The sensitivity of short-form could be improved by raising the cut-off thresholds of short-form scores as identified by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis but did not yield practical utility.

INTERPRETATION

As a continuous indicator (i.e. total scores), the short-form is comparable to the long-form. However, the short-form overestimates the child's motor proficiency relative to the long-form and yields an unacceptably high rate of false negatives as a categorical measure. The current revision of the short-form is therefore not recommended as a screening nor diagnostic instrument in an ADHD population. In the absence of ADHD-specific norms, use of the long-form provides greater opportunity for occupational therapists to identify those at-risk for movement difficulties. However, any assessment of motor proficiency should be accompanied by a broader comprehensive assessment to best understand a child's motor functioning.

摘要

目的

多达 50%的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童也存在运动技能障碍。职业治疗师有几种运动技能评估方法,但这些方法在 ADHD 人群中的有效性需要进一步探索。本文旨在评估在 ADHD 儿童样本中,使用 Bruininks-Oseretsky 运动技能测试第二版(BOT-2)长式和短式获得的分数的一致性。

方法

对 84 名患有 ADHD 的学龄儿童(78 名男性)进行了 BOT-2 长式测试;从相关的长式项目中提取了短式分数。

结果

长式和短式总分高度相关(r=.87),尽管短式的平均分数明显较高。作为一种分类测量方法,52 名儿童被长式归类为运动困难的“高危”人群;但只有 36 名儿童被短式归类,假阴性率为 30.77%。通过接收者操作特征曲线分析确定的短式得分截断阈值提高,可以提高短式的敏感性,但没有产生实际效用。

解释

作为一个连续指标(即总分),短式与长式相当。然而,与长式相比,短式高估了儿童的运动技能,并且作为一种分类测量方法,产生了不可接受的高假阴性率。因此,目前的短式修订版本不建议作为 ADHD 人群的筛查或诊断工具。在没有 ADHD 特异性规范的情况下,使用长式为职业治疗师提供了更多机会来识别那些有运动困难风险的人。然而,任何运动技能评估都应辅以更广泛的综合评估,以更好地了解儿童的运动功能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验