Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jan 16;63(1):274-285. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00187. Print 2020 Jan 22.
Purpose Previous investigations reveal that children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) produce elevated rates of linguistic mazes (i.e., filled pauses, repetitions, revisions, and/or abandoned utterances) in expressive language samples (Redmond, 2004). The current study aimed to better understand maze use of children and adolescents with ADHD with a focus on the specific maze types produced in different language sampling contexts based on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2; Lord et al., 2012). Method Participants included twenty-five 4- to 13-year-olds with a confirmed diagnosis of ADHD. Each participant completed the ADOS to provide narrative and conversational language samples. Research assistants transcribed at least 100 utterances from the ADOS using Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (Miller & Chapman, 2000) conventions. Dependent variables included the rates of repetitions, revisions, filled pauses, content mazes (Thordardottir & Ellis Weismer, 2002), and stalls (Rispoli, 2003; Rispoli, Hadley, & Holt, 2008) produced in narrative and conversational portions of the ADOS. Results In the full sample, participants produced a significantly greater rate of revisions than filled pauses ( = .01) and repetitions ( < .01). Participants also produced a significantly lower rate of filled pauses than content mazes ( < .01). Across contexts, participants produced a higher rate of filled pauses in conversational versus narrative contexts. Age was positively correlated with revisions and content mazes. Mean length of utterance was positively correlated with revisions, repetitions, and context mazes. Expressive language ability was positively correlated with filled pauses and stalls. Conclusion The children and adolescents in our sample demonstrated a unique profile of maze use. Sampling context had a limited influence on maze use, whereas maze use was impacted by age, mean length of utterance, and expressive language ability. Study findings highlight the importance of analyzing maze types separately rather than as a single category.
先前的研究表明,患有注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童在表达性语言样本中产生更高比率的语言迷宫(即填充停顿、重复、修订和/或未完成的话语)(Redmond,2004)。本研究旨在更深入地了解患有 ADHD 的儿童和青少年的迷宫使用情况,重点关注根据自闭症诊断观察量表(ADOS-2;Lord 等人,2012)在不同语言采样情境中产生的特定迷宫类型。
参与者包括 25 名 4 至 13 岁被确诊为 ADHD 的儿童。每位参与者都完成了 ADOS,以提供叙述和会话语言样本。研究助理使用系统分析语言记录(Miller 和 Chapman,2000)的约定,从 ADOS 转录至少 100 个话语。因变量包括在叙述和会话部分的 ADOS 中产生的重复率、修订率、填充停顿率、内容迷宫率(Thordardottir 和 Ellis Weismer,2002)和停顿率(Rispoli,2003;Rispoli,Hadley 和 Holt,2008)。
在整个样本中,参与者的修订率明显高于填充停顿率( <.01)和重复率( <.01)。参与者的填充停顿率也明显低于内容迷宫率( <.01)。在所有情境中,参与者在会话情境中比在叙述情境中产生更高的填充停顿率。年龄与修订和内容迷宫呈正相关。话语平均长度与修订、重复和语境迷宫呈正相关。表达性语言能力与填充停顿和停顿呈正相关。
我们样本中的儿童和青少年表现出独特的迷宫使用模式。采样情境对迷宫使用的影响有限,而年龄、话语平均长度和表达性语言能力会影响迷宫使用。研究结果强调了分别分析迷宫类型而不是作为单一类别进行分析的重要性。