Wallace E R
Psychiatry. 1977 Feb;40(1):79-87. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1977.11023922.
Many writers have commented on the lack of Freud's usual level of logic and powers of persuasion in Moses and Monotheism. The majority attribute it to the significance of dynamic determinants in Freud himself--most notably, identification with Moses. Fromm (1972) says "one must assume that Freud's preoccupation with Moses was rooted in the deep unconscious identification with him" (p. 79). Unfortunately, the situation is much more complex. Although many pertinent observations have been made, what is needed is a detailed dissection of the text, a correlation with elements from Freud's personal life, and an overall psychoanalytic synthesis of the data. This paper makes a beginning in that direction, incorporating the ideas of other investigators with those of the author--but it is hoped that much more detailed analysis and biographical correlation will follow. There is a wealth of information about Freud in Moses and Monotheism and no one paper will exhaust it. In this examination no attempt will be made to evaluate Moses and Monotheism for its literary, psychohistorical, or scientific merit. The focus is on the psychodynamic determinants of Freud's essay.
许多作家都评论过弗洛伊德在《摩西与一神教》中缺乏其惯常的逻辑水平和说服力。大多数人将其归因于弗洛伊德自身动力学决定因素的重要性——最显著的是与摩西的认同。弗洛姆（1972）说：“人们必须假定，弗洛伊德对摩西的专注源于他与摩西在深层无意识层面的认同”（第79页）。不幸的是，情况要复杂得多。尽管已经有了许多相关的观察，但我们需要对文本进行详细剖析，将其与弗洛伊德个人生活中的元素联系起来，并对这些数据进行全面的精神分析综合。本文朝着这个方向迈出了第一步，将其他研究者的观点与作者的观点结合起来——但希望随后会有更详细的分析和与传记的关联。在《摩西与一神教》中有关于弗洛伊德的丰富信息，一篇论文是无法穷尽的。在这次考察中，不会尝试对《摩西与一神教》的文学、心理史学或科学价值进行评估。重点是弗洛伊德这篇论文的心理动力学决定因素。
