Dor-Shav N K
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1977 Nov;56(5):407-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1977.tb06681.x.
The paper presents the position that Freud was not torn by the conflict "To be or not to be a Jew" as some have contended, but, rather, that he had resolved upon "to be ...", and did not long to reject his Jewish identity. What is maintained here is that evidence cited in support of supposed ambivalence regarding Jewish identity is better interpreted in terms of Freud's life-long ambivalence toward his father, his drive to denigrate and destroy him. Evidence is brough that it is his father, rather than himself, whom Freud identifies with the Moses figure - and the consequences of his identification are used to explain both his obsession with the Moses theme and his seeming digressions into Bible-analysis in "Moses and monotheism". The latter, which Freud described as a sequel to "Totem and Taboo", is seen as the acting out of the wish for parricide described in that work.
该论文提出的观点是，弗洛伊德并非如一些人所认为的那样，被“成为或不成为犹太人”的冲突所困扰，而是他已经决定“成为……”，并且并不渴望摒弃自己的犹太身份。这里所坚持的观点是，那些被引用来支持所谓对犹太身份矛盾态度的证据，从弗洛伊德对其父亲一生的矛盾态度、诋毁和摧毁他的冲动的角度来解释会更好。有证据表明，弗洛伊德认同摩西形象的是他的父亲，而非他自己——这种认同的后果被用来解释他对摩西主题的痴迷以及他在《摩西与一神教》中看似偏离主题进行圣经分析的原因。后者被弗洛伊德描述为《图腾与禁忌》的续篇，被视为在那部作品中所描述的弑父愿望的付诸行动。
