• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较食品荒漠居民和非食品荒漠居民的杂货店购物行为、饮食和 BMI:倾向评分分析的结果。

Comparing food desert residents with non-food desert residents on grocery shopping behaviours, diet and BMI: results from a propensity score analysis.

机构信息

Emory Prevention Research Center, Behavioral Sciences and Health Education Department, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA30032, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2020 Apr;23(5):806-811. doi: 10.1017/S136898001900363X. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1017/S136898001900363X
PMID:31957629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8924878/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether residence in a US Department of Agriculture-designated food desert is associated with perceived access to healthy foods, grocery shopping behaviours, diet and BMI among a national sample of primary food shoppers.

DESIGN

Data for the present study came from a self-administered cross-sectional survey administered in 2015. Residential addresses of respondents were geocoded to determine whether their census tract of residence was a designated food desert or not. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted regression was used to assess whether residence in a food desert was associated with dependent variables of interest.

SETTING

USA.

PARTICIPANTS

Of 4942 adult survey respondents, residential addresses of 75·0 % (n 3705) primary food shoppers were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Residence in a food desert (11·1 %, n 411) was not significantly associated with perceived access to healthy foods, most grocery shopping behaviours or dietary behaviour, but was significantly associated with primarily shopping at a superstore or supercentre v. a large grocery store (OR = 1·32; 95 % CI 1·02, 1·71; P = 0·03) and higher BMI (b = 1·14; 95 % CI 0·36, 1·93; P = 0·004).

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that food desert residents shop at different food stores and have higher BMI than non-food desert residents.

摘要

目的

在美国农业部指定的食品荒漠居住是否与健康食品的感知获取、杂货店购物行为、饮食和 BMI 有关,本研究旨在确定这一问题。

方法

本研究的数据来自于 2015 年进行的一项自我管理的横断面调查。受访者的居住地址进行了地理编码,以确定他们居住的普查区是否为指定的食品荒漠。使用逆概率治疗加权回归来评估居住在食品荒漠是否与感兴趣的因变量相关。

地点

美国。

参与者

在 4942 名成年调查受访者中,有 75.0%(n=3705)的主要食品购物者的居住地址被纳入分析。

结果

居住在食品荒漠(11.1%,n=411)与健康食品的感知获取、大多数杂货店购物行为或饮食行为没有显著关联,但与主要在超市或超级中心购物而不是在大型杂货店购物显著相关(OR=1.32;95%CI 1.02,1.71;P=0.03),并且 BMI 更高(b=1.14;95%CI 0.36,1.93;P=0.004)。

结论

结果表明,食品荒漠居民在不同的食品店购物,并且 BMI 高于非食品荒漠居民。

相似文献

1
Comparing food desert residents with non-food desert residents on grocery shopping behaviours, diet and BMI: results from a propensity score analysis.比较食品荒漠居民和非食品荒漠居民的杂货店购物行为、饮食和 BMI:倾向评分分析的结果。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Apr;23(5):806-811. doi: 10.1017/S136898001900363X. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
2
Food Shopping and Acquisition Behaviors in Relation to BMI among Residents of Low-Income Communities in South Carolina.南卡罗来纳州低收入社区居民与体重指数相关的食品购买及获取行为
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 16;14(9):1075. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091075.
3
Food Acquisition and Shopping Patterns among Residents of Low-Income and Low-Access Communities in South Carolina.南卡罗来纳州低收入、低服务社区居民的食物获取和购物模式。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Oct;118(10):1844-1854. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
4
Distance from the nearest grocery stores and frequency of store-specific shopping are associated with dietary intake frequency among the community-dwelling independent elderly population.距离最近的杂货店的距离和特定商店购物的频率与社区独立老年人的饮食摄入频率有关。
Nutr Health. 2020 Sep;26(3):197-207. doi: 10.1177/0260106020923806. Epub 2020 May 13.
5
A four-year observational study to examine the dietary impact of the North Carolina Healthy Food Small Retailer Program, 2017-2020.一项为期四年的观察性研究,旨在研究北卡罗来纳州健康食品小型零售商计划对饮食的影响,2017-2020 年。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Mar 24;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01109-8.
6
Healthy food access for urban food desert residents: examination of the food environment, food purchasing practices, diet and BMI.城市食品沙漠居民获取健康食品情况:食品环境、食品购买行为、饮食与体重指数调查
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Aug;18(12):2220-30. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002742. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
7
Disparities in Access to Healthy Diets: How Food Security and Food Shopping Behaviors Relate to Fruit and Vegetable Intake.获取健康饮食的机会存在差异:食品安全和食品购物行为如何影响水果和蔬菜摄入量。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Nov;120(11):1847-1858. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
8
The Association between Food Security and Store-Specific and Overall Food Shopping Behaviors.食品安全与特定商店和总体食品购物行为之间的关系。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Dec;117(12):1931-1940. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
9
Using a Grocery List Is Associated With a Healthier Diet and Lower BMI Among Very High-Risk Adults.在极高风险成年人中,使用购物清单与更健康的饮食和更低的体重指数相关。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015 May-Jun;47(3):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.01.005.
10
A food desert in Detroit: associations with food shopping and eating behaviours, dietary intakes and obesity.底特律的食品荒漠:与食品购物和饮食习惯、饮食摄入和肥胖的关联。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Dec;16(12):2114-23. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000967. Epub 2013 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer Incidence and Trends in Persistent Poverty Areas of California by Race/Ethnicity and Sex.加利福尼亚州长期贫困地区按种族/族裔和性别的癌症发病率及趋势
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(15):e71088. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71088.
2
The Risk of Pediatric Overweight and Children's Objectively Measured Sedentary Behaviors and Physical Activity by Area of Residence.按居住地区划分的儿童超重风险以及儿童经客观测量的久坐行为和身体活动情况。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 21;13(5):462. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13050462.
3
Examining disparities in PFAS plasma concentrations: Impact of drinking water contamination, food access, proximity to industrial facilities and superfund sites.研究全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)血浆浓度的差异:饮用水污染、食物获取、靠近工业设施和超级基金场地的影响。
Environ Res. 2025 Jan 1;264(Pt 1):120370. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.120370. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
4
The Impact of Living in a Low Food Access/Low Income Area on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.生活在食物获取不便/低收入地区对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的影响。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan;172(1):321-328. doi: 10.1002/ohn.969. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
5
Comparison of neighborhood deprivation index and food desert status as environmental predictors of early childhood obesity.邻里贫困指数与食物荒漠状况作为幼儿肥胖环境预测因素的比较
Int Public Health J. 2022;14(3):263-276.
6
A Cross-Sectional Study of Grocery Shopping Factors of Importance among Food-Insecure African Americans.一项针对粮食不安全的非裔美国人购物时重要因素的横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Apr 17;16(8):1188. doi: 10.3390/nu16081188.
7
Food desert residence has limited impact on veteran fecal microbiome composition: a U.S. Veteran Microbiome Project study.食物荒漠居住环境对退伍军人粪便微生物组构成的影响有限:美国退伍军人微生物组计划研究。
mSystems. 2023 Dec 21;8(6):e0071723. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00717-23. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
8
Exploring the associations between neighbourhood food environment, household food insecurity and child weight-related outcomes in socio-economically and racially/ethnically diverse families.探究社会经济和种族/民族多样化家庭中邻里食物环境、家庭食物不安全与儿童体重相关结果之间的关联。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Oct 10;25(12):1-10. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022002130.

本文引用的文献

1
Food Acquisition and Shopping Patterns among Residents of Low-Income and Low-Access Communities in South Carolina.南卡罗来纳州低收入、低服务社区居民的食物获取和购物模式。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Oct;118(10):1844-1854. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
2
Spatial access to food: Retiring the food desert metaphor.获取食物的空间便利性:摒弃“食物荒漠”这一隐喻。
Physiol Behav. 2018 Sep 1;193(Pt B):257-260. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.032. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
3
The Association between Food Security and Store-Specific and Overall Food Shopping Behaviors.食品安全与特定商店和总体食品购物行为之间的关系。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Dec;117(12):1931-1940. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
4
The relationship of the local food environment with obesity: A systematic review of methods, study quality, and results.当地食物环境与肥胖的关系:方法、研究质量及结果的系统评价
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Jul;23(7):1331-44. doi: 10.1002/oby.21118. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
5
Healthy food access for urban food desert residents: examination of the food environment, food purchasing practices, diet and BMI.城市食品沙漠居民获取健康食品情况:食品环境、食品购买行为、饮食与体重指数调查
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Aug;18(12):2220-30. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002742. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
6
Differences in food environment perceptions and spatial attributes of food shopping between residents of low and high food access areas.食物获取便利程度低的地区与高的地区的居民在食物环境认知及食品购物空间属性上的差异。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 Jul-Aug;46(4):241-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
7
Qualitative study of influences on food store choice.定性研究影响食品商店选择的因素。
Appetite. 2012 Oct;59(2):510-6. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.06.019. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
8
The local food environment and diet: a systematic review.本地食物环境与饮食:系统评价。
Health Place. 2012 Sep;18(5):1172-87. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 31.
9
An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.倾向得分法在观察性研究中减少混杂效应的介绍
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
10
Disparities and access to healthy food in the United States: A review of food deserts literature.美国的健康食品差异和获取问题:对食品荒漠文献的综述。
Health Place. 2010 Sep;16(5):876-84. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.013. Epub 2010 Apr 24.