Centre for Medical Parasitology at Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen and Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Infect Immun. 2020 Mar 23;88(4). doi: 10.1128/IAI.00778-19.
Development of a successful blood-stage vaccine against malaria remains a high priority. Immune-epidemiological studies are effective tools for the identification of antigenic targets of naturally acquired immunity (NAI) against malaria. However, differences in study design and methodology may compromise interstudy comparisons. Here, we assessed antibody responses against intact merozoites and a panel of 24 recombinant merozoite antigens in longitudinal cohort studies of Ghanaian ( = 115) and Indian ( = 121) populations using the same reagents and statistical methods. Anti-merozoite antibodies were associated with NAI in both the Indian (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.41, = 0.020) and the Ghanaian (HR = 0.17, < 0.001) participants. Of the 24 antigen-specific antibodies quantified, 12 and 8 were found to be protective in India and Ghana, respectively. Using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, a powerful variable subselection technique, we identified subsets of four (MSP6, MSP3.7, MSPDBL2, and Pf12) and five (cMSP3, MSP3.3, MSPDBL1, GLURP-R2, and RALP-1) antigens that explained NAI better than the individual antibodies in India (HR = 0.18, < 0.001) and Ghana (HR = 0.31, < 0.001), respectively. IgG1 and/or IgG3 subclasses against five antigens from these subsets were associated with protection. Through this comparative study, maintaining uniformity of reagents and methodology, we demonstrate that NAI across diverse geographic regions may result from antibodies to multiple antigenic targets that constitute the peripheral merozoite surface protein complexes.
开发一种成功的疟疾血期疫苗仍然是当务之急。免疫流行病学研究是确定对疟疾自然获得性免疫(NAI)的抗原靶标的有效工具。然而,研究设计和方法的差异可能会影响研究间的比较。在这里,我们使用相同的试剂和统计方法,评估了纵向队列研究中加纳( = 115)和印度( = 121)人群对完整裂殖子和 24 个重组裂殖子抗原的抗体反应。在印度(危险比[HR] = 0.41, = 0.020)和加纳(HR = 0.17, < 0.001)参与者中,抗裂殖子抗体与 NAI 相关。在量化的 24 种抗原特异性抗体中,在印度和加纳分别发现了 12 种和 8 种具有保护作用的抗体。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归,一种强大的变量选择技术,我们确定了四个(MSP6、MSP3.7、MSPDBL2 和 Pf12)和五个(cMSP3、MSP3.3、MSPDBL1、GLURP-R2 和 RALP-1)抗原的子集,这些子集比印度(HR = 0.18, < 0.001)和加纳(HR = 0.31, < 0.001)中的单个抗体更好地解释了 NAI。来自这些亚组的五种抗原的 IgG1 和/或 IgG3 亚类与保护相关。通过这项比较研究,我们在保持试剂和方法学一致性的基础上,证明了来自不同地理区域的 NAI 可能是由于针对构成外周裂殖子表面蛋白复合物的多个抗原靶标产生的抗体所致。