• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对人工关节置换术后感染翻修手术的偏好是什么?一项离散选择实验。

What are patients' preferences for revision surgery after periprosthetic joint infection? A discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 21;10(1):e031645. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031645.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031645
PMID:31969360
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7044986/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Understanding patients' preferences for treatment is crucial to provision of good care and shared decisions, especially when more than one treatment option exists for a given condition. One such condition is infection of the area around the prosthesis after hip replacement, which affects between 0.4% and 3% of patients. There is more than one treatment option for this major complication, and our study aimed to assess the value that patients place on aspects of revision surgery for periprosthetic hip infection.

DESIGN

We identified four attributes of revision surgery for periprosthetic hip infection. Using a discrete choice experiment (DCE), we measured the value placed on each attribute by 57 people who had undergone either one-stage or two-stage revision surgery for infection.

SETTING

The DCE was conducted with participants from nine National Health Service hospitals in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults who had undergone revision surgery for periprosthetic hip infection (N=57).

RESULTS

Overall, the strongest preference was for a surgical option that resulted in no restrictions on engaging in valued activities after a new hip is fitted (β=0.7). Less valued but still important attributes included a shorter time taken from the start of treatment to return to normal activities (6 months; β=0.3), few or no side effects from antibiotics (β=0.2), and having only one operation (β=0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The results highlight that people who have had revision surgery for periprosthetic hip infection most value aspects of care that affect their ability to engage in normal everyday activities. These were the most important characteristics in decisions about revision surgery.

摘要

目的

了解患者对治疗方案的偏好对于提供优质护理和共同决策至关重要,尤其是在针对某种疾病存在多种治疗选择的情况下。髋关节置换术后假体周围感染就是这样一种疾病,约有 0.4%至 3%的患者会出现这种情况。对于这种主要并发症,有多种治疗选择,我们的研究旨在评估患者对髋关节假体周围感染翻修手术各方面的重视程度。

设计

我们确定了髋关节假体周围感染翻修手术的四个属性。通过离散选择实验(DCE),我们测量了 57 名接受一期或二期翻修手术治疗感染的患者对每个属性的重视程度。

设置

DCE 在英国 9 家国民保健服务医院的参与者中进行。

参与者

接受髋关节假体周围感染翻修手术的成年人(N=57)。

结果

总体而言,患者对不会限制新髋关节安装后参与有价值活动的手术方案的偏好最强(β=0.7)。虽然不太重要但仍很重要的属性包括从治疗开始到恢复正常活动所需的时间更短(6 个月;β=0.3)、抗生素副作用少或无(β=0.2)以及只需进行一次手术(β=0.2)。

结论

结果表明,接受髋关节假体周围感染翻修手术的患者最看重影响其正常日常活动能力的护理方面。这些是翻修手术决策中最重要的特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af2/7044986/faccfa1ab656/bmjopen-2019-031645f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af2/7044986/faccfa1ab656/bmjopen-2019-031645f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af2/7044986/faccfa1ab656/bmjopen-2019-031645f01.jpg

相似文献

1
What are patients' preferences for revision surgery after periprosthetic joint infection? A discrete choice experiment.患者对人工关节置换术后感染翻修手术的偏好是什么?一项离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 21;10(1):e031645. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031645.
2
Which Factors Are Considered by Patients When Considering Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Discrete-choice Experiment.患者在考虑全关节置换术时会考虑哪些因素?一项离散选择实验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Mar 1;481(3):427-437. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002358. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
3
Effective single-stage revision using intra-articular antibiotic infusion after multiple failed surgery for periprosthetic joint infection : a mean seven years' follow-up.关节内抗生素灌注在多次翻修术后治疗人工关节周围感染的单阶段翻修中的疗效:平均 7 年随访。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Jul;104-B(7):867-874. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B7.BJJ-2021-1704.R1.
4
Managing uncertainty - a qualitative study of surgeons' decision-making for one-stage and two-stage revision surgery for prosthetic hip joint infection.应对不确定性——关于外科医生针对人工髋关节感染进行一期和二期翻修手术决策的定性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Apr 12;18(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1499-z.
5
Ten-Year Results Following One-Stage Septic Hip Exchange in the Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.一期感染性髋关节置换术治疗人工关节周围感染的十年结果
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1221-1226. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.021. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
6
Deep prosthetic joint infection: a qualitative study of the impact on patients and their experiences of revision surgery.深部人工关节感染:对患者影响及其翻修手术体验的质性研究
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 7;5(12):e009495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009495.
7
[The Role of a Modular Universal Tumour and Revision System (MUTARS®) in Lower Limb Endoprosthetic Revision Surgery - Outcome Analysis of 25 Patients].[模块化通用肿瘤与翻修系统(MUTARS®)在下肢假体翻修手术中的作用——25例患者的结果分析]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2017 Feb;155(1):61-66. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-114704. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
8
9
One-stage Revision With Catheter Infusion of Intraarticular Antibiotics Successfully Treats Infected THA.关节内抗生素导管灌注一期翻修术成功治疗感染性全髋关节置换术
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):419-429. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4977-y.
10
One-stage exchange arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic hip infection: results of a large prospective cohort study.一期髋关节置换术治疗慢性髋关节假体周围感染:一项大型前瞻性队列研究的结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jan 1;96(1):e1. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01451.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes following planned two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infections in the United States: a systematic review of the literature.美国人工关节周围感染计划性两阶段翻修关节成形术的疗效:文献系统评价
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jun 23;145(1):352. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05955-0.
2
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
3
Comparison of surgical treatments for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections using the desirability of outcome ranking in a prospective multicentre study.

本文引用的文献

1
Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention for periprosthetic joint infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes.清创、抗生素和假体保留治疗人工关节周围感染:系统评价和荟萃分析的治疗结果。
J Infect. 2018 Dec;77(6):479-488. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
2
Patients' preferences for treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer.食管癌新辅助放化疗后患者的治疗偏好。
Br J Surg. 2018 Nov;105(12):1630-1638. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10897. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
3
One- and two-stage surgical revision of peri-prosthetic joint infection of the hip: a pooled individual participant data analysis of 44 cohort studies.
在前瞻性多中心研究中,利用结局期望排名比较髋膝关节假体周围感染的手术治疗方法。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2025 Mar 24;10(2):73-84. doi: 10.5194/jbji-10-73-2025. eCollection 2025.
4
Dual-mobility implants in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.初次和翻修全髋关节置换术中双动式植入物:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jul 18;54:102495. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102495. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
The top ten benefits of one-stage septic exchange in the management of periprosthetic joint infections.一期感染性假体置换在人工关节感染治疗中的十大益处。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec;144(12):5089-5092. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05217-5. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
6
Development of evidence-based guidelines for the treatment and management of periprosthetic hip infection.人工髋关节周围感染治疗与管理的循证指南制定
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Apr 1;4(4):226-233. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.44.BJO-2022-0155.R1.
7
Survivorship of the dual-mobility construct in elective primary total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis including registry data.在择期初次全髋关节置换术中使用双动结构的存活率:系统评价和荟萃分析,包括注册数据。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Sep;143(9):5927-5934. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04803-3. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
8
How long do revised and multiply revised hip replacements last? A retrospective observational study of the National Joint Registry.翻修及多次翻修的髋关节置换术能维持多久?一项基于国家关节注册中心的回顾性观察研究。
Lancet Rheumatol. 2022 Jun 23;4(7):e468-e479. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(22)00097-2. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
Clinical and cost effectiveness of single stage compared with two stage revision for hip prosthetic joint infection (INFORM): pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial.一期与二期翻修治疗髋关节假体关节感染的临床和成本效果比较(INFORM):实用、平行组、开放标签、随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2022 Oct 31;379:e071281. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071281.
10
Managing periprosthetic joint infection-a qualitative analysis of nursing staffs' experiences.管理人工关节周围感染——对护理人员经验的质性分析
BMC Nurs. 2022 Jul 18;21(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00978-z.
髋关节假体周围关节感染一期和二期翻修手术:44 项队列研究的汇总个体参与者数据分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;33(10):933-946. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0377-9. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
4
Revision for prosthetic joint infection following hip arthroplasty: Evidence from the National Joint Registry.髋关节置换术后人工关节感染的翻修:来自国家关节注册中心的证据。
Bone Joint Res. 2017 Jun;6(6):391-398. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.66.BJR-2017-0003.R1.
5
Preferences for breast cancer risk reduction among BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: a discrete-choice experiment.BRCA1/BRCA2 突变携带者降低乳腺癌风险的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Sep;165(2):433-444. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4332-3. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
6
Managing uncertainty - a qualitative study of surgeons' decision-making for one-stage and two-stage revision surgery for prosthetic hip joint infection.应对不确定性——关于外科医生针对人工髋关节感染进行一期和二期翻修手术决策的定性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Apr 12;18(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1499-z.
7
An Empirical Comparison of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling to Estimate Stakeholders' Risk Tolerance for Hip Replacement Surgery.离散选择实验与最佳-最差标度法在估计利益相关者对髋关节置换手术风险承受能力方面的实证比较
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.020. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
8
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.离散选择实验分析的统计方法:药物经济学与结果研究国际协会联合分析良好研究实践特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 12.
9
One-stage or two-stage revision surgery for prosthetic hip joint infection--the INFORM trial: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.人工髋关节感染的一期或二期翻修手术——INFORM试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Feb 17;17:90. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1213-8.
10
Deep prosthetic joint infection: a qualitative study of the impact on patients and their experiences of revision surgery.深部人工关节感染:对患者影响及其翻修手术体验的质性研究
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 7;5(12):e009495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009495.