• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Challenges of Parameterizing Direct Effects in Individual-Level Simulation Models.参数化个体水平模拟模型中直接效应的挑战。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Jan;40(1):106-111. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19894940.
2
The introduction of computer-based case simulations into the United States medical licensing examination.将基于计算机的病例模拟引入美国医学执照考试。
Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10 Suppl):S94-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200210001-00029.
3
Quality assurance best practices for simulation-based examinations.基于模拟考试的质量保证最佳实践。
Simul Healthc. 2010 Aug;5(4):226-31. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181da5c93.
4
Forecasting without historical data: Bayesian probability models utilizing expert opinions.无历史数据的预测:利用专家意见的贝叶斯概率模型。
J Med Syst. 1995 Aug;19(4):359-74. doi: 10.1007/BF02257266.
5
Simulation in cardiology: state of the art.心脏病学中的模拟:当前技术水平
Eur Heart J. 2015 Apr 1;36(13):777-83. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu527. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
6
Development and Validation of PREDICT-DM: A New Microsimulation Model to Project and Evaluate Complications and Treatments of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.开发和验证 PREDICT-DM:一种新的微模拟模型,用于预测和评估 2 型糖尿病并发症和治疗方法。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Jun;21(6):344-355. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0393.
7
Floods: some probabilistic and statistical approaches.洪水:一些概率和统计方法。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Jul 15;360(1796):1389-408. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1006.
8
Ratio-based lengths of intervals to improve fuzzy time series forecasting.基于比率的区间长度以改进模糊时间序列预测。
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2006 Apr;36(2):328-40. doi: 10.1109/tsmcb.2005.857093.
9
Examining subgroup differences on the computer-based case-simulation component of USMLE step 3.研究美国医师执照考试第三步基于计算机的病例模拟部分的亚组差异。
Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10 Suppl):S83-5. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200210001-00027.
10
Simulation Basics: How to Conduct a High-Fidelity Simulation.模拟基础:如何进行高保真模拟
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2016 Feb;27(1):71-7. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2016569.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating social determinants of health into agent-based models of HIV transmission: methodological challenges and future directions.将健康的社会决定因素纳入基于主体的HIV传播模型:方法学挑战与未来方向。
Front Epidemiol. 2025 Feb 27;5:1533119. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2025.1533119. eCollection 2025.
2
Transportability Without Positivity: A Synthesis of Statistical and Simulation Modeling.可转移性无需正向性:统计与仿真模型的综合。
Epidemiology. 2024 Jan 1;35(1):23-31. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001677. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
3
Causal evidence in health decision making: methodological approaches of causal inference and health decision science.健康决策中的因果证据:因果推断方法和健康决策科学。
Ger Med Sci. 2022 Dec 21;20:Doc12. doi: 10.3205/000314. eCollection 2022.
4
Sensitivity Analysis of a Transmission Interruption Model for the Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections in Kenya.肯尼亚土壤传播性蠕虫感染传播中断模型的敏感性分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 25;10:841883. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.841883. eCollection 2022.
5
G-Computation and Agent-Based Modeling for Social Epidemiology: Can Population Interventions Prevent Posttraumatic Stress Disorder?基于 G 计算和基于代理的社会流行病学建模:人群干预能否预防创伤后应激障碍?
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 1;191(1):188-197. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab219.
6
Emulating Target Trials to Improve Causal Inference From Agent-Based Models.基于代理的模型从目标试验中进行因果推断的改进方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Aug 1;190(8):1652-1658. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab040.
7
A biologist's guide to model selection and causal inference.生物学家的模型选择与因果推断指南。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jan 27;288(1943):20202815. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2815.
8
Complex systems models for causal inference in social epidemiology.社会流行病学中用于因果推断的复杂系统模型。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Jul;75(7):702-708. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213052. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
DAG-informed regression modelling, agent-based modelling and microsimulation modelling: a critical comparison of methods for causal inference.DAG 启发式回归建模、基于代理的建模和微观模拟建模:因果推断方法的批判性比较。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb 1;48(1):243-253. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy260.
2
Using Observational Data to Calibrate Simulation Models.利用观测数据校准仿真模型。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Feb;38(2):212-224. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17738753. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
3
A Comparison of Agent-Based Models and the Parametric G-Formula for Causal Inference.基于主体的模型与用于因果推断的参数化G公式的比较
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jul 15;186(2):131-142. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx091.
4
Does water kill? A call for less casual causal inferences.水会致命吗?呼吁减少随意的因果推断。
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;26(10):674-680. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
5
On the causal interpretation of race in regressions adjusting for confounding and mediating variables.关于在对混杂变量和中介变量进行调整的回归分析中种族的因果解释
Epidemiology. 2014 Jul;25(4):473-84. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000105.
6
Individual-based simulation models of HIV transmission: reporting quality and recommendations.基于个体的 HIV 传播模拟模型:报告质量与建议。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 30;8(9):e75624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075624. eCollection 2013.
7
State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--3.状态转移建模:ISPOR-SMDM 建模良好实践工作组的报告——3。
Value Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(6):812-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.014.
8
Toward Causal Inference With Interference.迈向具有干扰性的因果推断
J Am Stat Assoc. 2008 Jun;103(482):832-842. doi: 10.1198/016214508000000292.
9
Study designs for dependent happenings.相依事件的研究设计。
Epidemiology. 1991 Sep;2(5):331-8. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199109000-00004.

参数化个体水平模拟模型中直接效应的挑战。

The Challenges of Parameterizing Direct Effects in Individual-Level Simulation Models.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2020 Jan;40(1):106-111. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19894940.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X19894940
PMID:31975656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6989037/
Abstract

Individual-level simulation models are used to assess the effects of health interventions in complex settings. However, estimating valid causal effects using these models requires correct parametrization of the relationships between time-varying treatments, outcomes, and other variables in the causal structure. To parameterize these relationships, individual-level simulation models typically need estimates of the direct effects of treatment. However, direct effects of treatment are often not well- defined and therefore cannot be validly estimated from any data. In this paper, we explain the causal meaning of the parameters of individual-level simulation models as direct effects, describe why direct effects may be difficult to define unambiguously in some settings, and conclude with some suggestions for the design of individual-level simulation models in those settings.

摘要

个体水平模拟模型被用于评估复杂环境下卫生干预措施的效果。然而,使用这些模型来估计有效的因果效应,需要正确参数化随时间变化的处理、结果和因果结构中其他变量之间的关系。为了参数化这些关系,个体水平模拟模型通常需要处理的直接效应的估计。然而,处理的直接效应通常没有很好的定义,因此不能从任何数据中有效地估计。在本文中,我们将解释个体水平模拟模型参数的因果意义作为直接效应,描述为什么在某些情况下直接效应可能难以明确界定,并对在这些情况下设计个体水平模拟模型提出一些建议。