Suppr超能文献

3T 下低水平脂肪分数定量:不同水脂重建和磁共振波谱工具的比较研究。

Low-level fat fraction quantification at 3 T: comparative study of different tools for water-fat reconstruction and MR spectroscopy.

机构信息

Institute of Scientific Instruments of the CAS, Kralovopolska 147, 612 64, Brno, Czech Republic.

Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, High-Field MR Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

MAGMA. 2020 Aug;33(4):455-468. doi: 10.1007/s10334-020-00825-9. Epub 2020 Jan 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Chemical Shift Encoded Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CSE-MRI)-based quantification of low-level (< 5% of proton density fat fraction-PDFF) fat infiltration requires highly accurate data reconstruction for the assessment of hepatic or pancreatic fat accumulation in diagnostics and biomedical research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compare three software tools available for water/fat image reconstruction and PDFF quantification with MRS as the reference method. Based on the algorithm exploited in the tested software, the accuracy of fat fraction quantification varies. We evaluate them in phantom and in vivo MRS and MRI measurements.

RESULTS

The signal model of Intralipid 20% emulsion used for phantoms was established for 3 T and 9.4 T fields. In all cases, we noticed a high coefficient of determination (R-squared) between MRS and MRI-PDFF measurements: in phantoms <0.9924-0.9990>; and in vivo <0.8069-0.9552>. Bland-Altman analysis was applied to phantom and in vivo measurements.

DISCUSSION

Multi-echo MRI in combination with an advanced algorithm including multi-peak spectrum modeling appears as a valuable and accurate method for low-level PDFF quantification over large FOV in high resolution, and is much faster than MRS methods. The graph-cut algorithm (GC) showed the fewest water/fat swaps in the PDFF maps, and hence stands out as the most robust method of those tested.

摘要

目的

基于化学位移编码磁共振成像(CSE-MRI)的低水平(<5%质子密度脂肪分数-PDFF)脂肪浸润定量需要高度准确的数据重建,以便在诊断和生物医学研究中评估肝或胰腺脂肪堆积。

材料和方法

我们比较了三种可用于水/脂肪图像重建和 PDFF 定量的软件工具,并将 MRS 作为参考方法。基于测试软件中使用的算法,脂肪分数定量的准确性会有所不同。我们在体模和体内 MRS 和 MRI 测量中对它们进行了评估。

结果

用于体模的 Intralipid 20%乳剂的信号模型是在 3T 和 9.4T 场中建立的。在所有情况下,我们都注意到 MRS 和 MRI-PDFF 测量之间的高决定系数(R 平方):在体模中为<0.9924-0.9990>;在体内为<0.8069-0.9552>。Bland-Altman 分析应用于体模和体内测量。

讨论

多回波 MRI 结合先进的算法,包括多峰谱建模,是一种在高分辨率、大视野中进行低水平 PDFF 定量的有价值且准确的方法,比 MRS 方法快得多。图割算法(GC)在 PDFF 图中显示的水/脂肪交换最少,因此是测试中最稳健的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验