Motosugi Utaroh, Hernando Diego, Wiens Curtis, Bannas Peter, Reeder Scott B
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin.
Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi.
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2017 Oct 10;16(4):332-339. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2016-0081. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
To determine whether high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) acquisitions improve the repeatability of liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measurements using confounder-corrected chemical shift-encoded magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (CSE-MRI).
Eleven fat-water phantoms were scanned with 8 different protocols with varying SNR. After repositioning the phantoms, the same scans were repeated to evaluate the test-retest repeatability. Next, an in vivo study was performed with 20 volunteers and 28 patients scheduled for liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Two CSE-MRI protocols with standard- and high-SNR were repeated to assess test-retest repeatability. MR spectroscopy (MRS)-based PDFF was acquired as a standard of reference. The standard deviation (SD) of the difference (Δ) of PDFF measured in the two repeated scans was defined to ascertain repeatability. The correlation between PDFF of CSE-MRI and MRS was calculated to assess accuracy. The SD of Δ and correlation coefficients of the two protocols (standard- and high-SNR) were compared using F-test and t-test, respectively. Two reconstruction algorithms (complex-based and magnitude-based) were used for both the phantom and in vivo experiments.
The phantom study demonstrated that higher SNR improved the repeatability for both complex- and magnitude-based reconstruction. Similarly, the in vivo study demonstrated that the repeatability of the high-SNR protocol (SD of Δ = 0.53 for complex- and = 0.85 for magnitude-based fit) was significantly higher than using the standard-SNR protocol (0.77 for complex, P < 0.001; and 0.94 for magnitude-based fit, P = 0.003). No significant difference was observed in the accuracy between standard- and high-SNR protocols.
Higher SNR improves the repeatability of fat quantification using confounder-corrected CSE-MRI.
使用校正混杂因素的化学位移编码磁共振成像(CSE-MRI),确定高信噪比(SNR)采集是否能提高肝脏质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)测量的可重复性。
使用8种不同的具有不同SNR的方案对11个脂肪-水模体进行扫描。在重新定位模体后,重复相同的扫描以评估重测可重复性。接下来,对20名志愿者和28名计划进行肝脏磁共振成像(MRI)的患者进行了一项体内研究。重复两种具有标准SNR和高SNR的CSE-MRI方案,以评估重测可重复性。采集基于磁共振波谱(MRS)的PDFF作为参考标准。定义两次重复扫描中测量的PDFF差值(Δ)的标准差(SD),以确定可重复性。计算CSE-MRI的PDFF与MRS之间的相关性,以评估准确性。分别使用F检验和t检验比较两种方案(标准SNR和高SNR)的Δ的SD和相关系数。在模体和体内实验中均使用了两种重建算法(基于复数和基于幅度)。
模体研究表明,较高的SNR提高了基于复数和基于幅度重建的可重复性。同样,体内研究表明,高SNR方案的可重复性(基于复数拟合的Δ的SD = 0.53,基于幅度拟合的为0.85)明显高于使用标准SNR方案(基于复数的为0.77,P < 0.001;基于幅度拟合的为0.94,P = 0.003)。在标准SNR和高SNR方案之间的准确性方面未观察到显著差异。
较高的SNR可提高使用校正混杂因素的CSE-MRI进行脂肪定量的可重复性。