Sociology Department, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA.
Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Aug;42 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):130-144. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13059. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
We consider uncertainty in relation to clinical trials for terminal non-small cell lung cancer, which is an aggressive and difficult to treat form of cancer. Using grounded theory to analyse 85 clinical interactions between doctors, patients and family members, we argue that uncertainty is a major source of tension for terminally ill patients, with individuals confronting a choice between transitioning to palliative care or volunteering for an experimental/trial medication that might postpone death. Regardless of their efficacy, patients must also consider how such experimental treatments might impact their quality-of-life. We argue that clinical trials produce uncertainty through (i) discussions about the efficacy of clinical trials; (ii) the physiological consequences of clinical trial medications; and (iii) the impact clinical trials have on patient's prognostic understanding of their terminal cancer. Accordingly, while study participants encounter high prognostic certainty (i.e. they have a fatal cancer), they nonetheless experience considerable uncertainty in relation to their participation in clinical trials.
我们考虑了与晚期非小细胞肺癌临床试验相关的不确定性,这是一种侵袭性和难以治疗的癌症。通过扎根理论分析 85 例医生、患者和家属之间的临床互动,我们认为不确定性是晚期患者的主要紧张源,个体面临着在过渡到姑息治疗或自愿接受可能推迟死亡的实验/试验药物之间做出选择。无论这些药物的疗效如何,患者还必须考虑此类实验性治疗对其生活质量的影响。我们认为临床试验通过以下方式产生不确定性:(i)讨论临床试验的疗效;(ii)临床试验药物的生理后果;(iii)临床试验对患者对其晚期癌症预后理解的影响。因此,尽管研究参与者遇到了高预后确定性(即他们患有致命癌症),但他们在参与临床试验方面仍然存在相当大的不确定性。