Suppr超能文献

超声引导前路与后路肩胛上神经阻滞对横膈膜麻痹的影响:一项双盲、随机对照试验。

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following ultrasound-guided anterior vs. posterior suprascapular nerve block: a double-blind, randomised control trial.

机构信息

Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse Purpan, Hôpital Riquet, Université Toulouse 3-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.

Département d'Orthopédie Traumatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse Purpan, Hôpital Riquet, Université Toulouse 3-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2020 Apr;75(4):499-508. doi: 10.1111/anae.14978. Epub 2020 Jan 26.

Abstract

Interscalene brachial plexus block provides analgesia for shoulder surgery but is associated with hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. Before considering a combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block as an alternative to interscalene brachial plexus block, evaluation of the incidence of diaphragmatic dysfunction according to the approach to the suprascapular nerve is necessary. We randomly allocated 84 patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery to an anterior or a posterior approach to the suprascapular nerve block combined with an axillary nerve block using 10 ml ropivacaine 0.375% for each nerve. The primary outcome was the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis diagnosed by ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included: characterisation of the hemidiaphragmatic paralysis over time; numeric rating scale pain scores; oral morphine equivalent consumption; and patient satisfaction. The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis was 40% (n = 17) vs. 2% (n = 1) in the anterior and posterior groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In one third of patients with hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, it persisted beyond the eighth hour. The median (interquartile range [range]) oral morphine equivalent consumption was significantly higher in the posterior approach when compared with the anterior approach, whether in the recovery area (20 [5-31 (0-60)] mg vs. 7.5 [0-14 (0-52)] mg, respectively; p = 0.004) or during the first 24 h (82 [61-127 (12-360) mg] vs. 58 [30-86 (0-160)] mg, respectively; p = 0.01). Patient satisfaction was comparable between groups (p = 0.6). Compared with the anterior approach, diaphragmatic function is best preserved with the posterior needle approach to the suprascapular nerve block.

摘要

经斜角肌间臂丛阻滞可为肩部手术提供镇痛,但会导致膈肌麻痹。在考虑将肩胛上神经和腋神经联合阻滞作为替代经斜角肌间臂丛阻滞的方法之前,有必要根据肩胛上神经入路评估膈肌功能障碍的发生率。我们将 84 例行关节镜肩部手术的患者随机分配至肩胛上神经阻滞的前路或后路入路,联合腋神经阻滞,每根神经使用 10ml 0.375%罗哌卡因。主要结局为超声诊断的膈肌麻痹发生率。次要结局包括:膈肌麻痹的时间特征;数字评分量表疼痛评分;口服吗啡等效消耗量;以及患者满意度。前路和后路组的膈肌麻痹发生率分别为 40%(n=17)和 2%(n=1)(p<0.001)。三分之一的膈肌麻痹患者其膈肌麻痹持续时间超过 8 小时。后路组在恢复区(20[5-31(0-60)]mg 比 7.5[0-14(0-52)]mg,p=0.004)和 24 小时内(82[61-127(12-360)]mg 比 58[30-86(0-160)]mg,p=0.01)的口服吗啡等效消耗量显著高于前路组。两组患者的满意度相当(p=0.6)。与前路相比,后路肩胛上神经阻滞对膈肌功能的保护最佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验