• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挑战“静态”现状:截止日期前团队流程参与轨迹。

Challenging the "static" quo: Trajectories of engagement in team processes toward a deadline.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary.

Bissett School of Business, Department of General Management and Human Resources, Mount Royal University.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2020 Oct;105(10):1145-1163. doi: 10.1037/apl0000479. Epub 2020 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000479
PMID:31985237
Abstract

Although team effectiveness research has advanced our understanding of team processes, much of this research has been based on static methodologies, despite the recognition that team processes change over time. Thus, the purpose of this article is to advance the team dynamics literature by developing and testing a theoretical account of team engagement in processes toward a deadline. We theorize about team process trajectories, which we suggest is the form of process change over time (i.e., pattern of increase/decrease). Further, we identify a key driver of process trajectories and consider the implications of trajectories for team performance. Results from a series of linear multilevel latent growth models suggested that teams' engagement in strategy and planning, monitoring goal progress, and cooperative conflict management (cf. Marks, Mathieu, & Zaccaro, 2001) increased over time toward a deadline, and that steeper increases tended to be positively related to team performance. Finally, achievement-striving was found to be an important within-team factor driving team-specific process trajectories and was indirectly related to performance. This study provides new theoretical insights with respect to how teams engage in processes toward a deadline, along with team achievement-striving as a compositional input, and the performance implications of team process trajectories. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

尽管团队有效性研究已经提高了我们对团队过程的理解,但其中许多研究都是基于静态方法学的,尽管人们已经认识到团队过程会随时间而变化。因此,本文的目的是通过开发和测试一个关于团队在截止日期前的进程中的参与度的理论解释来推进团队动态学的文献。我们对团队过程轨迹进行了理论探讨,我们认为这是随着时间的推移(即,增加/减少的模式)的过程变化的形式。此外,我们确定了过程轨迹的一个关键驱动因素,并考虑了轨迹对团队绩效的影响。一系列线性多层潜在增长模型的结果表明,团队在战略和计划制定、监测目标进展以及合作性冲突管理方面的参与度(参照 Marks、Mathieu 和 Zaccaro,2001)随着时间的推移逐渐向截止日期逼近,而更陡峭的增长趋势往往与团队绩效呈正相关。最后,成就追求被发现是一个重要的团队内因素,它推动了特定团队的过程轨迹,并间接地与绩效相关。本研究提供了新的理论见解,说明团队如何在截止日期前参与进程,以及团队的成就追求作为一种组合投入,以及团队过程轨迹对绩效的影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Challenging the "static" quo: Trajectories of engagement in team processes toward a deadline.挑战“静态”现状:截止日期前团队流程参与轨迹。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Oct;105(10):1145-1163. doi: 10.1037/apl0000479. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
2
A formal model of leadership goal striving: Development of core process mechanisms and extensions to action team context.领导目标追求的正式模型:核心过程机制的发展及其在行动团队情境中的扩展。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Mar;104(3):388-410. doi: 10.1037/apl0000370. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
3
To link or not to link? Multiple team membership and unit performance.关联还是不关联?多团队成员身份与单位绩效。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Mar;104(3):341-356. doi: 10.1037/apl0000381. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
4
A dynamic systems theory of intrateam conflict contagion.团队内部冲突传播的动态系统理论。
J Appl Psychol. 2024 Jun;109(6):871-896. doi: 10.1037/apl0001172. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
5
Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies.为成功的团队绩效轨迹奠定基础:团队章程和绩效策略的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):90-103. doi: 10.1037/a0013257.
6
Transactive memory systems in context: A meta-analytic examination of contextual factors in transactive memory systems development and team performance.情境中的交互记忆系统:交互记忆系统发展和团队绩效的情境因素的元分析检验。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Mar;104(3):464-493. doi: 10.1037/apl0000329. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
7
Mines in the End Zone: Are there Downsides to Team Performance?终场区的地雷:团队表现是否有不利之处?
Span J Psychol. 2020 Nov 20;23:e49. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2020.44.
8
The role of team goal monitoring in the curvilinear relationship between team efficacy and team performance.团队目标监控在团队效能与团队绩效之间的曲线关系中的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Sep;99(5):976-87. doi: 10.1037/a0036978. Epub 2014 May 26.
9
When passions collide: Passion convergence in entrepreneurial teams.当激情碰撞:创业团队中的激情融合
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Jun;106(6):902-920. doi: 10.1037/apl0000812. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
10
Team and individual influences on members' identification and performance per membership in multiple team membership arrangements.多团队隶属关系中成员的认同和绩效的团队和个体影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Mar;104(3):303-320. doi: 10.1037/apl0000344. Epub 2018 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Planning and performance in teams: A Bayesian meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach.团队中的计划与绩效:贝叶斯元分析结构方程建模方法。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 13;18(1):e0279933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279933. eCollection 2023.
2
Engagement in digital interventions.参与数字干预措施。
Am Psychol. 2022 Oct;77(7):836-852. doi: 10.1037/amp0000983. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
3
Human-Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature.人机协作:实证文献综述与分析。
Hum Factors. 2022 Aug;64(5):904-938. doi: 10.1177/0018720820960865. Epub 2020 Oct 22.