• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮层 fNIRS 反应可以用响度知觉来更好地解释,而不是声音强度。

Cortical fNIRS Responses Can Be Better Explained by Loudness Percept than Sound Intensity.

机构信息

Translational Hearing Research, The Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1187-1195. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000836.

DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000836
PMID:31985534
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a brain imaging technique particularly suitable for hearing studies. However, the nature of fNIRS responses to auditory stimuli presented at different stimulus intensities is not well understood. In this study, we investigated whether fNIRS response amplitude was better predicted by stimulus properties (intensity) or individually perceived attributes (loudness).

DESIGN

Twenty-two young adults were included in this experimental study. Four different stimulus intensities of a broadband noise were used as stimuli. First, loudness estimates for each stimulus intensity were measured for each participant. Then, the 4 stimulation intensities were presented in counterbalanced order while recording hemoglobin saturation changes from cortical auditory brain areas. The fNIRS response was analyzed in a general linear model design, using 3 different regressors: a non-modulated, an intensity-modulated, and a loudness-modulated regressor.

RESULTS

Higher intensity stimuli resulted in higher amplitude fNIRS responses. The relationship between stimulus intensity and fNIRS response amplitude was better explained using a regressor based on individually estimated loudness estimates compared with a regressor modulated by stimulus intensity alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Brain activation in response to different stimulus intensities is more reliant upon individual loudness sensation than physical stimulus properties. Therefore, in measurements using different auditory stimulus intensities or subjective hearing parameters, loudness estimates should be examined when interpreting results.

摘要

目的

功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)是一种特别适合听力研究的脑成像技术。然而,对于在不同刺激强度下呈现的听觉刺激,fNIRS 响应的性质尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们研究了 fNIRS 响应幅度是由刺激特性(强度)还是个体感知属性(响度)更好地预测。

设计

本实验研究纳入了 22 名年轻成年人。宽带噪声的四个不同刺激强度用作刺激。首先,为每个参与者测量每个刺激强度的响度估计。然后,以平衡的顺序呈现 4 种刺激强度,同时记录皮质听觉脑区的血红蛋白饱和度变化。使用 3 种不同的回归器(非调制回归器、强度调制回归器和响度调制回归器)在广义线性模型设计中分析 fNIRS 响应。

结果

更高强度的刺激导致更高幅度的 fNIRS 响应。与仅由刺激强度调制的回归器相比,基于个体估计的响度估计的回归器更好地解释了刺激强度与 fNIRS 响应幅度之间的关系。

结论

对不同刺激强度的大脑激活更依赖于个体的响度感觉,而不是物理刺激特性。因此,在使用不同听觉刺激强度或主观听力参数进行测量时,在解释结果时应检查响度估计。

相似文献

1
Cortical fNIRS Responses Can Be Better Explained by Loudness Percept than Sound Intensity.皮层 fNIRS 反应可以用响度知觉来更好地解释,而不是声音强度。
Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1187-1195. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000836.
2
Sound Level Changes the Auditory Cortical Activation Detected with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.声级变化通过功能近红外光谱检测到的听觉皮层激活。
Brain Topogr. 2023 Sep;36(5):686-697. doi: 10.1007/s10548-023-00981-w. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
3
Cortical Processing Related to Intensity of a Modulated Noise Stimulus-a Functional Near-Infrared Study.与调制噪声刺激强度相关的皮层处理——一项功能近红外研究
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018 Jun;19(3):273-286. doi: 10.1007/s10162-018-0661-0. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
4
Assessing hearing by measuring heartbeat: The effect of sound level.通过测量心跳评估听力:声级的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 28;14(2):e0212940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212940. eCollection 2019.
5
The representation of level and loudness in the central auditory system for unilateral stimulation.单侧刺激时中枢听觉系统中响度和强度的表现。
Neuroimage. 2016 Oct 1;139:176-188. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.025. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
6
fMRI activation in relation to sound intensity and loudness.与声音强度和响度相关的功能磁共振成像激活
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 1;35(2):709-18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.013. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
7
Auditory fMRI of Sound Intensity and Loudness for Unilateral Stimulation.单侧刺激下声音强度和响度的听觉功能磁共振成像
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;894:165-174. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_18.
8
Cortical cross-modal plasticity following deafness measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.使用功能近红外光谱法测量耳聋后的皮质跨模态可塑性。
Hear Res. 2015 Jul;325:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
9
Relationship between loudness growth function and auditory steady-state response in normal-hearing subjects.听力正常受试者的响度增长函数与听觉稳态反应之间的关系。
Hear Res. 2008 Jan;235(1-2):105-13. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.10.007. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
10
Human auditory neuroimaging of intensity and loudness.人类听觉神经影像学中的强度和响度研究。
Hear Res. 2014 Jan;307:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Linking brain activation to clinical outcomes: an fNIRS study in cochlear implant users and normal hearing individuals.将大脑激活与临床结果联系起来:一项针对人工耳蜗使用者和听力正常个体的功能近红外光谱研究。
Neurophotonics. 2026 Jan;13(Suppl 1):S13004. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.13.S1.S13004. Epub 2025 Sep 11.
2
An fNIRS dataset for Multimodal Speech Comprehension in Normal Hearing Individuals and Cochlear Implant Users.一个用于正常听力个体和人工耳蜗使用者多模态语音理解的功能性近红外光谱数据集。
Sci Data. 2025 Jul 26;12(1):1305. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05654-w.
3
Sound intensity-dependent cortical activation: implications of the electrical and vascular activity on auditory intensity.
声音强度依赖性皮质激活:电活动和血管活动对听觉强度的影响。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2025 Dec;19(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s11571-025-10281-7. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
4
Three-dimensional infrared scanning: an enhanced approach for spatial registration of probes for neuroimaging.三维红外扫描:一种用于神经成像探头空间配准的增强方法。
Neurophotonics. 2024 Apr;11(2):024309. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.11.2.024309. Epub 2024 May 26.
5
Neurovascular coupling during auditory stimulation: event-related potentials and fNIRS hemodynamic.听觉刺激时的神经血管耦合:事件相关电位和 fNIRS 血液动力学。
Brain Struct Funct. 2023 Nov;228(8):1943-1961. doi: 10.1007/s00429-023-02698-9. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
6
Facilitating or disturbing? An investigation about the effects of auditory frequencies on prefrontal cortex activation and postural sway.促进还是干扰?关于听觉频率对前额叶皮层激活和姿势摆动影响的一项调查。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jun 22;17:1197733. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1197733. eCollection 2023.
7
Sound Level Changes the Auditory Cortical Activation Detected with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.声级变化通过功能近红外光谱检测到的听觉皮层激活。
Brain Topogr. 2023 Sep;36(5):686-697. doi: 10.1007/s10548-023-00981-w. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
8
Cortical responses correlate with speech performance in pre-lingually deaf cochlear implant children.皮质反应与语前聋人工耳蜗植入儿童的言语表现相关。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jun 2;17:1126813. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1126813. eCollection 2023.
9
Head hemodynamics and systemic responses during auditory stimulation.头部血液动力学和听觉刺激时的全身反应。
Physiol Rep. 2022 Jul;10(13):e15372. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15372.
10
Neural Activity During Audiovisual Speech Processing: Protocol For a Functional Neuroimaging Study.视听言语处理过程中的神经活动:一项功能性神经成像研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jun 21;11(6):e38407. doi: 10.2196/38407.