Suppr超能文献

微针瘢痕治疗:一项具有长期随访的大型前瞻性研究。

Microneedling of Scars: A Large Prospective Study with Long-Term Follow-Up.

机构信息

Washington, D.C.; and Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

From the Washington Institute of Dermatologic Laser Surgery.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Feb;145(2):358-364. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006462.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, microneedling has been increasingly used to treat a number of dermatologic conditions, including scars. Although initial studies demonstrated improvement of (mostly) atrophic scars with microneedling, the number of patients evaluated was relatively small, and the devices and treatment protocols used and posttreatment follow-up varied widely. Through this prospective observational study, the results of microneedling on 120 patients with a variety of scars are described.

METHODS

One hundred twenty consecutive patients (skin phototypes I through VI) with facial and nonfacial scars from a variety of etiologic sources (acne, trauma, surgery) were treated using a mechanical microneedling device. No additional treatments (topical or intralesional) were applied. Two assessors blinded to treatment protocol rated clinical improvement of scars 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment on a five-point scale. Side effects were monitored and tabulated.

RESULTS

Patients received one to six consecutive monthly microneedling treatments. All scars improved at least 50 percent after an average of 2.5 treatments. Over 80 percent of patients had 50 to 75 percent improvement, and 65 percent of patients demonstrated over 75 percent improvement. No significant clinical differences were observed in treatment responses of facial scars versus nonfacial scars nor between responses of atrophic acne scars and traumatic or surgical scars.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the use of microneedling for various facial and nonfacial scars across a broad range of skin phototypes with minimal risk of adverse effects. Further studies will help to establish standardized protocols to optimize treatment outcomes for different scar types.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

摘要

背景

近年来,微针已被越来越多地用于治疗多种皮肤科疾病,包括疤痕。尽管最初的研究表明微针治疗(主要是)萎缩性疤痕有效,但评估的患者数量相对较少,使用的设备和治疗方案以及治疗后随访差异很大。通过这项前瞻性观察研究,描述了微针治疗 120 例各种疤痕患者的结果。

方法

120 例连续患者(皮肤光型 I 至 VI),面部和非面部疤痕来自多种病因(痤疮、创伤、手术),使用机械微针治疗设备进行治疗。未应用其他治疗(局部或病灶内)。两名评估员对治疗方案不知情,在治疗后 1、3、6 和 12 个月,根据五分制评估疤痕的临床改善情况。监测并记录副作用。

结果

患者接受了 1 至 6 次连续的每月微针治疗。所有疤痕在平均 2.5 次治疗后至少改善了 50%。超过 80%的患者改善了 50-75%,65%的患者改善了 75%以上。面部疤痕与非面部疤痕之间,萎缩性痤疮疤痕与创伤性或手术性疤痕之间的治疗反应无明显临床差异。

结论

这项研究支持微针治疗各种面部和非面部疤痕,适用于广泛的皮肤光型,不良反应风险极小。进一步的研究将有助于建立标准化方案,优化不同类型疤痕的治疗效果。

临床问题/证据水平:治疗,IV。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验