Strazzi-Sahyon Henrico Badaoui, de Oliveira Murilo Silva, da Silva Paloma Pereira, Banci Henrique Augusto, de Melo Fernanda Santos, Martinez Carolina Martins Teixeira, Cintra Luciano Tavares Angelo, Gomes-Filho João Eduardo, Dezan-Júnior Eloi, Dos Santos Paulo Henrique, Sivieri-Araujo Gustavo
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Discipline of Endodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020 Jun;30:101673. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101673. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
BACKGROUND: There are few studies on the influence of methylene blue as a photosensitiser on the mechanical properties and adhesion of glass-fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Thus, this in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of photodynamic therapy with a methylene blue photosensitizer on the Martens hardness, elastic modulus, and bond strength of glass-fiber posts in different thirds of intraradicular dentin. METHODS: Eighty bovine teeth were divided into the following five groups: a control using deionized water, and four other groups according to the methylene blue concentration (50 mg/L or 100 mg/L) and substrate treatment (with or without red laser action). Ultramicrohardness test was used to evaluate the mechanical properties in different regions of the root dentin (n = 8). Push-out analysis was evaluated using a universal testing machine (n = 8). Data were subjected to the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn's test for comparing groups, and the Friedman test for comparing thirds (α = 0.05). Representative scanning electron microscopy images were obtained. RESULTS: In general, methylene blue in distinct concentrations, with or without laser action, did not cause differences in the mechanical properties or bond strength in different regions of root dentin (P > 0.05). Methylene blue at a higher concentration, activated with laser, produced lower bond strength values in the middle third of the root canal (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Methylene blue at 50 mg/L had no influence on the mechanical properties of the bovine tooth and the bond strength of the glass-fiber posts to intraradicular dentin.
背景:关于亚甲蓝作为光敏剂对玻璃纤维桩与根管内牙本质的力学性能及粘结性的影响的研究较少。因此,本体外研究旨在评估使用亚甲蓝光敏剂的光动力疗法对根管内牙本质不同三分之一区域的玻璃纤维桩的马氏硬度、弹性模量和粘结强度的影响。 方法:80颗牛牙分为以下五组:一组使用去离子水作为对照,其他四组根据亚甲蓝浓度(50mg/L或100mg/L)和底物处理(有无红色激光作用)划分。采用超微硬度测试评估牙根牙本质不同区域的力学性能(n = 8)。使用万能试验机评估推出分析(n = 8)。数据进行Kruskal-Wallis检验,随后进行Dunn检验以比较组间差异,以及Friedman检验以比较三分之一区域间的差异(α = 0.05)。获得代表性的扫描电子显微镜图像。 结果:总体而言,不同浓度的亚甲蓝,无论有无激光作用,在牙根牙本质不同区域的力学性能或粘结强度方面均未引起差异(P > 0.05)。较高浓度的亚甲蓝经激光激活后,在根管中部三分之一区域产生较低的粘结强度值(P < 0.05)。 结论:50mg/L的亚甲蓝对牛牙的力学性能以及玻璃纤维桩与根管内牙本质的粘结强度没有影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015-7-1
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2024-6-27