两次光动力疗法和不同光敏剂对不同根管内牙本质区域玻璃纤维桩粘结强度的影响。
Influence of two photodynamic therapy sessions and different photosensitizers on the bond strength of glass-fiber posts in different regions of intraradicular dentin.
机构信息
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, Discipline of Endodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
出版信息
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021 Mar;33:102193. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102193. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
BACKGROUND
Although photodynamic therapy associated with photosensitizers can promote microbial reduction, studies evaluating the consequences of two photodynamic therapy sessions associated with different photosensitizers on the bond strength of glass-fiber posts to endodontically treated intraradicular dentin are scarce. This in vitro study aimed to investigate the influence of two photodynamic therapy sessions using methylene blue or curcumin photosensitizers on the bond strength of glass-fiber posts to intraradicular dentin in different root thirds.
METHODS
Seventy-two teeth were divided into 9 experimental groups according to photosensitizer type, concentration and light-activation: Control - deionized water; Methylene blue 50 mg/L; Methylene blue 50 mg/L + laser; Methylene blue 100 mg/L; Methylene blue 100 mg/L + laser; Curcumin 500 mg/L; Curcumin 500 mg/L + LED; Curcumin 1000 mg/L; and Curcumin 1000 mg/L + LED. Push-out bond strength of the fiber posts to endodontically treated dentin was evaluated using a universal test machine (n = 8). Bond strength data underwent Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn test for comparison between treatments, and Friedman test for comparison between thirds (α = 0.05). Illustrative scanning electron microscopy images were obtained to qualify the failure mode.
RESULTS
Curcumin at higher concentration, activated or not by blue LED, decreased the bond strength values in the apical region when compared with the control group (P < 0.05). There was no difference between two photodynamic therapy sessions using methylene blue photosensitizer (activated or not) and the control group regardless of concentrations and root canal depth evaluated (P > 0.05). Regarding intraradicular depth, the different thirds showed no statistical difference on bond strength values (P > 0.05). All experimental groups presented predominance of mixed-type failure, excepting the methylene blue group at higher concentration activated by red laser, and the curcumin photosensitizer at both concentrations activated by blue LED.
CONCLUSIONS
Methylene blue at a 50 mg/L concentration can be applied in two PDT sessions, after biomechanical preparation and before glass-fiber post luting, as it presents no influence on root dentin bond strength in in vitro conditions.
背景
尽管光动力疗法联合光敏剂可促进微生物减少,但评估两次光动力疗法联合不同光敏剂对根管内牙本质的玻璃纤维桩粘结强度影响的研究较少。本体外研究旨在探讨两次使用亚甲蓝或姜黄素光敏剂的光动力疗法对不同根管内三分之一区域玻璃纤维桩粘结强度的影响。
方法
根据光敏剂类型、浓度和光激活,将 72 颗牙齿分为 9 个实验组:对照组-去离子水;亚甲蓝 50mg/L;亚甲蓝 50mg/L+激光;亚甲蓝 100mg/L;亚甲蓝 100mg/L+激光;姜黄素 500mg/L;姜黄素 500mg/L+LED;姜黄素 1000mg/L;姜黄素 1000mg/L+LED。使用万能试验机评估纤维桩与根管内牙本质的推出粘结强度(n=8)。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验对粘结强度数据进行分析,然后使用 Dunn 检验进行组间比较,使用 Friedman 检验进行根管内三分之一区域间比较(α=0.05)。获得说明性扫描电子显微镜图像以定性失效模式。
结果
与对照组相比,较高浓度的姜黄素(无论是否用蓝光 LED 激活)均降低了根尖区域的粘结强度值(P<0.05)。使用亚甲蓝光敏剂(无论是否激活)进行两次光动力疗法与对照组之间,以及评估的浓度和根管深度均无差异(P>0.05)。关于根管内深度,不同的三分之一区域的粘结强度值无统计学差异(P>0.05)。除了较高浓度的亚甲蓝经红光激光激活组和两种浓度的姜黄素经蓝光 LED 激活组外,所有实验组均表现为混合性失效占主导。
结论
在体外条件下,亚甲蓝浓度为 50mg/L 时可以进行两次 PDT 治疗,一次在生物力学预备后,一次在玻璃纤维桩粘固前,对根牙本质粘结强度无影响。