Facultad de Medicina Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Escuela de Microbiología, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Escuela de Microbiología, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jan 28;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1934-y.
The objective of the present study was to describe the knowledge regarding the antibiotic therapy of students of three medical schools in Medellín, Colombia.
The study population comprised medical students who were enrolled in three universities. The instrument contained questions regarding their current academic term, the university, the perceived quality of the education received on antibiotic therapy and bacterial resistance, and specific questions on upper respiratory tract infections, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and skin and soft tissue infections. The information was analyzed by calculating frequencies and measures of dispersion and central tendency. Knowledge regarding the treatment for each type of infection was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis H test.
We included 536 medical students, of which 43.5% students consider that the university has not sufficiently trained them to interpret antibiograms and 29.6% students consider that the quality of information received on the subject at their university ranges from regular to poor. The mean score for knowledge regarding antibiotic therapy for upper respiratory tract infections was 44.2 (9.9) on a scale from 0 to 100. The median score with regard to the treatment of pneumonia was 52.9 (14.7), that of urinary tract infection was 58.7 (14.8), and that of skin and soft tissue infections was 63.1 (19.4). The knowledge regarding antibiotic therapy for upper respiratory tract infections, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection does not improve with the academic term, the university, or perceived quality of the education received.
A large proportion of medical students perceive that the training received from the university is insufficient with regard to antibiotic use and bacterial resistance, which is consistent with the limited knowledge reflected in the selection of antibiotic treatment for respiratory, urinary tract, and skin and soft tissue infections. Overall, the situation was identical among all universities, and it did not significantly increase with the completion of an academic term.
本研究的目的在于描述哥伦比亚麦德林三所医学院学生对抗生素治疗的了解情况。
研究人群包括入读三所大学的医学生。该工具包含了关于他们当前学期、大学、对接受的抗生素治疗和细菌耐药性教育质量的看法,以及上呼吸道感染、肺炎、尿路感染和皮肤软组织感染的具体问题。信息通过计算频率和离散度和集中趋势的度量进行分析。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis H 检验比较每种感染类型的治疗知识。
我们纳入了 536 名医学生,其中 43.5%的学生认为大学没有充分培训他们解读抗生素药敏试验结果,29.6%的学生认为他们在大学接受的关于该主题的信息质量从一般到差不等。上呼吸道感染抗生素治疗知识的平均得分为 44.2(9.9),满分 100 分。肺炎治疗的中位数评分为 52.9(14.7),尿路感染为 58.7(14.8),皮肤软组织感染为 63.1(19.4)。上呼吸道感染、肺炎和尿路感染的抗生素治疗知识并不会随着学期、大学或所接受教育质量的提高而提高。
很大一部分医学生认为大学对抗生素使用和细菌耐药性的培训不足,这与他们在选择呼吸道、尿路感染和皮肤软组织感染的抗生素治疗方面知识有限的情况一致。总体而言,所有大学的情况都相同,并且随着学期的完成并没有显著增加。