• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格问卷 - 简式在高创伤暴露率的社区样本中的心理测量特性。

Psychometric Properties of the Personality Inventory for -Brief Form in a Community Sample with High Rates of Trauma Exposure.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Georgia.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):204-213. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1713138. Epub 2020 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2020.1713138
PMID:31995393
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9429596/
Abstract

In the current study, we used a sample of predominantly African-American women with high rates of trauma exposure (N = 434) to examine psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF). We compared model fit between a model with five correlated latent factors and a higher-order model in which the five latent factors were used to estimate a single "general pathology" factor. Additionally, we computed estimates of internal consistency and domain interrelations and examined indices of convergent/discriminant validity of the PID-5-BF domains by examining their relations to relevant criterion variables. The expected five-factor structure demonstrated good fit indices in a confirmatory factor analysis, and the more parsimonious, higher-order model was retained. Within this higher-order model, the first-order factors accounted for more variance in the criterion variables than the general pathology factor in most instances. The PID-5-BF domains were highly interrelated (s = .38 to .66), and convergent/discriminant validity of the domains varied: and generally showed the hypothesized pattern of relations with external criteria, while and displayed less consistent and discriminant relations. Results are discussed in terms of the costs and benefits of using brief pathological trait measures in samples characterized by high levels of psychopathology.

摘要

在当前的研究中,我们使用了一个主要由具有高创伤暴露率的非裔美国女性组成的样本(N=434),来检验 DSM-5-简短形式人格量表(PID-5-BF)的心理计量学特性。我们比较了一个具有五个相关潜在因素的模型和一个高阶模型的拟合度,在高阶模型中,这五个潜在因素被用来估计一个单一的“一般病理”因素。此外,我们计算了 PID-5-BF 各领域的内部一致性和领域间相关性的估计值,并通过考察它们与相关效标变量的关系,检验了 PID-5-BF 各领域的聚合/区别效度指标。预期的五因素结构在验证性因素分析中表现出良好的拟合指数,保留了更简约的高阶模型。在这个高阶模型中,一阶因素在大多数情况下比一般病理因素更能解释效标变量的方差。PID-5-BF 各领域之间高度相关(s=.38 至.66),领域的聚合/区别效度各不相同: 和 通常表现出与外部标准预期的关系模式,而 和 则表现出较少一致和区别的关系。结果从使用具有高精神病理学水平样本的简短病理性特质测量的成本和效益方面进行了讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0abb/9429596/bef529a0e942/nihms-1811149-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0abb/9429596/bef529a0e942/nihms-1811149-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0abb/9429596/bef529a0e942/nihms-1811149-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Personality Inventory for -Brief Form in a Community Sample with High Rates of Trauma Exposure.人格问卷 - 简式在高创伤暴露率的社区样本中的心理测量特性。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):204-213. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1713138. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
2
[Validation of a French translation of Krueger's personality inventory for DSM-5 in its brief form (PID-5 BF)].[克鲁格五因素人格问卷简版(PID-5 BF)法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2018 Feb;44(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
3
[The alternative model of personality disorders among the French population: Assessment with brief tools].[法国人群中人格障碍的替代模型:使用简短工具进行评估]
Encephale. 2023 Oct;49(5):496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2022.03.012. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
4
Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the Measurement of Maladaptive Personality and Psychopathology.DSM-5 简明人格量表(PID-5-BF)在测量适应不良人格和精神病理学中的效用。
Assessment. 2018 Jul;25(5):596-607. doi: 10.1177/1073191116676889. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
5
Translation and cultural adaptation of the DSM-5 Personality Inventory - Brief Form (PID-5-BF).DSM-5 人格障碍简明量表(PID-5-BF)的翻译与文化调适。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2020 Oct-Dec;42(4):291-301. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2019-0073.
6
The Personality Inventory for -Brief Form: An Examination of Internal Consistency, Factor Structure, and Relationship to Aggression in an Incarcerated Offender Sample.《- 简式人格量表》:对被监禁罪犯样本的内部一致性、因子结构和与攻击性的关系的检验。
Assessment. 2021 Jun;28(4):1136-1146. doi: 10.1177/1073191120916790. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
7
Personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form(PID-5-BF) in Chinese students and patients: evaluating the five-factor model and a culturally informed six-factor model.中文学生和患者的 DSM-5 简短形式人格量表(PID-5-BF):评估五因素模型和具有文化意义的六因素模型。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03080-x.
8
Examining the relations among the DSM-5 alternative model of personality, the five-factor model, and externalizing and internalizing behavior.探讨 DSM-5 人格替代模型、五因素模型以及外显和内隐行为之间的关系。
Personal Disord. 2018 Jul;9(4):379-384. doi: 10.1037/per0000240. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
9
A Family Study of the Section III Personality Pathology Model Using the Personality Inventory for the (PID-5).采用《人格障碍检查表第五版》(PID-5)对 第三节人格病理学模型进行的家系研究。
J Pers Disord. 2018 Dec;32(6):753-765. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_323. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
10
The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form: Evidence for Reliability and Construct Validity in a Sample of Community-Dwelling Italian Adolescents.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版简版人格量表:意大利社区青少年样本中的信度和结构效度证据
Assessment. 2017 Jul;24(5):615-631. doi: 10.1177/1073191115621793. Epub 2015 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Intensive 7-day internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for social anxiety disorder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.针对社交焦虑障碍的为期7天的强化互联网认知行为疗法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2025 Apr 18;26(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08826-6.
2
Personality functioning in bipolar 1 disorder and borderline personality disorder.双相 1 障碍和边缘型人格障碍的人格功能。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 25;24(1):846. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06297-8.
3
Do Italian people still wear masks? Analysis of personality and dispositional correlates of facemask use in post Covid-19 scenario.

本文引用的文献

1
Personality traits share overlapping neuroanatomical correlates with internalizing and externalizing psychopathology.人格特质与内化和外化精神病理学具有重叠的神经解剖学相关性。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Jan;128(1):1-11. doi: 10.1037/abn0000391. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
2
The General Factor of Psychopathology and Personality.精神病理学与人格的一般因素。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2017 Jan;5(1):182-183. doi: 10.1177/2167702616657042. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
3
A meta-analysis of the five-factor internal structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.
意大利人还戴口罩吗?新冠疫情后分析人格和性格特征与口罩使用的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 2;13(1):16538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43588-8.
4
How Has COVID-19 Affected Mental Health and Lifestyle Behaviors after 2 Years? The Third Step of a Longitudinal Study of Italian Citizens.新冠疫情对意大利民众心理健康和生活方式行为的影响持续了 2 年,这是一项纵向研究的第三步。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 31;20(1):759. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010759.
5
Survey of Stress in COVID Patient Post Treatment: A Qualitative Research.新冠患者治疗后压力调查:一项定性研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1646-S1649. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_376_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
6
The association of detachment with affective disorder symptoms during the COVID-19 lockdown: The role of living situation and social support.在 COVID-19 封锁期间,分离与情感障碍症状的关联:居住状况和社会支持的作用。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Sep 1;292:464-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.125. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
7
Investigating how individual differences influence responses to the COVID-19 crisis: The role of maladaptive and five-factor personality traits.探究个体差异如何影响对新冠疫情危机的反应:适应不良和五因素人格特质的作用。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jul;176:110786. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110786. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
8
Personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form(PID-5-BF) in Chinese students and patients: evaluating the five-factor model and a culturally informed six-factor model.中文学生和患者的 DSM-5 简短形式人格量表(PID-5-BF):评估五因素模型和具有文化意义的六因素模型。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03080-x.
9
DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders trait domains and PTSD symptoms in a sample of highly traumatized African American women and a prospective sample of trauma center patients.DSM-5 人格障碍特质领域替代模型在高度创伤的非裔美国女性样本和创伤中心患者前瞻性样本中的 PTSD 症状。
Personal Disord. 2021 Nov;12(6):491-502. doi: 10.1037/per0000477. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
10
A 2-Month Follow-Up Study of Psychological Distress among Italian People during the COVID-19 Lockdown.2 个月随访研究:COVID-19 封锁期间意大利民众的心理困扰
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 5;17(21):8180. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218180.
DSM-5 人格量表五因素内部结构的元分析。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Sep;30(9):1255-1260. doi: 10.1037/pas0000605. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
4
Measurement invariance of the DSM-5 Section III pathological personality trait model across sex.DSM-5 第三部分病理性人格特质模型在性别上的测量不变性。
Personal Disord. 2019 Mar;10(2):114-122. doi: 10.1037/per0000291. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Perils of partialing redux: The case of the Dark Triad.偏狭之害再探:黑暗三性格特质之例
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Oct;126(7):939-950. doi: 10.1037/abn0000278.
6
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies.精神病理学的分层分类法(HiTOP):传统分类法的维度替代方案。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 May;126(4):454-477. doi: 10.1037/abn0000258. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
7
Strong Homotypic Continuity in Common Psychopathology-, Internalizing-, and Externalizing-Specific Factors Over Time in Adolescents.青少年常见精神病理学、内化和外化特定因素随时间的强同型连续性。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2017 Jan;5(1):98-110. doi: 10.1177/2167702616651076. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
8
Examining the relations among the DSM-5 alternative model of personality, the five-factor model, and externalizing and internalizing behavior.探讨 DSM-5 人格替代模型、五因素模型以及外显和内隐行为之间的关系。
Personal Disord. 2018 Jul;9(4):379-384. doi: 10.1037/per0000240. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
9
Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the Measurement of Maladaptive Personality and Psychopathology.DSM-5 简明人格量表(PID-5-BF)在测量适应不良人格和精神病理学中的效用。
Assessment. 2018 Jul;25(5):596-607. doi: 10.1177/1073191116676889. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
10
Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives.G 因子模型中的异常结果:解释与替代方案。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):541-562. doi: 10.1037/met0000083. Epub 2016 Aug 15.