Pichon Maxime, Pichard Benoit, Barrioz Thierry, Plouzeau Chloé, Croquet Vincent, Fotsing Ginette, Chéron Alexandre, Vuillemin Éric, Wangermez Marc, Haineaux Paul-Arthur, Vasseur Philippe, Thiebault Quentin, Lefèvre Clémence, de Singly Anaïs, Cremniter Julie, Broutin Lauranne, Michaud Anthony, Silvain Christine, Burucoa Christophe
University Hospital La Milétrie, Infectious Agents Department, Poitiers, France
University of Poitiers, LITEC EA4331, Faculty Medecine Pharmacy, Poitiers, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Mar 25;58(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01787-19.
The noninvasive detection of and its resistance to clarithromycin could revolutionize the management of -infected patients by tailoring eradication treatment without any need for endoscopy when histology is not necessary. Several real-time PCR tests performed on stools have been proposed, but their performances were either poor or they were tested on too few patients to be properly evaluated. We conducted a prospective, multicenter study including 1,200 adult patients who were addressed for gastroduodenal endoscopy with gastric biopsies and who were naive for eradication treatment in order to evaluate the performance of the Amplidiag +ClariR assay recently developed by Mobidiag (Espoo, Finland). The results of the Amplidiag +ClariR assay performed on DNA from stools (automatic extraction with the EasyMag system [bioMérieux]) were compared with those of culture/Etest and quadruplex real-time PCRs performed on two gastric biopsy samples (from the antrum and corpus) to detect the gene and mutations in the 23S rRNA genes conferring clarithromycin resistance. The sensitivity and specificity of the detection of were 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92 to 98%) and 98.7% (95% CI, 97 to 99%), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were evaluated to be 92.2% (95% CI, 92 to 98%) and 99.3% (95% CI, 98 to 99%), respectively. In this cohort, 160 patients (14.7%) were found to be infected (positive by culture and/or PCR). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting resistance to clarithromycin were 100% (95% CI, 88 to 100%) and 98.4% (95% CI, 94 to 99%), respectively.
对其进行无创检测及其对克拉霉素的耐药性,可通过量身定制根除治疗,在无需组织学检查且无需进行内镜检查的情况下,彻底改变幽门螺杆菌感染患者的管理方式。已经提出了几种对粪便进行的实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测方法,但其性能要么较差,要么所检测的患者数量过少,无法得到恰当评估。我们开展了一项前瞻性多中心研究,纳入1200例因胃十二指肠内镜检查及胃活检前来就诊、且未曾接受过根除治疗的成年患者,以评估由Mobidiag公司(芬兰埃斯波)最近研发的Amplidiag +ClariR检测法的性能。将对粪便DNA(使用EasyMag系统[生物梅里埃公司]自动提取)进行的Amplidiag +ClariR检测结果,与对两份胃活检样本(取自胃窦和胃体)进行的培养/Etest及四重实时PCR检测结果进行比较,以检测幽门螺杆菌基因以及23S核糖体RNA基因中赋予克拉霉素耐药性的突变。检测幽门螺杆菌的敏感性和特异性分别为96.3%(95%置信区间[CI],92%至98%)和98.7%(95%CI,97%至99%)。阳性和阴性预测值分别评估为92.2%(95%CI,92%至98%)和99.3%(95%CI,98%至99%)。在该队列中,发现160例患者(14.7%)受到感染(培养和/或PCR检测呈阳性)。检测对克拉霉素耐药性的敏感性和特异性分别为100%(95%CI,88%至100%)和98.4%(95%CI,94%至99%)。