Bacteriology, Cochin Hospital, University of Paris-Descartes, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Université Versailles- Saint Quentin, Boulogne, France.
Helicobacter. 2019 Apr;24(2):e12560. doi: 10.1111/hel.12560. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
Adapted treatments for Helicobacter pylori infection, guided by determining antimicrobial resistance, are associated with high eradication rates. We evaluated the performance of the Amplidiag H. pylori + ClariR PCR assay (Amplidiag ) for detecting H. pylori and its clarithromycin resistance from gastric biopsies taken during endoscopy in comparison to culture and our "in-house" PCR.
A total of 127 gastric biopsies were analyzed (98 adults; 29 children). Culture, PCR Amplidiag , and in-house PCR were performed in parallel. The in-house PCR combined amplification and sequencing of a 267-bp fragment of the H. pylori 23S rRNA gene. Discrepancies were controlled by amplification of glmM gene.
For detection of H. pylori, Amplidiag and the in-house PCR were concordant in 118 of 127 of cases: 66 negative and 52 positive. Discrepancies were observed in nine cases, all with low bacterial load: Amplidiag did not detect seven biopsies positive on in-house PCR but detected two positive biopsies that were negative on in-house PCR. Among the 19 of 52 (36%) H. pylori cases resistant to clarithromycin, only four biopsies with mixed populations exhibited discordant results between the two PCR methods. The A2142T mutation was not detected by Amplidiag . With the in-house PCR and amplified glmM gene as the reference method, the sensitivity and specificity of Amplidiag was 88.5% (95% confidence interval 83-94.1) and 100%.
This study demonstrated the high sensitivity of the PCR-based Amplidiag H. pylori test, especially with low H. pylori load, and the probability of its clarithromycin resistance analysis. For clinical use, a well-designed trial with a large scale of samples may still be needed.
根据确定抗菌药物耐药性,对幽门螺杆菌感染进行适应性治疗与高根除率相关。我们评估了 Amplidiag H. pylori + ClariR PCR 检测试剂盒(Amplidiag)检测胃镜活检组织中幽门螺杆菌及其克拉霉素耐药性的性能,与培养和我们的“内部”PCR 进行比较。
共分析了 127 例胃活检标本(98 例成人;29 例儿童)。平行进行培养、PCR Amplidiag 和内部 PCR。内部 PCR 对幽门螺杆菌 23S rRNA 基因的 267bp 片段进行扩增和测序。通过扩增 glmM 基因来控制差异。
对于幽门螺杆菌的检测,Amplidiag 与内部 PCR 在 127 例中的 118 例中一致:66 例阴性,52 例阳性。在 9 例中观察到差异,所有这些差异均为低细菌负荷:Amplidiag 未检测到内部 PCR 阳性的 7 例活检,但检测到内部 PCR 阴性的 2 例阳性活检。在 52 例(36%)对克拉霉素耐药的幽门螺杆菌病例中,只有 4 例混合人群的活检标本两种 PCR 方法结果不一致。Amplidiag 未检测到 A2142T 突变。以内部 PCR 和扩增的 glmM 基因为参考方法,Amplidiag 的敏感性和特异性分别为 88.5%(95%置信区间 83-94.1)和 100%。
本研究表明基于 PCR 的 Amplidiag 幽门螺杆菌检测具有很高的敏感性,尤其是在低幽门螺杆菌负荷的情况下,并且可以进行克拉霉素耐药性分析。对于临床应用,可能仍需要进行一项设计良好、规模较大的试验。