Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Apr 10;62(4):e0161123. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01611-23. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
Rapid identification of pathogens in normally sterile body fluid (NSBF) is essential for appropriate patient management, specifically antimicrobial therapy. Limited sensitivity and increased time to detection of traditional culture prompted us to evaluate additional testing to contribute to the diagnosis of infection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panels on positive body fluids inoculated into blood culture bottles for the detection of microorganisms. A total of 88 positive body fluids from blood culture bottles were analyzed using a Gram-Positive, Gram-Negative, and/or Fungal pathogen BCID Panel based on the Gram stain result. Each result was compared to routine culture performed from the positive bottle. When using culture as a reference standard, we found the ePlex multiplex panel performed with a positive percent agreement of 96.5% and a negative percent agreement of 99.8%. The use of multiplex PCR may be a useful supplement to routine culture for NSBF in blood culture bottles.
The identification of pathogens in normally sterile body fluid (NSBF) is performed using routine culture, the current gold standard. Limitations of this method include sensitivity and increased turnaround times which could potentially delay vital patient care, especially antimicrobial therapy. Adaptations of NSBF in blood culture bottles prompted us to consider the utility of additional methods to bridge the gap in diagnostic challenges for these life-threatening infections. Multiplex molecular panels have been manufactured for use with multiple specimen types including blood, cerebral spinal fluid, stool, and respiratory. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the off-label use of ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels on positive body fluids grown in blood culture bottles for the detection of microorganisms for research purposes.
在正常无菌体液(NSBF)中快速鉴定病原体对于适当的患者管理至关重要,特别是抗菌治疗。传统培养的敏感性有限且检测时间延长,促使我们评估额外的检测方法以有助于感染的诊断。本研究旨在评估 GenMarkDx ePlex 血培养鉴定(BCID)面板在接种到血培养瓶中的阳性体液中检测微生物的性能。根据革兰氏染色结果,使用革兰氏阳性、革兰氏阴性和/或真菌病原体 BCID 面板分析了总共 88 份来自血培养瓶的阳性体液。将每个结果与从阳性瓶中进行的常规培养进行比较。当以培养为参考标准时,我们发现 ePlex 多重检测面板的阳性符合率为 96.5%,阴性符合率为 99.8%。多重 PCR 的使用可能是血培养瓶中 NSBF 常规培养的有用补充。
正常无菌体液(NSBF)中的病原体鉴定采用常规培养,这是目前的金标准。这种方法的局限性包括敏感性和周转时间延长,这可能会延迟重要的患者护理,特别是抗菌治疗。NSBF 在血培养瓶中的适应促使我们考虑额外方法的效用,以弥补这些危及生命的感染的诊断挑战。用于多种标本类型的多重分子面板已经制造出来,包括血液、脑脊液、粪便和呼吸道。因此,本研究旨在评估 ePlex 血培养鉴定面板在血培养瓶中生长的阳性体液中用于检测微生物的非标签用途,用于研究目的。