Ashley L. Greiner, MD, MPH, is Emergency Response Capacity Development Unit Lead, Emergency Response and Recovery Branch, Division of Global Health Protection, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.Tasha Stehling-Ariza, PhD, Dante Bugli, MPH, Adela Hoffman, MPH, and Coralie Giese, MSc, are Epidemiologists;Lisa Moorhouse, MPH, is Deputy Team Lead;John C. Neatherlin, MPH, is West Africa Regional Advisor;Cyrus Shahpar, MD, MPH, is Team Lead; all of the Global Rapid Response Team, Emergency Response and Recovery Branch, Division of Global Health Protection, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Health Secur. 2020 Jan;18(S1):S8-S13. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0060.
The International Health Regulations (2005) dictate the need for states parties to establish capacity to respond promptly and effectively to public health risks. Public health rapid response teams (RRTs) can fulfill this need as a component of a larger public health emergency response infrastructure. However, lack of a standardized approach to establishing and managing RRTs can lead to substantial delays in effective response measures. As part of the Global Health Security Agenda, national governments have sought to develop and more formally institute their RRTs. RRT challenges were identified from 21 countries spanning 4 continents from 2016 to 2018 through direct observation of RRTs deployed during public health emergencies, discussions with RRT managers involved in outbreak response, and during formal RRT management training workshops. One major challenge identified is the development and maintenance of an RRT roster to ensure deployable surge staff identification, selection, and availability. Another challenge is ensuring that RRT members are trained and have the relevant competencies to be effective in the field. Finally, the lack of defined RRT standard operating procedures covering both nonemergency maintenance measures and the multistage emergency response processes required for RRT function can delay the RRT's response time and effectiveness. These findings highlight the importance of planning to preemptively address these challenges to ensure rapid and effective response measures, ultimately strengthening global health security.
《国际卫生条例(2005)》规定,缔约国需要建立迅速、有效地应对公共卫生风险的能力。公共卫生快速反应小组(RRT)可以作为更大的公共卫生应急响应基础设施的一部分,满足这一需求。然而,由于缺乏建立和管理 RRT 的标准化方法,可能会导致有效应对措施的严重延误。作为全球卫生安全议程的一部分,各国政府一直在努力制定并更正式地设立其 RRT。从 2016 年到 2018 年,通过对公共卫生突发事件期间部署的 RRT 进行直接观察、与参与疫情应对的 RRT 管理人员进行讨论,以及在正式的 RRT 管理培训研讨会上,从四大洲的 21 个国家中确定了 RRT 面临的挑战。一个主要挑战是制定和维护 RRT 名册,以确保可部署的应急人员的识别、选择和可用性。另一个挑战是确保 RRT 成员接受过培训,并具备在现场有效工作的相关能力。最后,缺乏涵盖非紧急维护措施和 RRT 功能所需的多阶段应急响应过程的明确的 RRT 标准作业程序,可能会延迟 RRT 的响应时间和效果。这些发现强调了预先计划以应对这些挑战的重要性,以确保迅速有效的应对措施,最终加强全球卫生安全。