Suppr超能文献

使用动态评估研究社交焦虑症:系统评价。

Studies of Social Anxiety Using Ambulatory Assessment: Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Jaume I University, Castellon de la Plana, Spain.

Fundación Aiglé, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Apr 4;11:e46593. doi: 10.2196/46593.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been an increased interest in understanding social anxiety (SA) and SA disorder (SAD) antecedents and consequences as they occur in real time, resulting in a proliferation of studies using ambulatory assessment (AA). Despite the exponential growth of research in this area, these studies have not been synthesized yet.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to identify and describe the latest advances in the understanding of SA and SAD through the use of AA.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science.

RESULTS

A total of 70 articles met the inclusion criteria. The qualitative synthesis of these studies showed that AA permitted the exploration of the emotional, cognitive, and behavioral dynamics associated with the experience of SA and SAD. In line with the available models of SA and SAD, emotion regulation, perseverative cognition, cognitive factors, substance use, and interactional patterns were the principal topics of the included studies. In addition, the incorporation of AA to study psychological interventions, multimodal assessment using sensors and biosensors, and transcultural differences were some of the identified emerging topics.

CONCLUSIONS

AA constitutes a very powerful methodology to grasp SA from a complementary perspective to laboratory experiments and usual self-report measures, shedding light on the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral antecedents and consequences of SA and the development and maintenance of SAD as a mental disorder.

摘要

背景

随着人们越来越关注社交焦虑(SA)和社交焦虑障碍(SAD)的实时发生的前因后果,使用动态评估(AA)的研究也越来越多。尽管该领域的研究呈指数级增长,但这些研究尚未得到综合。

目的

本综述旨在通过使用 AA 来确定和描述对 SA 和 SAD 的最新理解进展。

方法

根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,在 Scopus、PubMed 和 Web of Science 中进行了系统的文献检索。

结果

共有 70 篇文章符合纳入标准。对这些研究的定性综合表明,AA 允许探索与 SA 和 SAD 体验相关的情感、认知和行为动态。与现有的 SA 和 SAD 模型一致,情绪调节、持续认知、认知因素、物质使用和相互作用模式是纳入研究的主要主题。此外,将 AA 纳入研究心理干预、使用传感器和生物传感器的多模态评估以及跨文化差异是一些已确定的新兴主题。

结论

AA 是一种非常强大的方法,可以从实验室实验和常用的自我报告测量的补充角度来理解 SA,揭示 SA 的认知、情感和行为前因后果,以及 SAD 作为一种精神障碍的发展和维持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a7f/11027061/be7d1f00d833/mental_v11i1e46593_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验