• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用动态评估研究社交焦虑症:系统评价。

Studies of Social Anxiety Using Ambulatory Assessment: Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Jaume I University, Castellon de la Plana, Spain.

Fundación Aiglé, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Apr 4;11:e46593. doi: 10.2196/46593.

DOI:10.2196/46593
PMID:38574359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11027061/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been an increased interest in understanding social anxiety (SA) and SA disorder (SAD) antecedents and consequences as they occur in real time, resulting in a proliferation of studies using ambulatory assessment (AA). Despite the exponential growth of research in this area, these studies have not been synthesized yet.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to identify and describe the latest advances in the understanding of SA and SAD through the use of AA.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science.

RESULTS

A total of 70 articles met the inclusion criteria. The qualitative synthesis of these studies showed that AA permitted the exploration of the emotional, cognitive, and behavioral dynamics associated with the experience of SA and SAD. In line with the available models of SA and SAD, emotion regulation, perseverative cognition, cognitive factors, substance use, and interactional patterns were the principal topics of the included studies. In addition, the incorporation of AA to study psychological interventions, multimodal assessment using sensors and biosensors, and transcultural differences were some of the identified emerging topics.

CONCLUSIONS

AA constitutes a very powerful methodology to grasp SA from a complementary perspective to laboratory experiments and usual self-report measures, shedding light on the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral antecedents and consequences of SA and the development and maintenance of SAD as a mental disorder.

摘要

背景

随着人们越来越关注社交焦虑(SA)和社交焦虑障碍(SAD)的实时发生的前因后果,使用动态评估(AA)的研究也越来越多。尽管该领域的研究呈指数级增长,但这些研究尚未得到综合。

目的

本综述旨在通过使用 AA 来确定和描述对 SA 和 SAD 的最新理解进展。

方法

根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,在 Scopus、PubMed 和 Web of Science 中进行了系统的文献检索。

结果

共有 70 篇文章符合纳入标准。对这些研究的定性综合表明,AA 允许探索与 SA 和 SAD 体验相关的情感、认知和行为动态。与现有的 SA 和 SAD 模型一致,情绪调节、持续认知、认知因素、物质使用和相互作用模式是纳入研究的主要主题。此外,将 AA 纳入研究心理干预、使用传感器和生物传感器的多模态评估以及跨文化差异是一些已确定的新兴主题。

结论

AA 是一种非常强大的方法,可以从实验室实验和常用的自我报告测量的补充角度来理解 SA,揭示 SA 的认知、情感和行为前因后果,以及 SAD 作为一种精神障碍的发展和维持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a7f/11027061/be7d1f00d833/mental_v11i1e46593_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a7f/11027061/be7d1f00d833/mental_v11i1e46593_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a7f/11027061/be7d1f00d833/mental_v11i1e46593_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Studies of Social Anxiety Using Ambulatory Assessment: Systematic Review.使用动态评估研究社交焦虑症:系统评价。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Apr 4;11:e46593. doi: 10.2196/46593.
2
Pharmacotherapy for anxiety and comorbid alcohol use disorders.焦虑症合并酒精使用障碍的药物治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 20;1(1):CD007505. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007505.pub2.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
The Impact of Social Media Use Interventions on Mental Well-Being: Systematic Review.社交媒体使用干预对心理健康的影响:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 11;25:e44922. doi: 10.2196/44922.
5
Parent-training programmes for improving maternal psychosocial health.改善孕产妇心理社会健康的家长培训项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002020.pub2.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Effectiveness and User Experience of Virtual Reality for Social Anxiety Disorder: Systematic Review.虚拟现实治疗社交焦虑障碍的效果和用户体验:系统评价。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Feb 8;11:e48916. doi: 10.2196/48916.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
10
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.创伤后应激障碍及共病物质使用障碍的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
State and Trait Emotion Regulation Diversity in Social Anxiety.社交焦虑中状态和特质情绪调节的差异
Clin Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;11(5):894-909. doi: 10.1177/21677026231151956. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
2
m-Path: an easy-to-use and highly tailorable platform for ecological momentary assessment and intervention in behavioral research and clinical practice.m-Path:一个易于使用且高度可定制的平台,用于行为研究和临床实践中的生态瞬时评估与干预。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Oct 18;5:1182175. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1182175. eCollection 2023.
3
Pride in social anxiety disorder.
社交焦虑障碍中的自尊
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 Oct;99:102759. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102759. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
4
Social anxiety and interpersonal risk for suicidal ideation: A longitudinal daily diary analysis.社交焦虑与自杀意念的人际风险:一项纵向每日日记分析。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2023 Dec;53(6):968-980. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12996. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
5
Assessing Emotion Polyregulation in Daily Life: Who Uses It, When Is It Used, and How Effective Is It?评估日常生活中的情绪多元调节:谁在使用它、何时使用以及效果如何?
Affect Sci. 2022 Dec 8;4(2):248-259. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00166-x. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Triggers of self-focused attention: an ecological momentary assessment study.自我关注的触发因素:一项生态瞬时评估研究。
Biopsychosoc Med. 2023 Apr 23;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13030-023-00273-6.
7
Emotions in social anxiety disorder: A review.社交焦虑障碍中的情绪:综述。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 Apr;95:102696. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102696. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
8
Using substances to cope with social anxiety: Associations with use and consequences in daily life.使用物质应对社交焦虑:与日常生活中的使用和后果的关联。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Jun;37(4):581-591. doi: 10.1037/adb0000899. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
9
Ecological momentary assessment of post-event processing in between two speech tasks: Relationships with cognitive and affective factors involved in the maintenance of social anxiety.在两项言语任务之间的事件后加工的生态瞬时评估:与维持社交焦虑相关的认知和情感因素的关系。
Behav Res Ther. 2022 Dec;159:104208. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104208. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
10
Some Recommendations on the Use of Daily Life Methods in Affective Science.关于情感科学中日常生活方法使用的一些建议。
Affect Sci. 2022 Mar 19;3(2):505-515. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00101-0. eCollection 2022 Jun.