School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sleep. 2020 Aug 12;43(8). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa011.
The usage of wrist-worn wearables to detect sleep-wake states remains a formidable challenge, particularly among individuals with disordered sleep. We developed a novel and unbiased data-driven method for the detection of sleep-wake and compared its performance with the well-established Oakley algorithm (OA) relative to polysomnography (PSG) in elderly men with disordered sleep.
Overnight in-lab PSG from 102 participants was compared with accelerometry and photoplethysmography simultaneously collected with a wearable device (Empatica E4). A binary segmentation algorithm was used to detect change points in these signals. A model that estimates sleep or wake states given the changes in these signals was established (change point decoder, CPD). The CPD's performance was compared with the performance of the OA in relation to PSG.
On the testing set, OA provided sleep accuracy of 0.85, wake accuracy of 0.54, AUC of 0.67, and Kappa of 0.39. Comparable values for CPD were 0.70, 0.74, 0.78, and 0.40. The CPD method had sleep onset latency error of -22.9 min, sleep efficiency error of 2.09%, and underestimated the number of sleep-wake transitions with an error of 64.4. The OA method's performance was 28.6 min, -0.03%, and -17.2, respectively.
The CPD aggregates information from both cardiac and motion signals for state determination as well as the cross-dimensional influences from these domains. Therefore, CPD classification achieved balanced performance and higher AUC, despite underestimating sleep-wake transitions. The CPD could be used as an alternate framework to investigate sleep-wake dynamics within the conventional time frame of 30-s epochs.
腕戴可穿戴设备在检测睡眠-觉醒状态方面仍然具有挑战性,尤其是在睡眠障碍患者中。我们开发了一种新颖的、无偏的数据驱动方法来检测睡眠-觉醒,并将其与经过验证的 Oakley 算法(OA)在睡眠障碍的老年男性中与多导睡眠图(PSG)进行比较。
比较了 102 名参与者的整夜实验室 PSG 与可穿戴设备同时采集的加速度计和光体积描记法数据。使用二进制分割算法检测这些信号中的变化点。建立了一个基于这些信号变化来估计睡眠或觉醒状态的模型(变化点解码器,CPD)。将 CPD 的性能与 OA 相对于 PSG 的性能进行比较。
在测试集中,OA 提供的睡眠准确率为 0.85、觉醒准确率为 0.54、AUC 为 0.67、Kappa 为 0.39。CPD 的可比值分别为 0.70、0.74、0.78 和 0.40。CPD 方法的睡眠潜伏期误差为-22.9 分钟,睡眠效率误差为 2.09%,低估了睡眠-觉醒转换次数,误差为 64.4。OA 方法的性能分别为 28.6 分钟、-0.03%和-17.2。
CPD 聚合了来自心脏和运动信号的信息来确定状态,以及来自这些领域的跨维度影响。因此,尽管低估了睡眠-觉醒转换次数,CPD 分类仍实现了平衡的性能和更高的 AUC。CPD 可以作为一种替代框架,在传统的 30 秒时间段内研究睡眠-觉醒动态。