• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用机器学习预测剖宫产术后阴道分娩。

Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveries using machine learning.

机构信息

The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel; Obstetrics & Gynecology Division, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;222(6):613.e1-613.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.267. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.267
PMID:32007491
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Efforts to reduce cesarean delivery rates to 12-15% have been undertaken worldwide. Special focus has been directed towards parturients who undergo a trial of labor after cesarean delivery to reduce the burden of repeated cesarean deliveries. Complication rates are lowest when a vaginal birth is achieved and highest when an unplanned cesarean delivery is performed, which emphasizes the need to assess, in advance, the likelihood of a successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery calculators have been developed in different populations; however, some limitations to their implementation into clinical practice have been described. Machine-learning methods enable investigation of large-scale datasets with input combinations that traditional statistical analysis tools have difficulty processing.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using machine-learning methods to predict a successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

The electronic medical records of singleton, term labors during a 12-year period in a tertiary referral center were analyzed. With the use of gradient boosting, models that incorporated multiple maternal and fetal features were created to predict successful vaginal birth in parturients who undergo a trial of labor after cesarean delivery. One model was created to provide a personalized risk score for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery with the use of features that are available as early as the first antenatal visit; a second model was created that reassesses this score after features are added that are available only in proximity to delivery.

RESULTS

A cohort of 9888 parturients with 1 previous cesarean delivery was identified, of which 75.6% of parturients (n=7473) attempted a trial of labor, with a success rate of 88%. A machine-learning-based model to predict when vaginal delivery would be successful was developed. When features that are available at the first antenatal visit are used, the model showed a receiver operating characteristic curve with area under the curve of 0.745 (95% confidence interval, 0.728-0.762) that increased to 0.793 (95% confidence interval, 0.778-0.808) when features that are available in proximity to the delivery process were added. Additionally, for the later model, a risk stratification tool was built to allocate parturients into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups for failed trial of labor after cesarean delivery. The low- and medium-risk groups (42.4% and 25.6% of parturients, respectively) showed a success rate of 97.3% and 90.9%, respectively. The high-risk group (32.1%) had a vaginal delivery success rate of 73.3%. Application of the model to a cohort of parturients who elected a repeat cesarean delivery (n=2145) demonstrated that 31% of these parturients would have been allocated to the low- and medium-risk groups had a trial of labor been attempted.

CONCLUSION

Trial of labor after cesarean delivery is safe for most parturients. Success rates are high, even in a population with high rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Application of a machine-learning algorithm to assign a personalized risk score for a successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery may help in decision-making and contribute to a reduction in cesarean delivery rates. Parturient allocation to risk groups may help delivery process management.

摘要

背景

全球范围内都在努力将剖宫产率降低到 12-15%。特别关注的是那些在剖宫产后尝试阴道分娩的产妇,以减少重复剖宫产的负担。当阴道分娩成功时,并发症发生率最低,而当计划外剖宫产时,并发症发生率最高,这强调了需要提前评估剖宫产后阴道分娩成功的可能性。不同人群已经开发了剖宫产后阴道分娩计算器,但在将其应用于临床实践方面存在一些限制。机器学习方法可以用于研究具有传统统计分析工具难以处理的输入组合的大规模数据集。

目的

本研究旨在评估使用机器学习方法预测剖宫产后阴道分娩成功的可行性。

研究设计

分析了 12 年内一家三级转诊中心的单胎足月分娩的电子病历。使用梯度提升,为剖宫产后尝试阴道分娩的产妇创建了包含多个母婴特征的模型,以预测阴道分娩成功。创建了一个模型,使用最早在第一次产前检查中可用的特征,为剖宫产后阴道分娩提供个性化风险评分;创建了第二个模型,在添加仅在接近分娩时可用的特征后重新评估此评分。

结果

确定了 9888 名有 1 次剖宫产史的产妇队列,其中 75.6%(n=7473)的产妇尝试了阴道试产,成功率为 88%。开发了一种基于机器学习的预测阴道分娩成功的模型。当使用在第一次产前检查中可用的特征时,该模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.745(95%置信区间,0.728-0.762),当添加在接近分娩过程中可用的特征时,该面积增加到 0.793(95%置信区间,0.778-0.808)。此外,对于后期模型,构建了一个风险分层工具,将产妇分为低风险、中风险和高风险组,以评估剖宫产后阴道试产失败的风险。低风险和中风险组(分别为产妇的 42.4%和 25.6%)的成功率分别为 97.3%和 90.9%。高风险组(32.1%)的阴道分娩成功率为 73.3%。将该模型应用于选择再次剖宫产的产妇队列(n=2145),结果表明,如果尝试阴道试产,其中 31%的产妇将被分配到低风险和中风险组。

结论

剖宫产后阴道试产对大多数产妇是安全的。成功率很高,即使在剖宫产后阴道试产率较高的人群中也是如此。应用机器学习算法为剖宫产后阴道分娩成功分配个性化风险评分可能有助于决策,并有助于降低剖宫产率。将产妇分配到风险组可能有助于分娩过程管理。

相似文献

1
Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveries using machine learning.采用机器学习预测剖宫产术后阴道分娩。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;222(6):613.e1-613.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.267. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
Real-time data analysis using a machine learning model significantly improves prediction of successful vaginal deliveries.使用机器学习模型进行实时数据分析可显著提高阴道分娩成功的预测能力。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):437.e1-437.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.025. Epub 2020 May 17.
3
Predicting obstetrical anal sphincter injuries in patients who undergo vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.预测剖宫产术后经阴道分娩患者的产科肛门括约肌损伤。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):173.e1-173.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
4
Obstetrician call schedule and obstetric outcomes among women eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean.剖宫产术后适合进行试产的女性的产科医生值班安排及产科结局
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):75.e1-75.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.032. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
5
Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术后再次妊娠经阴道分娩双胎的随机对照试验:系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):336-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.125. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
6
Trial of labor after 2 previous cesareans: a multicenter study.2 次剖宫产术后试产:一项多中心研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Apr;6(4):101209. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101209. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
7
Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean accurate?剖宫产术后阴道分娩预测模型准确吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;220(5):492.e1-492.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.232. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
8
The Feasibility of a Trial of Labor after Two Cesarean Deliveries: Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for Success.两次剖宫产术后试产的可行性:成功的结局和预测因素。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e2636-e2644. doi: 10.1055/a-2135-6962. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
9
Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity.剖宫产术后经阴道分娩失败:风险有多大?I. 孕产妇发病率
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;184(7):1365-71; discussion 1371-3. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.115044.
10
[Multi-centric clinical study of trial of labor after cesarean section].剖宫产术后阴道试产的多中心临床研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Aug 25;51(8):581-5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.08.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning for preventing stillbirths: is it possible to transform data into life-saving insights?用于预防死产的机器学习:能否将数据转化为挽救生命的见解?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):906. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-08028-7.
2
Development and validation of a machine learning model for prediction of cephalic dystocia.用于预测头位难产的机器学习模型的开发与验证
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Aug 18;25(1):862. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07972-8.
3
Machine Learning Models to Predict Risk of Maternal Morbidity and Mortality From Electronic Medical Record Data: Scoping Review.
利用电子病历数据预测孕产妇发病和死亡风险的机器学习模型:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e68225. doi: 10.2196/68225.
4
Enhancing Obstetric Decision-Making With AI: A Systematic Review of AI Models for Predicting Mode of Delivery.利用人工智能增强产科决策:对预测分娩方式的人工智能模型的系统评价
Cureus. 2025 May 7;17(5):e83655. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83655. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Artificial intelligence-based prediction of second stage duration in labor: a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis.基于人工智能的产程第二阶段持续时间预测:一项多中心回顾性队列分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 20;80:103072. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103072. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
An AI-based approach to predict delivery outcome based on measurable factors of pregnant mothers.一种基于人工智能的方法,用于根据孕妇的可测量因素预测分娩结果。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Feb 5;4(2):e0000543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000543. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
Application of Predictive Analytics in Pregnancy, Birth, and Postpartum Nursing Care.预测分析在妊娠、分娩及产后护理中的应用。
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2025;50(2):66-77. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000001082. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
8
A multimodal model in the prediction of the delivery mode using data from a digital twin-empowered labor monitoring system.一种使用来自数字孪生赋能的分娩监测系统的数据预测分娩方式的多模态模型。
Digit Health. 2024 Dec 8;10:20552076241304934. doi: 10.1177/20552076241304934. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
9
Predicting vaginal delivery after labor induction using machine learning: Development of a multivariable prediction model.使用机器学习预测引产术后的阴道分娩:多变量预测模型的开发
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jan;104(1):164-173. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14953. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
10
Artificial Intelligence in Predicting the Mode of Delivery: A Systematic Review.人工智能在预测分娩方式中的应用:一项系统综述
Cureus. 2024 Sep 10;16(9):e69115. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69115. eCollection 2024 Sep.