• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于人工智能的方法,用于根据孕妇的可测量因素预测分娩结果。

An AI-based approach to predict delivery outcome based on measurable factors of pregnant mothers.

作者信息

Owusu-Adjei Michael, Ben Hayfron-Acquah James, Frimpong Twum, Gaddafi Abdul-Salaam

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

出版信息

PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Feb 5;4(2):e0000543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000543. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000543
PMID:39908236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11798466/
Abstract

The desire for safer delivery mode that preserves the lives of both mother and child with minimal or no complications before, during and after childbirth is the wish for every expectant mother and their families. However, the choice for any particular delivery mode is supposedly influenced by a number of factors that leads to the ultimate decision of choice. Some of the factors identified include maternal birth history, maternal and child health conditions prevailing before and during labor onset. Predictive modeling has been used extensively to determine important contributory factors or artifacts influencing delivery choice in related research studies. However, missing among a myriad of features used in various research studies for this determination is maternal history of spontaneous, threatened and inevitable abortion(s). How its inclusion impacts delivery outcome has not been covered in extensive research work. This research work therefore takes measurable maternal features that include real time information on administered partographs to predict delivery outcome. This is achieved by adopting effective feature selection technique to estimate variable relationships with the target variable. Three supervised learning techniques are used and evaluated for performance. Prediction accuracy score of area under the curve obtained show Gradient Boosting classifier achieved 91% accuracy, Logistic Regression 93% and Random Forest 91%. Balanced accuracy score obtained for these techniques were; Gradient Boosting 82.73%, Logistic Regression 84.62% and Random Forest 83.02%. Correlation statistic for variable independence among input variables showed that delivery outcome type as an output is associated with fetal gestational age and the progress of maternal cervix dilatation during labor onset.

摘要

在分娩前、分娩期间和分娩后,希望有一种更安全的分娩方式,能以最小的并发症或无并发症的方式保护母婴的生命,这是每一位准妈妈及其家人的愿望。然而,任何特定分娩方式的选择可能会受到一些因素的影响,这些因素会导致最终的选择决定。已确定的一些因素包括产妇的分娩史、分娩开始前和期间的母婴健康状况。在相关研究中,预测模型已被广泛用于确定影响分娩选择的重要促成因素或因素。然而,在各种研究中用于此确定的众多特征中,缺少产妇自然流产、先兆流产和难免流产的病史。其纳入如何影响分娩结果在广泛的研究工作中尚未涉及。因此,这项研究工作采用可测量的产妇特征,包括关于使用产程图的实时信息来预测分娩结果。这是通过采用有效的特征选择技术来估计变量与目标变量之间的关系来实现的。使用并评估了三种监督学习技术的性能。获得的曲线下面积预测准确率得分显示,梯度提升分类器达到91%的准确率,逻辑回归为93%,随机森林为91%。这些技术获得的平衡准确率得分分别为:梯度提升82.73%,逻辑回归84.62%,随机森林83.02%。输入变量之间变量独立性的相关统计表明,作为输出的分娩结果类型与胎儿孕周和分娩开始时产妇宫颈扩张的进展有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/bff6e0694fc1/pdig.0000543.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/5676db810a7a/pdig.0000543.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/55fdd57198d2/pdig.0000543.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/e279cfc57587/pdig.0000543.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/23ff62a6c4fc/pdig.0000543.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/743f7226872b/pdig.0000543.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/5873e07d0f0f/pdig.0000543.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/88b09ecce198/pdig.0000543.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/a40f0968c3eb/pdig.0000543.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/1df00cfa1a40/pdig.0000543.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/bff6e0694fc1/pdig.0000543.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/5676db810a7a/pdig.0000543.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/55fdd57198d2/pdig.0000543.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/e279cfc57587/pdig.0000543.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/23ff62a6c4fc/pdig.0000543.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/743f7226872b/pdig.0000543.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/5873e07d0f0f/pdig.0000543.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/88b09ecce198/pdig.0000543.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/a40f0968c3eb/pdig.0000543.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/1df00cfa1a40/pdig.0000543.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126d/11798466/bff6e0694fc1/pdig.0000543.g010.jpg

相似文献

1
An AI-based approach to predict delivery outcome based on measurable factors of pregnant mothers.一种基于人工智能的方法,用于根据孕妇的可测量因素预测分娩结果。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Feb 5;4(2):e0000543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000543. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
5
Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes using machine learning techniques: evidence from analysis of electronic medical records data in Rwanda.使用机器学习技术预测不良妊娠结局:来自卢旺达电子病历数据分析的证据。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 12;25(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02921-z.
6
Artificial Intelligence in Predicting the Mode of Delivery: A Systematic Review.人工智能在预测分娩方式中的应用:一项系统综述
Cureus. 2024 Sep 10;16(9):e69115. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69115. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Investigating Protective and Risk Factors and Predictive Insights for Aboriginal Perinatal Mental Health: Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach.探究原住民围产期心理健康的保护因素、风险因素及预测性见解:可解释人工智能方法
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e68030. doi: 10.2196/68030.
8
Development and validation of prediction models for fetal growth restriction and birthweight: an individual participant data meta-analysis.胎儿生长受限和出生体重预测模型的建立与验证:个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(47):1-119. doi: 10.3310/DABW4814.
9
A prediction tool for mode of delivery in twin pregnancies-a secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study.双胎妊娠分娩方式预测工具——双胎分娩研究的二次分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul;231(1):124.e1-124.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1230. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
10
Planned delivery for pre-eclampsia between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation: the PHOENIX RCT.孕34至37周子痫前期的计划性分娩:PHOENIX随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Dec;27(28):1-22. doi: 10.3310/CWWH0622.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of caesarean section birth using machine learning algorithms among pregnant women in a district hospital in Ghana.在加纳一家区级医院的孕妇中使用机器学习算法预测剖宫产分娩
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07716-8.
2
Enhancing Obstetric Decision-Making With AI: A Systematic Review of AI Models for Predicting Mode of Delivery.利用人工智能增强产科决策:对预测分娩方式的人工智能模型的系统评价
Cureus. 2025 May 7;17(5):e83655. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83655. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine Learning-Based Approach to Predict Intrauterine Growth Restriction.基于机器学习的预测胎儿生长受限的方法。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 6;15(7):e41448. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41448. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Prediction of postpartum hemorrhage using traditional statistical analysis and a machine learning approach.使用传统统计分析和机器学习方法预测产后出血。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Feb 17;3(2):100185. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100185. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Application of machine learning to identify risk factors of birth asphyxia.
机器学习在识别出生窒息危险因素中的应用。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05486-9.
4
Gestational age at birth and cognitive outcomes in adolescence: population based full sibling cohort study.出生时的胎龄与青少年认知结局:基于人群的全同胞队列研究。
BMJ. 2023 Jan 18;380:e072779. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072779.
5
Knowledge and skills used for clinical decision-making on childbirth interventions: A qualitative study among midwives in the Netherlands.用于分娩干预临床决策的知识与技能:荷兰助产士的一项定性研究
Eur J Midwifery. 2022 Sep 1;6:56. doi: 10.18332/ejm/151653. eCollection 2022.
6
Impact of labor characteristics on maternal and neonatal outcomes of labor: A machine-learning model.劳动特征对母婴分娩结局的影响:一种机器学习模型。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 22;17(8):e0273178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273178. eCollection 2022.
7
Prediction of labor outcome pilot study: evaluation of primiparous women at term.分娩结局预测试点研究:足月初产妇的评估
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Nov;4(6):100711. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100711. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
8
The Preferences of Modes of Child Delivery and Associated Factors Among Pregnant Women in Southern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚南部孕妇的分娩方式偏好及相关因素
Pragmat Obs Res. 2022 Jul 15;13:59-73. doi: 10.2147/POR.S370513. eCollection 2022.
9
Machine learning to predict pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda.机器学习预测妊娠结局:系统评价、综合框架和未来研究议程。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04594-2.
10
Prediction of Emergency Cesarean Section Using Machine Learning Methods: Development and External Validation of a Nationwide Multicenter Dataset in Republic of Korea.使用机器学习方法预测急诊剖宫产:韩国全国多中心数据集的开发与外部验证
Life (Basel). 2022 Apr 18;12(4):604. doi: 10.3390/life12040604.