The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into obstetric care offers significant potential to enhance clinical decision-making and optimize maternal and neonatal outcomes. Traditional prediction methods for mode of delivery often rely on subjective clinical judgment and limited statistical models, which may not fully capture complex patient data. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current state of research on AI applications in predicting the mode of delivery, comparing the performance of AI models with traditional methods, and identifying gaps for future research. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, covering publications from January 2010 to July 2024. Inclusion criteria were studies employing AI techniques to predict the mode of delivery, published in peer-reviewed journals, and involving human subjects. Studies were assessed for quality using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST), and data were synthesized narratively due to heterogeneity. In total, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, employing various AI models such as logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting, and neural networks. Sample sizes ranged from 40 to 94,480 participants across diverse geographic settings. AI models demonstrated high accuracy rates, often exceeding 90%, and strong predictive metrics (area under the curve (AUC) values from 0.745 to 0.932). Key predictors included maternal age, gravidity, parity, gestational age, labor induction type, and fetal weight. Notable models like the Adana System and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost, Yandex LLC, Moscow, Russia) highlighted the effectiveness of AI in enhancing prediction accuracy and supporting clinical decisions. AI models significantly outperform traditional statistical methods in predicting the mode of delivery, providing a robust tool for obstetric care. Future research should focus on standardizing data collection, improving model interpretability, addressing ethical concerns, and ensuring fairness in AI predictions to enhance clinical trust and application.