Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.
Microvasc Res. 2020 May;129:103985. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2020.103985. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a complex disease, difficult to diagnose and often requires advanced imaging. We used mass spectrometry (MS) using discovery approach to search for serum proteins as potential biomarkers in these patients.
We used serum samples from 10 patients with CMD and 10 with normal coronary flow reserve (CFR) admitted to an observation unit where acute myocardial infarction was excluded. We identified CMD using Rb positron emission tomography/computed tomography as CFR <2 in response to regadenoson, in the absence of coronary calcification or regional perfusion defects. We used MS to identify potential protein biomarkers that were differentially expressed in cases and controls.
Baseline characteristics were not different between cases and controls, except for beta-blocker use and which was higher in cases, and mean (SD) CFR which was lower in cases [1.19 (0.23) and 2.78 (0.78) in cases and controls respectively; p < 0.01]. We identified 5345 peptides corresponding to 209 proteins, and identified 197 proteins by peptides with suitable properties to infer relative quantitation values. While the calculated values for some proteins (e.g. vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, apolipoprotein C and Von Willebrand Factor) indicate fold-differences between groups, these are most likely a result of high values in only 1-2 patients and are not statistically significant.
Mass spectrometry using discovery approach may not be an adequate method for quantitative assessment of serum proteins in CMD patients. Future MS studies should evaluate other approaches including tissue samples or serial measurements.
冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)是一种复杂的疾病,难以诊断,通常需要先进的影像学检查。我们使用基于发现策略的质谱(MS)来寻找血清蛋白作为这些患者的潜在生物标志物。
我们使用了来自 10 名 CMD 患者和 10 名正常冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)患者的血清样本,这些患者被收入观察病房,排除了急性心肌梗死。我们使用铷正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(Rb-PET/CT)识别 CMD,当在没有冠状动脉钙化或区域性灌注缺陷的情况下,用雷腺苷酸刺激后,CFR < 2。我们使用 MS 来识别在病例和对照组中差异表达的潜在蛋白生物标志物。
除了β受体阻滞剂的使用和病例组更高,以及平均(SD)CFR 病例组更低[分别为 1.19(0.23)和 2.78(0.78);p < 0.01]外,病例和对照组的基线特征没有差异。我们鉴定了 5345 个对应于 209 种蛋白的肽,并用具有合适属性的肽鉴定了 197 种蛋白,以推断相对定量值。虽然一些蛋白的计算值(如血管细胞黏附分子-1、载脂蛋白 C 和血管性血友病因子)表明了组间的倍数差异,但这很可能是由于仅 1-2 名患者的高值造成的,而且没有统计学意义。
基于发现策略的 MS 可能不是 CMD 患者血清蛋白定量评估的适当方法。未来的 MS 研究应评估其他方法,包括组织样本或系列测量。