Suppr超能文献

无监督机器学习揭示具有不同急性损伤特征和长期结局的新型创伤性脑损伤患者表型。

Unsupervised Machine Learning Reveals Novel Traumatic Brain Injury Patient Phenotypes with Distinct Acute Injury Profiles and Long-Term Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jun 15;37(12):1431-1444. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6705. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

Abstract

The heterogeneity of traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a core challenge for the success of interventional clinical trials. Data-driven approaches for patient stratification may help to identify TBI patient phenotypes during the acute injury period as well as facilitate targeted trial patient enrollment and analysis of treatment efficacy. In this study, we implemented an unsupervised machine learning approach to identify TBI subpopulations at injury baseline using data from 1213 TBI patients who participated in the Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment Trial (COBRIT) Trial. A wrapper framework utilizing generalized low-rank models automatically selected relevant clinical features that were subsequently used to cluster patients using a partitioning around medoids clustering algorithm. Using this approach, we identified three patient phenotypes with unique clinical injury profiles based on a subset of acute injury features. Phenotype-specific differences in long-term functional outcome trajectories were respectively observed at 3 and 6 months after injury. In comparison, when patients were grouped by baseline Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), no differences in baseline clinical feature profiles or long-term outcomes were observed. To test phenotype reproducibility in an external validation data set, we used a K-nearest neighbors algorithm to classify subjects in the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Pilot data set into corresponding phenotypes, then measured the Gower's dissimilarities between TRACK-TBI and COBRIT subjects in each phenotype. No significant differences were found between trial subjects within two phenotypes, suggesting that these phenotypes may be generalizable within a broad range of TBI severity. Further, Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) outcomes in the TRACK-TBI data set similarly demonstrated phenotype-specific differences in long-term outcomes. Our results suggest that unsupervised machine learning is a promising and effective approach for discovery of novel injury subpopulations over the conventional GCS-based method, and may improve patient selection in future TBI clinical trials.

摘要

创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 的异质性仍然是干预性临床试验成功的核心挑战。基于数据的患者分层方法可能有助于在急性损伤期识别 TBI 患者表型,并有助于有针对性地招募临床试验患者和分析治疗效果。在这项研究中,我们使用无监督机器学习方法,利用参与 Citicoline 脑损伤治疗试验 (COBRIT) 的 1213 名 TBI 患者的数据,在损伤基线时识别 TBI 亚群。一个利用广义低秩模型的包装框架自动选择相关的临床特征,随后使用分区中位数聚类算法对患者进行聚类。使用这种方法,我们根据一组急性损伤特征,基于独特的临床损伤特征,识别出三种患者表型。在损伤后 3 个月和 6 个月时,分别观察到表型特异性的长期功能结局轨迹差异。相比之下,当根据基线格拉斯哥昏迷量表 (GCS) 对患者进行分组时,基线临床特征谱或长期结局没有差异。为了在外部验证数据集上测试表型的可重复性,我们使用 K-最近邻算法将 Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) 试点数据集的受试者分类为相应的表型,然后测量每个表型中 TRACK-TBI 和 COBRIT 受试者之间的 Gower 不相似性。在两个表型内的试验受试者之间没有发现显著差异,这表明这些表型可能在广泛的 TBI 严重程度范围内具有可推广性。此外,TRACK-TBI 数据集中扩展格拉斯哥结局量表 (GOS-E) 的结果同样表明长期结局存在表型特异性差异。我们的结果表明,无监督机器学习是一种很有前途和有效的方法,可以在传统的基于 GCS 的方法基础上发现新的损伤亚群,从而可能改善未来 TBI 临床试验中的患者选择。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Past, Present, and Future of Traumatic Brain Injury Research.创伤性脑损伤研究的过去、现在与未来。
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2016 Oct;27(4):375-96. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
9
Homogeneous clusters of Alzheimer's disease patient population.阿尔茨海默病患者群体的同质聚类
Biomed Eng Online. 2016 Jul 15;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0183-0.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验