Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 13;12(1):13797. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17489-1.
Machine learning (ML) algorithms are becoming increasingly pervasive in the domains of medical diagnostics and prognostication, afforded by complex deep learning architectures that overcome the limitations of manual feature extraction. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we provide an update on current progress of ML algorithms in point-of-care (POC) automated diagnostic classification systems for lesions of the oral cavity. Studies reporting performance metrics on ML algorithms used in automatic classification of oral regions of interest were identified and screened by 2 independent reviewers from 4 databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. 35 studies were suitable for qualitative synthesis, and 31 for quantitative analysis. Outcomes were assessed using a bivariate random-effects model following an assessment of bias and heterogeneity. 4 distinct methodologies were identified for POC diagnosis: (1) clinical photography; (2) optical imaging; (3) thermal imaging; (4) analysis of volatile organic compounds. Estimated AUROC across all studies was 0.935, and no difference in performance was identified between methodologies. We discuss the various classical and modern approaches to ML employed within identified studies, and highlight issues that will need to be addressed for implementation of automated classification systems in screening and early detection.
机器学习(ML)算法在医学诊断和预后领域的应用越来越广泛,这得益于复杂的深度学习架构,克服了手动特征提取的局限性。在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们提供了关于机器学习算法在口腔病变即时诊断自动分类系统中的最新进展。通过两位独立审稿人从 4 个数据库中筛选出报道了用于自动分类口腔感兴趣区域的 ML 算法性能指标的研究。研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。35 项研究适合定性综合分析,31 项研究适合定量分析。在评估偏倚和异质性后,采用双变量随机效应模型评估结果。我们确定了 4 种用于即时诊断的独特方法:(1)临床摄影;(2)光学成像;(3)热成像;(4)挥发性有机化合物分析。所有研究的估计 AUROC 为 0.935,不同方法之间的性能没有差异。我们讨论了在已确定的研究中使用的各种经典和现代的机器学习方法,并强调了在筛查和早期检测中实施自动分类系统所需解决的问题。