Wittman Hannah, Chappell Michael Jahi, Abson David James, Kerr Rachel Bezner, Blesh Jennifer, Hanspach Jan, Perfecto Ivette, Fischer Joern
1Centre for Sustainable Food Systems and Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, The University of British Columbia, 179-2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada.
2Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Reg Environ Change. 2017;17(5):1291-1301. doi: 10.1007/s10113-016-1045-9. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
The major challenges of improving food security and biodiversity conservation are intricately linked. To date, the intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation has been viewed primarily through an agricultural "production lens"-for example, via the land sparing/sharing framework, or the concept of sustainable intensification. However, a productionist perspective has been criticized for being too narrow, and failing to consider other relevant factors, including policy, equity, and diversity. We propose an approach that conceptualizes rural landscapes as social-ecological systems embedded within intersecting multi-scalar processes. Based on such a framing, empirical research can be more clearly set in the context of system properties that may influence food security, biodiversity conservation, or both. We illustrate our approach through a description of contrasting agricultural systems within Brazil's Cerrado region. We emphasize the need for new empirical research involving systematic comparisons of social-ecological system properties in landscapes threatened by food insecurity and ecosystem degradation.
改善粮食安全和生物多样性保护面临的主要挑战紧密相连。迄今为止,粮食安全与生物多样性保护的交叉点主要是通过农业“生产视角”来看待的——例如,通过土地节约/共享框架或可持续集约化概念。然而,生产主义观点因过于狭隘且未能考虑其他相关因素(包括政策、公平性和多样性)而受到批评。我们提出一种方法,将乡村景观概念化为嵌入相互交叉的多尺度过程中的社会生态系统。基于这样的框架,实证研究可以更清晰地置于可能影响粮食安全、生物多样性保护或两者的系统属性背景中。我们通过描述巴西塞拉多地区形成对比的农业系统来说明我们的方法。我们强调需要开展新的实证研究,对受粮食不安全和生态系统退化威胁的景观中的社会生态系统属性进行系统比较。