• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

供体维护对延迟性肾移植功能的影响:机器学习分析。

The impact of deceased donor maintenance on delayed kidney allograft function: A machine learning analysis.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.

Walter Cantídio University Hospital, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Feb 6;15(2):e0228597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228597. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0228597
PMID:32027717
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7004552/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF) in a country where its incidence is high, detailing donor maintenance-related (DMR) variables and using machine learning (ML) methods beyond the traditional regression-based models.

METHODS

A total of 443 brain dead deceased donor kidney transplants (KT) from two Brazilian centers were retrospectively analyzed and the following DMR were evaluated using predictive modeling: arterial blood gas pH, serum sodium, blood glucose, urine output, mean arterial pressure, vasopressors use, and reversed cardiac arrest.

RESULTS

Most patients (95.7%) received kidneys from standard criteria donors. The incidence of DGF was 53%. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, DMR variables did not impact on DGF occurrence. In post-hoc analysis including only KT with cold ischemia time<21h (n = 220), urine output in 24h prior to recovery surgery (OR = 0.639, 95%CI 0.444-0.919) and serum sodium (OR = 1.030, 95%CI 1.052-1.379) were risk factors for DGF. Using elastic net regularized regression model and ML analysis (decision tree, neural network and support vector machine), urine output and other DMR variables emerged as DGF predictors: mean arterial pressure, ≥ 1 or high dose vasopressors and blood glucose.

CONCLUSIONS

Some DMR variables were associated with DGF, suggesting a potential impact of variables reflecting poor clinical and hemodynamic status on the incidence of DGF.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了在一个发病率较高的国家中延迟移植物功能(DGF)的风险因素,详细描述了与供者维护相关(DMR)的变量,并使用了机器学习(ML)方法,超越了传统的基于回归的模型。

方法

回顾性分析了来自巴西两个中心的 443 例脑死亡已故供者肾移植(KT),使用预测模型评估了以下 DMR:动脉血气 pH 值、血清钠、血糖、尿量、平均动脉压、血管加压素的使用和心脏复苏逆转。

结果

大多数患者(95.7%)接受了标准标准供者的肾脏。DGF 的发生率为 53%。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,DMR 变量对 DGF 的发生没有影响。在后分析中,仅包括冷缺血时间<21h 的 KT(n = 220),恢复手术前 24 小时的尿量(OR = 0.639,95%CI 0.444-0.919)和血清钠(OR = 1.030,95%CI 1.052-1.379)是 DGF 的危险因素。使用弹性网正则化回归模型和 ML 分析(决策树、神经网络和支持向量机),尿量和其他 DMR 变量成为 DGF 的预测因素:平均动脉压、≥1 或高剂量血管加压素和血糖。

结论

一些 DMR 变量与 DGF 相关,这表明反映较差的临床和血液动力学状态的变量可能对 DGF 的发生率有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb15/7004552/a92b77bae3e2/pone.0228597.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb15/7004552/17243a9b3703/pone.0228597.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb15/7004552/a92b77bae3e2/pone.0228597.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb15/7004552/17243a9b3703/pone.0228597.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb15/7004552/a92b77bae3e2/pone.0228597.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of deceased donor maintenance on delayed kidney allograft function: A machine learning analysis.供体维护对延迟性肾移植功能的影响:机器学习分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 6;15(2):e0228597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228597. eCollection 2020.
2
Factors of Acute Kidney Injury Donors Affecting Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation From Deceased Donors.影响已故供体肾移植结局的急性肾损伤供体因素。
Transplant Proc. 2019 Oct;51(8):2575-2581. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.03.068. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
3
A prediction model of delayed graft function in deceased donor for renal transplant: a multi-center study from China.肾移植尸体供者移植肾功能延迟的预测模型:一项来自中国的多中心研究。
Ren Fail. 2021 Dec;43(1):520-529. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2021.1895838.
4
Vasopressor selection during critical care management of brain dead organ donors and the effects on kidney graft function.在脑死亡器官捐献者的重症监护管理期间选择升压药和对肾移植物功能的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jun;88(6):783-788. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002688.
5
Impact of machine perfusion after long static cold storage on delayed graft function incidence and duration and time to hospital discharge.长时间静态冷藏后机器灌注对移植肾功能延迟恢复的发生率、持续时间及出院时间的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2018 Jan;32(1). doi: 10.1111/ctr.13130. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
6
Comparison of Recipient Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation: In-House Versus Imported Deceased Donors.肾移植术后受者结局比较:自体与进口脑死亡供者对比
Transplant Proc. 2018 May;50(4):1025-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.01.035. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
7
Pulsatile perfusion reduces the risk of delayed graft function in deceased donor kidney transplants, irrespective of donor type and cold ischemic time.脉冲式灌注可降低供体来源和冷缺血时间对移植肾延迟功能恢复的影响。
Transplantation. 2014 Mar 27;97(6):668-74. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000438637.29214.10.
8
Long-term effects of delayed graft function duration on function and survival of deceased donor kidney transplants.移植肾功能延迟恢复的持续时间对尸体供肾移植功能及存活的长期影响。
J Bras Nefrol. 2019 Apr-Jun;41(2):231-241. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2018-0065. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
9
An integrated machine learning model enhances delayed graft function prediction in pediatric renal transplantation from deceased donors.基于机器学习的整合模型提高儿童肾移植中来自已故供者移植物延迟功能的预测。
BMC Med. 2024 Sep 20;22(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03624-4.
10
Exploring the causes of the high incidence of delayed graft function after kidney transplantation in Brazil: a multicenter study.探讨巴西肾移植后移植物功能延迟高发的原因:一项多中心研究。
Transpl Int. 2021 Jun;34(6):1093-1104. doi: 10.1111/tri.13865. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between the Kidney Donor Profile Index and one-year outcomes in Brazilian kidney transplant recipients of standard criteria donors.肾脏捐献者特征指数与巴西标准标准供体肾移植受者一年期预后的相关性。
J Bras Nefrol. 2025 Jul-Sep;47(3):e20240219. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2024-0219en.
2
An In-depth overview of artificial intelligence (AI) tool utilization across diverse phases of organ transplantation.人工智能(AI)工具在器官移植不同阶段的应用深度概述。
J Transl Med. 2025 Jun 18;23(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06488-1.
3
Risk factors for delayed graft function in patients with kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The scenario of delayed graft function in Brazil.巴西移植肾功能延迟的情况。
J Bras Nefrol. 2019 Apr-Jun;41(2):166-167. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2018-0221. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
2
The future is coming: promising perspectives regarding the use of machine learning in renal transplantation.未来已来:关于机器学习在肾移植中应用的前景广阔。
J Bras Nefrol. 2019 Apr-Jun;41(2):284-287. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2018-0047. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
Organ donor management and delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
肾移植患者移植肾功能延迟的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 22;15(3):e087128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087128.
4
Present and Future Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Kidney Transplantation.人工智能在肾脏移植中的当前及未来应用
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 5;13(19):5939. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195939.
5
The impact of preservation solutions for static cold storage on kidney transplantation outcomes: Results of a Brazilian nationwide multicenter study.静态低温保存液对肾移植结局的影响:一项巴西全国多中心研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 5;19(7):e0306056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306056. eCollection 2024.
6
Artificial Intelligence Reporting Guidelines' Adherence in Nephrology for Improved Research and Clinical Outcomes.遵循人工智能报告指南以改善肾脏病学研究及临床结局
Biomedicines. 2024 Mar 7;12(3):606. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12030606.
7
Toward generalizing the use of artificial intelligence in nephrology and kidney transplantation.推广人工智能在肾脏病学和肾移植中的应用。
J Nephrol. 2023 May;36(4):1087-1100. doi: 10.1007/s40620-022-01529-0. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
8
Revisiting transplant immunology through the lens of single-cell technologies.通过单细胞技术重新审视移植免疫学。
Semin Immunopathol. 2023 Jan;45(1):91-109. doi: 10.1007/s00281-022-00958-0. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
9
The promise of machine learning applications in solid organ transplantation.机器学习应用在实体器官移植中的前景。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jul 11;5(1):89. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00637-2.
10
Artificial Intelligence-A Tool for Risk Assessment of Delayed-Graft Function in Kidney Transplant.人工智能——肾移植中移植肾功能延迟风险评估的工具
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 11;10(22):5244. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225244.
器官捐献者管理和肾移植受者移植肾功能延迟恢复:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jan;19(1):277-284. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15127. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
4
New Factors Predicting Delayed Graft Function: a Multi-Center Cohort Study of Kidney Donation After Brain Death Followed by Circulatory Death.预测移植肾功能延迟的新因素:一项脑死亡后循环死亡供肾的多中心队列研究
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2018;43(3):893-903. doi: 10.1159/000490337. Epub 2018 May 30.
5
Prediction models for delayed graft function: external validation on The Dutch Prospective Renal Transplantation Registry.延迟移植物功能预测模型:荷兰前瞻性肾移植登记处的外部验证。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Jul 1;33(7):1259-1268. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy019.
6
A Machine Learning Approach Using Survival Statistics to Predict Graft Survival in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Cohort Study.一种使用生存统计的机器学习方法预测肾移植受者移植物存活率:一项多中心队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 21;7(1):8904. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08008-8.
7
Moving beyond regression techniques in cardiovascular risk prediction: applying machine learning to address analytic challenges.超越心血管风险预测中的回归技术:应用机器学习解决分析挑战。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Jun 14;38(23):1805-1814. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw302.
8
Prolonged Delayed Graft Function Is Associated with Inferior Patient and Kidney Allograft Survivals.长期延迟移植肾功能与患者及肾移植受者较差的生存率相关。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 17;10(12):e0144188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144188. eCollection 2015.
9
Prediction of delayed graft function after kidney transplantation: comparison between logistic regression and machine learning methods.肾移植后移植肾功能延迟的预测:逻辑回归与机器学习方法的比较
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Oct 14;15:83. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0206-y.
10
Donor Hemodynamics as a Predictor of Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Cardiac Death.心脏死亡后供体的血流动力学作为肾移植术后结局的预测指标
Am J Transplant. 2016 Jan;16(1):181-93. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13432. Epub 2015 Sep 11.