Centre for Integrated Critical Care, Department of Medicine & Radiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Crit Care. 2020 Feb 6;24(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2733-x.
In patients with vasodilatory shock, plasma concentrations of angiotensin I (ANG I) and II (ANG II) and their ratio may reflect differences in the response to severe vasodilation, provide novel insights into its biology, and predict clinical outcomes. The objective of these protocol prespecified and subsequent post hoc analyses was to assess the epidemiology and outcome associations of plasma ANG I and ANG II levels and their ratio in patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock (CRVS) enrolled in the Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock (ATHOS-3) study.
We measured ANG I and ANG II levels at baseline, calculated their ratio, and compared these results to values from healthy volunteers (controls). We dichotomized patients according to the median ANG I/II ratio (1.63) and compared demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes. We constructed a Cox proportional hazards model to test the independent association of ANG I, ANG II, and their ratio with clinical outcomes.
Median baseline ANG I level (253 pg/mL [interquartile range (IQR) 72.30-676.00 pg/mL] vs 42 pg/mL [IQR 30.46-87.34 pg/mL] in controls; P < 0.0001) and median ANG I/II ratio (1.63 [IQR 0.98-5.25] vs 0.4 [IQR 0.28-0.64] in controls; P < 0.0001) were elevated, whereas median ANG II levels were similar (84 pg/mL [IQR 23.85-299.50 pg/mL] vs 97 pg/mL [IQR 35.27-181.01 pg/mL] in controls; P = 0.9895). At baseline, patients with a ratio above the median (≥1.63) had higher ANG I levels (P < 0.0001), lower ANG II levels (P < 0.0001), higher albumin concentrations (P = 0.007), and greater incidence of recent (within 1 week) exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (P < 0.00001), and they received a higher norepinephrine-equivalent dose (P = 0.003). In the placebo group, a baseline ANG I/II ratio <1.63 was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio 0.56; 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.88; P = 0.01) on unadjusted analyses.
Patients with CRVS have elevated ANG I levels and ANG I/II ratios compared with healthy controls. In such patients, a high ANG I/II ratio is associated with greater norepinephrine requirements and is an independent predictor of mortality, thus providing a biological rationale for interventions aimed at its correction.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02338843. Registered 14 January 2015.
在血管扩张性休克患者中,血管紧张素 I(ANG I)和 II(ANG II)的血浆浓度及其比值可能反映了对严重血管扩张反应的差异,为其生物学提供了新的见解,并预测了临床结果。本方案预设和随后的事后分析的目的是评估在接受儿茶酚胺抵抗性血管扩张性休克(CRVS)治疗的患者中,血浆 ANG I 和 ANG II 水平及其比值的流行病学和预后相关性,这些患者是参加血管紧张素 II 治疗高输出休克(ATHOS-3)研究的患者。
我们在基线时测量 ANG I 和 ANG II 水平,计算它们的比值,并将这些结果与健康志愿者(对照组)的值进行比较。我们根据 ANG I/II 比值的中位数(1.63)将患者分为两组,并比较了人口统计学、临床特征和临床结局。我们构建了 Cox 比例风险模型来测试 ANG I、ANG II 和它们的比值与临床结局的独立关联。
中位基线 ANG I 水平(253 pg/mL [四分位距 72.30-676.00 pg/mL] vs 42 pg/mL [四分位距 30.46-87.34 pg/mL] ,对照组;P < 0.0001)和中位 ANG I/II 比值(1.63 [四分位距 0.98-5.25] vs 0.4 [四分位距 0.28-0.64] ,对照组;P < 0.0001)升高,而中位 ANG II 水平相似(84 pg/mL [四分位距 23.85-299.50 pg/mL] vs 97 pg/mL [四分位距 35.27-181.01 pg/mL] ,对照组;P = 0.9895)。在基线时,比值高于中位数(≥1.63)的患者 ANG I 水平更高(P < 0.0001),ANG II 水平更低(P < 0.0001),白蛋白浓度更高(P = 0.007),近期(1 周内)接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的比例更高(P < 0.00001),接受去甲肾上腺素等效剂量更高(P = 0.003)。在安慰剂组中,基线 ANG I/II 比值<1.63与生存改善相关(风险比 0.56;95%置信区间 0.36-0.88;P = 0.01),未经调整分析。
CRVS 患者的 ANG I 水平和 ANG I/II 比值均高于健康对照组。在这些患者中,高 ANG I/II 比值与更高的去甲肾上腺素需求相关,是死亡率的独立预测因子,从而为旨在纠正其比值的干预措施提供了生物学依据。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT02338843。2015 年 1 月 14 日注册。