Department of Systems Engineering, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, 10996, USA.
Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
J Med Syst. 2020 Feb 6;44(3):61. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-1522-z.
Approximately 23% of patients discharged from primary healthcare facilities are readmitted within 30 days at an annual cost of roughly $42 billion. To remedy this problem, healthcare providers are attempting to deploy readmission risk estimation tools, but how they might be used in the traditional, human-expert-centered decision process is not well understood. One such tool estimates readmission risk based on 50 patient-specific factors. This paper reports on a study performed in collaboration with Order of St. Francis Healthcare to determine how healthcare workers' own risk estimates are influenced by the tool, specifically testing the hypothesis that they will first anchor towards tool results while making adjustments based on their expertise, and then make further adjustments when additional human expert opinions are presented. Task analysis was performed, fictional patient scenarios were developed, and a survey of 56 subjects in two stratified groups of case managers was conducted. Data from the control and experiment groups were analyzed using ANOVA/GLM and t-tests. Results indicate that the healthcare workers' risk estimates were influenced by the anchor provided by the tool, then adjusted based on their expertise. The workers further adjusted their estimates in response to new expert human inputs. Thus, a reliance on both the predictive model and human expertise was observed.
大约 23%从初级保健机构出院的患者在 30 天内再次入院,每年的费用约为 420 亿美元。为了解决这个问题,医疗保健提供者正在尝试部署再入院风险评估工具,但如何在传统的以人为中心的专家决策过程中使用这些工具还不是很清楚。其中一种工具根据 50 个患者特定因素来估计再入院风险。本文报告了一项与圣弗朗西斯医疗秩序合作进行的研究,以确定医疗工作者自己的风险估计是如何受到工具的影响的,特别是检验了以下假设,即他们首先会根据工具的结果进行锚定,然后根据自己的专业知识进行调整,然后在提出更多的人类专家意见时进行进一步的调整。进行了任务分析,开发了虚构的患者场景,并对两个分层病例经理组的 56 名受试者进行了调查。使用 ANOVA/GLM 和 t 检验对对照组和实验组的数据进行了分析。结果表明,医疗工作者的风险估计受到工具提供的锚定的影响,然后根据他们的专业知识进行调整。工作人员根据新的人类专家输入进一步调整了他们的估计。因此,观察到对预测模型和人类专业知识的依赖。