Whether two heads are better than one is the wrong question (though sometimes they are).
作者信息
Hautz Wolf E, Hautz Stefanie C, Kämmer Juliane E
机构信息
Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 16c, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Oudenarder Str. 16, 13347, Berlin, Germany.
出版信息
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Oct;25(4):905-911. doi: 10.1007/s10459-020-09956-z. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Whether two heads are better than one is the wrong question (though sometimes they are).两个脑袋是否比一个脑袋强，这是个错误的问题（尽管有时确实如此）。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Oct;25(4):905-911. doi: 10.1007/s10459-020-09956-z. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
2
[The Dintilhac report and its implications for forensic neuropsychological evaluation].[丁蒂亚克报告及其对法医神经心理学评估的影响]
Encephale. 2010 Apr;36(2):139-46. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
3
Interaction between two myosin heads in acto-smooth muscle heavy meromyosin rigor complex.肌动蛋白-平滑肌重酶解肌球蛋白僵直复合体中两个肌球蛋白头部之间的相互作用。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 1993;332:217-21; discussion 221-3. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2872-2_20.
4
Ultrastructure of the first component of human complement: electron microscopy of the crosslinked complex.人类补体第一成分的超微结构：交联复合物的电子显微镜观察
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jan;79(2):586-90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.2.586.
5
Optimally interacting minds.最佳互动的心灵。
Science. 2010 Aug 27;329(5995):1081-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1185718.
6
Are asymmetric metal markings on the cone surface of ceramic femoral heads an indication of entrapped debris?陶瓷股骨头锥面上的不对称金属标记是否表明存在被困碎片？
Biomed Eng Online. 2014 Apr 4;13:38. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-38.
7
Changing the Question.改变问题。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 Mar;49(2):9-16. doi: 10.1002/hast.988.
8
Reduced wear of cross-linked UHMWPE using magnesia-stabilized zirconia femoral heads in a hip simulator.在髋关节模拟器中使用氧化镁稳定氧化锆股骨头可减少交联超高分子量聚乙烯的磨损。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Aug;469(8):2337-45. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1800-7. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
9
Physicians' beliefs about conscience in medicine: a national survey.医生对医学中良心问题的看法：一项全国性调查。
Acad Med. 2009 Sep;84(9):1276-82. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b18dc5.
10
Three heads are better than two: Comparing learning properties and performances across individuals, dyads, and triads through a computational approach.三个臭皮匠，赛过诸葛亮：通过计算方法比较个体、二人组和三人组的学习属性和表现。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 17;16(6):e0252122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252122. eCollection 2021.
引用本文的文献
1
Effects of interacting with a large language model compared with a human coach on the clinical diagnostic process and outcomes among fourth-year medical students: study protocol for a prospective, randomised experiment using patient vignettes.与大语言模型互动和与人类教练互动对四年级医学生临床诊断过程和结果的影响：一项使用病例简述的前瞻性、随机实验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 18;14(7):e087469. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087469.
2
Inconsistencies in rater-based assessments mainly affect borderline candidates: but using simple heuristics might improve pass-fail decisions.基于评估者的评估中的不一致主要影响处于边缘的候选人：但是使用简单的启发式方法可能会改善通过/不通过的决策。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Nov;29(5):1749-1767. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10328-0. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
3
An observational study of self-monitoring in ad hoc health care teams.临时医疗团队自我监测的观察性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jun 23;20(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02115-3.
本文引用的文献
1
Two heads are better than one?三个臭皮匠，赛过诸葛亮？
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 May;24(2):195-198. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09888-3.
2
Comparative Accuracy of Diagnosis by Collective Intelligence of Multiple Physicians vs Individual Physicians.多位医生集体智慧与单个医生诊断准确性的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190096. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0096.
3
Accuracy of self-monitoring: does experience, ability or case difficulty matter?自我监测的准确性：经验、能力还是病例难度起作用？
Med Educ. 2019 Jul;53(7):735-744. doi: 10.1111/medu.13801. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
4
Collaborative Clinical Reasoning-A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies.协作临床推理——实证研究的系统评价
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2017 Spring;37(2):123-128. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000158.
5
The Potential of Collective Intelligence in Emergency Medicine: Pooling Medical Students' Independent Decisions Improves Diagnostic Performance.群体智慧在急诊医学中的潜力：汇集医学生的独立决策可提高诊断性能。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Aug;37(6):715-724. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17696998. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
6
Low performing students have insightfulness when they reflect-in-action.表现不佳的学生在行动中反思时具有洞察力。
Med Educ. 2017 Mar;51(3):316-323. doi: 10.1111/medu.13206. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
7
How thinking about groups is different from groupthink.思考群体的方式与群体思维有何不同。
Med Educ. 2017 Feb;51(2):229. doi: 10.1111/medu.13137. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
8
Leadership and Teamwork in Trauma and Resuscitation.创伤与复苏中的领导力与团队协作
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;17(5):549-56. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.7.29812. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
9
Trauma teams and time to early management during in situ trauma team training.原位创伤团队培训期间的创伤团队与早期管理时间
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 29;6(1):e009911. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009911.
10
Detection Accuracy of Collective Intelligence Assessments for Skin Cancer Diagnosis.皮肤癌诊断集体智能评估的检测准确性
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Dec 1;151(12):1346-1353. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.3149.
Zotero 插件