• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Effect of Quantitative indicators of ilium height on approach of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy treatment in patients with L , S lumbar disc herniation].[髂骨高度量化指标对L₅、S₁腰椎间盘突出症患者经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术入路的影响]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 15;34(2):157-161. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201907021.
2
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5-S1 Disc Herniation: Consideration of the Relation between the Iliac Crest and L5-S1 Disc.经皮内镜下L5-S1椎间盘切除术治疗L5-S1椎间盘突出症:髂嵴与L5-S1椎间盘关系的考量
Pain Physician. 2016 Feb;19(2):E301-8.
3
Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术与微创经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的日间手术疗效比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 9;22(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04038-6.
4
Adjuvant surgical decision-making system for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation after percutaneous endoscopic lumber discectomy: a retrospective nonlinear multiple logistic regression prediction model based on a large sample.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症后辅助手术决策系统:基于大样本的回顾性非线性多因素 logistic 回归预测模型。
Spine J. 2021 Dec;21(12):2035-2048. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.07.012. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
5
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via Transforaminal Approach Combined with Interlaminar Approach for L4/5 and L5/S1 Two-Level Disc Herniation.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术联合经椎间孔入路与经椎板间入路治疗 L4/5 和 L5/S1 双节段椎间盘突出症
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):979-988. doi: 10.1111/os.12862. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
6
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 15;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02929-5.
7
Should adjacent asymptomatic lumbar disc herniation be simultaneously rectified? A retrospective cohort study of 371 cases that received an open fusion or endoscopic discectomy only on symptomatic segments.是否应同时矫正相邻无症状腰椎间盘突出症?一项仅对有症状节段进行开放融合或内镜椎间盘切除术的 371 例回顾性队列研究。
Spine J. 2021 Mar;21(3):411-417. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
8
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Highly Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniation.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗高度移位型腰椎间盘突出症
Pain Physician. 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):E75-E84.
9
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy as an Alternative to Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Large Lumbar Disc Herniation.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术作为大型腰椎间盘突出症开放腰椎显微椎间盘切除术的替代方法
Pain Physician. 2016 Feb;19(2):E291-300.
10
[Analysis of surgical strategy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in young and middle-aged double-segment patients with lumbar disc herniation].[中青年双节段腰椎间盘突出症经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术的手术策略分析]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Aug 18;53(4):734-739. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.04.019.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Trajectory for a Transpedicular Approach in the Treatment of a Highly Downward-Migrated Lumbar Herniation with a Full Endoscopic Technique.一种用于治疗高度向下移位腰椎间盘突出症的经椎弓根入路全内镜技术的新轨迹。
Front Surg. 2022 May 17;9:915052. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.915052. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
[Effect and effectiveness analysis of different approaches of transforaminal endoscope on extirpation amount of nuclues pulposus].[经椎间孔内窥镜不同入路对髓核摘除量的效果及有效性分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 15;32(7):933-940. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201711039.
2
Micro-endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic surgery for lumbar disk herniation.腰椎间盘突出症的显微内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内镜手术对比
J Int Med Res. 2018 Sep;46(9):3910-3917. doi: 10.1177/0300060518781694. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
3
[Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy combined with Coflex interspinous process dynamic reconstruction system in treatment of youth lumbar disc herniation].经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术联合Coflex棘突间动态重建系统治疗青年腰椎间盘突出症
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 15;31(2):191-196. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201608062.
4
Comparison of MED and PELD in the Treatment of Adolescent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A 5-Year Retrospective Follow-Up.MED与PELD治疗青少年腰椎间盘突出症的比较:5年回顾性随访
World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;112:e255-e260. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.030. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
5
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
7
A case-control study on the treatment of protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc through PELD and MED.一项关于经皮内镜下腰椎间盘摘除术(PELD)和微创扩张通道腰椎间盘切除术(MED)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的病例对照研究。
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Oct;14(4):3708-3712. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4929. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
8
Microendoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.腰椎间盘突出症的显微内镜下椎间盘切除术与开放椎间盘切除术:一项荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2016 May;25(5):1373-1381. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4523-3. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
9
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disk Herniation.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Nov;29(9):368-371. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000366.
10
Minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation.微创管状显微椎间盘切除术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):48-53. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.SPINE14883. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

[髂骨高度量化指标对L₅、S₁腰椎间盘突出症患者经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术入路的影响]

[Effect of Quantitative indicators of ilium height on approach of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy treatment in patients with L , S lumbar disc herniation].

作者信息

Gao Hangfei, Gui Jiancao, Jiang Yiqiu, Xu Yan, Xu Bo, Xiong Mingyue, Cui Yongguang

机构信息

Department of Traumatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science & Technology, Luoyang Henan, 471000, P.R.China.

Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Nanjing Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210006, P.R.China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 15;34(2):157-161. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201907021.

DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.201907021
PMID:32030944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8171971/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify effect of quantitative indicators of ilium height on approach of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) treatment in patients with L , S lumbar disc herniation.

METHODS

A retrospective study between May 2014 and March 2016 was conducted, including 100 patients with disc herniation at L , S , who were initially enrolled for the PELD treatment. Among them, 66 patients were successfully treated with PELD (group A), and the other 34 patients failed to perform puncture, catheterization, or microscopical operation due to the influence of iliac bone and other peripheral bone structures and treated with alternative surgical plans. By analyzing the X-ray films of lumbar vertebrae (including bilateral ilium) of the two groups before operation, the concept of ilium height rate and ilium angle rate was put forward innovatively. The ilium height rate and ilium angle rate of the two groups were measured and compared, and the diagnostic critical points of ilium height rate and ilium angle rate were determined by ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

The ilium height rate was 0.61±0.09, 0.74±0.05 and the ilium angle rate was 0.66±0.08, 0.80±0.08 in groups A and B, respectively, showing significant differences between the two groups ( =69.729, =0.000; =65.165, =0.000). ROC curve analysis showed that the critical point of ilium height rate was 0.71 (area under ROC curve was 0.927, =0.000), and the critical point of ilium angle rate was 0.75 (area under ROC curve was 0.965, =0.000).

CONCLUSION

PELD is not recommended for patients with L , S intervertebral disc herniation, when the ilium height rate is greater than 0.71 and/or the ilium angle rate is greater than 0.75. Other surgical plans such as transpedicular approach, transpedicular approach, or open surgery, should be recommended to reduce the risk of surgery and the pain of patients.

摘要

目的

探讨髂骨高度量化指标对L、S腰椎间盘突出症患者经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)治疗入路的影响。

方法

对2014年5月至2016年3月期间100例L、S椎间盘突出症患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者最初均入选PELD治疗。其中,66例患者成功接受PELD治疗(A组),另外34例患者因髂骨及其他周围骨骼结构的影响未能进行穿刺、置管或显微手术,转而采用其他手术方案治疗。通过分析两组患者术前腰椎(包括双侧髂骨)X线片,创新性地提出髂骨高度率和髂骨角度率的概念。测量并比较两组的髂骨高度率和髂骨角度率,通过ROC曲线分析确定髂骨高度率和髂骨角度率的诊断临界点。

结果

A组和B组的髂骨高度率分别为0.61±0.09、0.74±0.05,髂骨角度率分别为0.66±0.08、0.80±0.08,两组间差异有统计学意义(=69.729,=0.000;=65.165,=0.000)。ROC曲线分析显示,髂骨高度率的临界点为0.71(ROC曲线下面积为0.927,=0.000),髂骨角度率的临界点为0.75(ROC曲线下面积为0.965,=0.000)。

结论

当髂骨高度率大于0.71和/或髂骨角度率大于0.75时,不建议对L、S椎间盘突出症患者采用PELD治疗。应推荐其他手术方案,如经椎弓根入路、经椎弓根入路或开放手术,以降低手术风险和患者痛苦。