Suppr超能文献

避孕在线交流:一项在线群组传播避孕信息的随机试验

Birth Control Connect: A randomized trial of an online group to disseminate contraceptive information.

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA 94110, USA; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA 94110, USA; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.

University of California, San Francisco, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2020 Jun;101(6):376-383. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to test whether participation in an online group including IUD users influenced IUD-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior among IUD non-users, as a proof-of-concept evaluation of information dissemination for less commonly used or novel contraceptives.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a blinded, randomized controlled trial on the effect of online communication with IUD users within an online program called Birth Control Connect. Participants were women age 18-45 living in the United States who had never used an IUD. We invited participants randomized to the intervention to join two-week, nine-member discussion groups including four satisfied IUD users and five IUD non-users; we invited control participants to groups including nine IUD non-users. We performed chi-squared tests on IUD knowledge, information-seeking, informational support and use in immediate post-surveys, and t-tests comparing change in IUD attitudes and frequency of logins to discussion groups.

RESULTS

We invited 488 IUD non-users and enrolled them into 70 groups between October 2015 and April 2016. We found increased positive attitudes towards the IUD in the intervention arm (0.65-point increase between pre- and post-surveys, versus 0.05 mean change for control arm, p = 0.03 for hormonal IUD, with a trend in the same direction for the non-hormonal IUD). Informational support also increased, with 70.3% of intervention arm participants self-reporting that they gained a better idea of what the IUD would be like, compared to 51.3% in control arm (p < 0.01). Of intervention participants, 63.3% versus 51.3% of control participants reported gaining new information from their group (p = 0.03). There were no differences in correct responses to knowledge items or information-seeking between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Online exposure to IUD users increased positive attitudes toward the IUD and informational support for decision-making about the IUD among non-users.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

Online spaces provide a promising environment for the exchange of accurate, useful contraceptive information based on real user experiences. Interventions aiming to harness social communication through structured online conversations (e.g., on existing social media platforms) about user experiences with lesser-known contraceptive methods such as the IUD may be worthwhile.

摘要

目的

我们旨在测试在避孕节育在线交流项目中,参与宫内节育器使用者群组是否会影响宫内节育器非使用者对宫内节育器的相关知识、态度和行为,以作为对较不常用或新型避孕药具的信息传播进行概念验证评估。

研究设计

我们在名为“避孕节育连接”的在线项目中进行了一项关于在线与宫内节育器使用者交流对非使用者影响的双盲、随机对照试验。参与者为年龄在 18-45 岁之间、居住在美国且从未使用过宫内节育器的女性。我们邀请随机分配到干预组的参与者加入为期两周、有九名成员的讨论组,其中包括四名满意的宫内节育器使用者和五名宫内节育器非使用者;我们邀请对照组的参与者加入包括九名宫内节育器非使用者的小组。我们在即时调查后进行了卡方检验,以评估宫内节育器知识、信息寻求、信息支持和使用情况,并进行 t 检验比较宫内节育器态度的变化和登录讨论组的频率。

结果

我们邀请了 488 名宫内节育器非使用者,并在 2015 年 10 月至 2016 年 4 月期间将他们纳入 70 个小组。我们发现干预组对宫内节育器的态度更加积极(干预组在预调查和后调查之间增加了 0.65 分,而对照组平均变化为 0.05 分,p=0.03 用于激素宫内节育器,而非激素宫内节育器也有类似的趋势)。信息支持也有所增加,70.3%的干预组参与者表示他们对宫内节育器的情况有了更好的了解,而对照组为 51.3%(p<0.01)。与对照组相比,干预组中有 63.3%的参与者表示从他们的小组中获得了新信息,而对照组为 51.3%(p=0.03)。两组在知识项目的正确回答或信息寻求方面没有差异。

结论

在线接触宫内节育器使用者增加了非使用者对宫内节育器的积极态度和决策支持信息。

意义声明

在线空间为基于真实用户体验的准确、有用的避孕信息交流提供了有前景的环境。旨在利用通过关于不太知名的避孕方法(如宫内节育器)的用户体验进行结构化在线对话(例如,在现有的社交媒体平台上)进行社交交流的干预措施可能是值得的。

相似文献

4
The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review.年轻女性使用宫内节育器的安全性:一项系统综述。
Contraception. 2017 Jan;95(1):17-39. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
9
Hormonal intrauterine devices.激素宫内节育器
Ann Med. 1993 Apr;25(2):143-7. doi: 10.3109/07853899309164158.

引用本文的文献

8
Attitudes Toward the Copper IUD in Sweden: A Survey Study.瑞典对铜宫内节育器的态度:一项调查研究。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Jul 8;3:920298. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.920298. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

5
Historical record-setting trends in IUD use in the United States.美国宫内节育器(IUD)使用情况创历史记录的趋势。
Contraception. 2018 Dec;98(6):467-470. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 May 26.
8

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验