Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Health Behavior, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214-8028, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;17(3):978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030978.
: Smoke-free air policies exist to protect users and nonusers from exposure to tobacco smoke. Although electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) may expose passerby to nicotine and particulate matter, few US states regulate indoor use of ENDS. The purpose of this study was to investigate reported rationales for ENDS use and reported ENDS use in public smoke-free places by dual cigarette/ENDS users. : A population of ENDS/cigarette co-users ( = 2051) was drawn from Wave 2 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) dataset (2014-2015). Harm reduction beliefs and cessation behavior of co-users were investigated as predictors of ENDS use in public smoke-free places using logistic regression. Fifty-eight percent of dual users reported past 30-day ENDS use in public smoke-free places. Reported use of ENDS to cut down on cigarette smoking (OR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.86, 3.05), as an alternative to quitting tobacco (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.37, 2.13), or because of belief that ENDS help people to quit cigarettes (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.20, 1.92) were significantly associated with increased odds of ENDS use in smoke-free places. Beliefs that ENDS were useful as cessation tools or posed modified risk to users and nonusers were associated with elevated odds of use ENDS in locations where conventional tobacco is prohibited. Due to limitations in the survey instrument, in-home ENDS use could not be directly assessed in this analysis. However, these self-reported findings suggest that use of ENDS in public places where cigarette use is prohibited is prevalent enough to be of concern for future regulation and enforcement efforts.
无烟空气政策旨在保护使用者和非使用者免受烟草烟雾暴露。尽管电子尼古丁输送系统(ENDS)可能会使路人接触到尼古丁和颗粒物,但美国很少有州规定室内使用 ENDS。本研究旨在调查报告的 ENDS 使用理由和双重香烟/ENDS 用户在公共场所报告的 ENDS 使用情况。
从人口评估烟草和健康(PATH)数据集(2014-2015 年)的第 2 波中抽取了 ENDS/香烟共同使用者的人群(=2051)。使用逻辑回归调查共同使用者的减少伤害信念和戒烟行为是否为公共场所无烟环境中使用 ENDS 的预测因素。58%的双重使用者报告过去 30 天在公共场所使用过 ENDS。报告使用 ENDS 减少吸烟(OR:2.38,95%CI:1.86,3.05),替代戒烟(OR:1.71,95%CI:1.37,2.13),或因为相信 ENDS 有助于人们戒烟(OR:1.52,95%CI:1.20,1.92)与在无烟场所使用 ENDS 的几率增加显著相关。认为 ENDS 作为戒烟工具有用或对使用者和非使用者构成修改风险的信念与在禁止使用传统烟草的场所使用 ENDS 的几率升高有关。由于调查工具的限制,本分析无法直接评估在家中使用 ENDS 的情况。然而,这些自我报告的发现表明,在禁止使用香烟的公共场所使用 ENDS 的情况普遍存在,足以引起对未来监管和执法工作的关注。