• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在总量管制与交易政策和不确定需求下,两个风险厌恶型竞争制造商的最优决策。

Optimal Decisions for Two Risk-Averse Competitive Manufacturers under the Cap-and-Trade Policy and Uncertain Demand.

机构信息

Business School, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 5;17(3):1010. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031010.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17031010
PMID:32033436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7037810/
Abstract

With the increasingly serious problem of environmental pollution, reducing carbon emissions has become an urgent task for all countries. The cap-and-trade (C&T) policy has gained international recognition and has been adopted by several countries. In this paper, considering the uncertainty of market demand, we discuss the carbon emission reduction and price policies of two risk-averse competitive manufacturers under the C&T policy. The two manufacturers have two competitive behaviors: simultaneous decision making and sequential decision making. Two models were constructed for these behaviors. The optimal decisions, carbon emission reduction rate, and price were obtained from these two models. Furthermore, in this paper the effects of some key parameters on the optimal decision are discussed, and some managerial insights are obtained. The results show that the lower the manufacturers' risk aversion level is, the higher their carbon emission reduction rate and utilities. As the carbon quota increases, the manufacturers' optimal carbon reduction rate and utilities increase. Considering consumers' environmental awareness, it is more beneficial for the government to reduce the carbon quota and motivate manufacturers' internal enthusiasm for emission reduction. The government can, through macro control of the market, make carbon trading prices increase appropriately and encourage manufacturers to reduce carbon emissions.

摘要

随着环境污染问题日益严重,减少碳排放已成为各国的当务之急。总量管制与排放交易(Cap-and-Trade,C&T)政策已经得到国际认可,并被多个国家采用。本文考虑到市场需求的不确定性,在 C&T 政策下,讨论了两个风险厌恶型竞争制造商的减排和价格策略。这两个制造商有两种竞争行为:同时决策和序贯决策。针对这两种行为构建了两个模型。从这两个模型中得出了最优决策、减排率和价格。此外,本文还讨论了一些关键参数对最优决策的影响,并得出了一些管理启示。结果表明,制造商的风险厌恶程度越低,其减排率和效用越高。随着碳配额的增加,制造商的最优减排率和效用增加。考虑到消费者的环境意识,政府通过对市场的宏观调控,降低碳配额并激发制造商的减排积极性,更有利于社会。政府可以通过适当提高碳交易价格,鼓励制造商减少碳排放,从而实现这一目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/532c/7037810/557e3cc0baab/ijerph-17-01010-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/532c/7037810/357cf531fa8b/ijerph-17-01010-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/532c/7037810/5698079855b5/ijerph-17-01010-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/532c/7037810/83e65e156c62/ijerph-17-01010-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/532c/7037810/9b6d1f6b4ba9/ijerph-17-01010-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/532c/7037810/557e3cc0baab/ijerph-17-01010-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/532c/7037810/357cf531fa8b/ijerph-17-01010-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/532c/7037810/5698079855b5/ijerph-17-01010-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/532c/7037810/83e65e156c62/ijerph-17-01010-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/532c/7037810/9b6d1f6b4ba9/ijerph-17-01010-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/532c/7037810/557e3cc0baab/ijerph-17-01010-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal Decisions for Two Risk-Averse Competitive Manufacturers under the Cap-and-Trade Policy and Uncertain Demand.在总量管制与交易政策和不确定需求下,两个风险厌恶型竞争制造商的最优决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 5;17(3):1010. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031010.
2
The Optimal Carbon Emission Reduction and Prices with Cap and Trade Mechanism and Competition.最优碳减排与价格的总量管制与交易机制和竞争。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 16;15(11):2570. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112570.
3
Manufacturers' product line strategies and environmental impacts under carbon cap and trade policies.碳总量控制与交易政策下制造商的产品线策略及环境影响
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(27):40781-40795. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17909-1. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
4
Coordination Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Risk Aversion under Carbon Quota Policy.考虑碳配额政策下风险规避的低碳供应链协调决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;19(5):2656. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052656.
5
How carbon trading policy should be integrated with carbon tax policy-laboratory evidence from a model of the current state of carbon pricing policy in China.碳排放交易政策应如何与碳税政策相结合——来自中国碳定价政策现状模型的实验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(9):23851-23869. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23787-y. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
6
Manufacturer's Encroachment and Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions Considering Cap-and-Trade Regulation and Consumers' Low-Carbon Preference.制造商的侵蚀和考虑碳交易管制和消费者低碳偏好的减排决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 21;19(16):10407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610407.
7
Pricing-decision analysis of green supply chain with two competitive manufacturers considering horizontal and vertical fairness concerns.考虑水平和垂直公平关切的两个竞争制造商的绿色供应链定价决策分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(44):66235-66258. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19892-7. Epub 2022 May 2.
8
How do the carbon emission trading prices affect the financing decision of the supply chain considering carbon neutrality?考虑碳中性时,碳排放交易价格如何影响供应链的融资决策?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(30):76171-76191. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27448-6. Epub 2023 May 26.
9
Optimal Coordination Strategy for International Production Planning and Pollution Abating under Cap-and-Trade Regulations.基于总量控制与交易制度的国际生产计划与污染减排的最优协调策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 19;16(18):3490. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183490.
10
Pricing and Quantity Decisions under Asymmetric Carbon Emission Reduction Information and Cap-and-Trade Mechanism.不对称碳减排信息和总量控制交易机制下的定价和数量决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1944. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031944.

引用本文的文献

1
Coordination Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Risk Aversion under Carbon Quota Policy.考虑碳配额政策下风险规避的低碳供应链协调决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;19(5):2656. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052656.
2
Implementation of a Multi-Agent Carbon Emission Reduction Strategy under the Chinese Dual Governance System: An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach.中国双重治理体系下的多主体碳减排策略实施:基于演化博弈理论的方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;17(22):8463. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228463.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal Coordination Strategy for International Production Planning and Pollution Abating under Cap-and-Trade Regulations.基于总量控制与交易制度的国际生产计划与污染减排的最优协调策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 19;16(18):3490. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183490.
2
Leasing or Selling? Durable Goods Manufacturer Marketing Model Selection under a Mixed Carbon Trading-and-Tax Policy Scenario.租赁还是销售?混合碳交易与税收政策情景下耐用商品制造商营销模式选择
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 16;16(2):251. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020251.
3
The Optimal Carbon Emission Reduction and Prices with Cap and Trade Mechanism and Competition.
最优碳减排与价格的总量管制与交易机制和竞争。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 16;15(11):2570. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112570.